No. 2, April 2005
Adherence to Heart-Healthy Behaviors in a Sample of the U.S. Population
Rosalie R. Miller, MD, MPH, Anne E. Sales, MSN, PhD, Branko Kopjar, MD, MS, PhD, Stephan D. Fihn, MD, MPH, Chris L. Bryson, MD, MS
Suggested citation for this article: Miller RR, Sales AE, Kopjar B, Fihn SD, Bryson CL. Adherence to heart-healthy behaviors in a sample of the U.S. population.
Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Apr [date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/
Following national recommendations for physical activity, diet, and nonsmoking can reduce both incident and recurrent coronary heart disease. Prevalence data about combinations of behaviors are lacking. This study describes the prevalence of full adherence to national recommendations for physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption, and nonsmoking among individuals with and without
coronary heart disease and examines characteristics associated with full adherence.
We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a national population-based survey. We included respondents to the cardiovascular disease module and excluded individuals with poor physical health or activity limitations.
Subjects were most adherent to smoking recommendations (approximately 80%) and less adherent to fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity (approximately 20% for both). Only 5% of those without coronary heart disease and 7% of those with coronary heart disease were adherent to all three behaviors (P < .01). Among those without a history of coronary heart disease, female sex (odds ratio
[OR] 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–1.76), highest age quintile (OR 1.67;
95% CI, 1.28–2.19), more education (OR 2.48; 95% CI, 1.69–3.64), and more income (OR 1.19;
95% CI, 1.04–1.36) were associated with full adherence. Among those with coronary heart disease, mid-age quintile (OR 3.79;
95% CI, 1.35–10.68), good general health (OR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.07–3.94), and
more income (OR 1.51; 95% CI, 1.06–2.16) were associated with full adherence.
These data demonstrate the lack of a heart-healthy lifestyle among a sample of U.S. adults with and without coronary heart disease. Full adherence to combined behaviors is far below adherence to any of the individual behaviors.
Back to top
Physical inactivity, unhealthy diet, and smoking are three leading health behaviors contributing to the prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in the United States (1,2). Significant research effort goes into documenting the prevalence of these behaviors and quantifying how much they contribute to CHD morbidity and mortality. While prevalence and risk data are available for individual
behaviors, data about combinations of behaviors are lacking.
National recommendations for physical activity, diet, and smoking abstinence are available for all
Americans. For most individuals, even those with CHD, walking is practicable. And for all individuals, independent of CHD or health status, maintaining a healthful diet and smoking cessation are achievable goals. The intent of these recommendations is different for those without and for those with CHD,
namely to prevent incident cases of heart disease in those at risk and to reduce the risk of subsequent events in those with prevalent disease. While smoking is clearly associated with heart disease, a growing body of literature demonstrates that exercise, including moderate activity such as walking (3,4), and increased fruit and vegetable intake reduce the risk of CHD events (5-7). There are
currently some data on the level of adherence to individual health behaviors.
Approximately one in five of the U.S. population adheres to recommendations
for fruit and vegetable intake (8), one in four adhere to recommendations for
exercise (9), and three in four adheres to recommendations not to smoke (10). Yet
adherence to these individual recommendations is still below national goals (2),
and there are very limited data on the combinations of these behaviors.
For public health, combinations of risk factors and behaviors are at least as important to understand as the prevalence of single behaviors. Major risk factors, including cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking clearly are responsible for the vast majority of heart disease (11,12). Furthermore, recommendations for diet, exercise, and smoking
abstinence impact these major cardiovascular risk factors in
different ways. Those with a low-risk profile have a much lower incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than those with one or more single risk factors (13), and the lowest incidence of heart disease appears to be among those who adhere to multiple risk-reducing behaviors (14). The prevalence of individuals with multiple favorable risk factors or who participate in multiple positive health
behaviors is known to be relatively rare (12-14). A full picture of modifiable cardiovascular risk cannot be accurately reflected in separate estimates of adherence to single behaviors.
We have sought 1) to describe the prevalence of full adherence to national recommendations for physical activity, fruit and vegetable consumption, and
smoking abstinence, and 2) to examine characteristics associated with full adherence in a sample of the U.S. population, stratified by CHD status.
Back to top
We used the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey to provide the data for our study. The BRFSS is a population-based, random-digit–dialed telephone survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population aged 18 years and older. The methodology of BRFSS is described in detail elsewhere (15). The following summary focuses on our
analysis of respondents with and without self-reported CHD.
Thirteen states (Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia) and the District of Columbia collected information about the prevalence of CVD in 2000. We selected participants who answered the CVD module (module 13) and then divided this group into individuals with and individuals without
self-reported heart disease based on the following questions: 1) Has a doctor ever told you that you had a heart attack or myocardial infarction? 2) Has a doctor ever told you that you had angina or coronary heart disease? Individuals who responded yes to questions 1 or 2 were defined as having CHD.
We excluded individuals who reported poor physical health or activity limitation for at least a period of 15 days in the preceding month in both individuals with and individuals without CHD. These individuals would not be expected to participate regularly in exercise
because of poor health and are therefore not included in the denominator of people who could potentially participate in these
recommendations. Subjects were asked two questions to quantitate the number of days that they had poor physical health: 1) Now thinking about your physical health, which includes physical illness and injury, how many days during the past 30 days was your physical health not good?; 2) During the past 30 days, for about how many days did poor physical or mental health keep you from doing your usual
activities, such as self-care, work, or recreation? Individuals who had 15 or more days of poor health from either question were excluded.
Responses of “don’t know/not sure” to any of the questions or refusals to give an answer were coded as missing for this analysis.
Ascertaining adherence status
For those individuals with and individuals without self-reported heart disease, we extracted data on the following three health behaviors: physical activity (core question 6), smoking status (core question 7), and fruit and vegetable intake (core question 8)
(Appendix). These behaviors were divided into dichotomous categories classified as fully adherent or not fully adherent to national
Respondents were asked about the two physical activities that they engage in most often and about the frequency and duration of each activity. Respondents were classified as fully adherent if they engaged in a moderate-intensity physical activity at least five days per week for at least 30 minutes per day or vigorous-intensity activity at least three days per week for at least 20 minutes per
day during the preceding month, based on recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American College of Sports Medicine (16). We defined activity on the basis of metabolic equivalent (MET) intensity levels recorded in the compendium of physical activities: light activity, <3 METs; moderate activity, 3–6 METs; and vigorous activity, >6 METs (16).
One MET is defined as the energy expended by sitting quietly and is equivalent to 3.5 ml of O2 uptake per kg body weight per minute, or to 1 kcal/kg of body weight per hour. Using the list of 56 recorded activities in
the BRFSS and each activity’s associated MET, we computed the self-reported frequency and duration of each activity per individual for both moderate-intensity and
vigorous-intensity categories. Respondents were included if they had complete data for either the primary or secondary activity. If the primary or secondary activity met recommendations, or if the summation of primary and secondary activities met recommendations, respondents were counted as fully adherent. Responses with incomplete information about frequency or duration of activity could not be
evaluated for adherence and were coded as missing.
Respondents were asked if they had smoked 100 cigarettes in their entire lifetime and to categorize their current smoking pattern. Current nonsmokers (never and former
smokers) were classified as fully adherent, without regard to the length of time
since ceasing to smoke.
Fruit and vegetable intake
Respondents were classified as fully adherent to fruit and vegetable intake recommendations if they reported
consuming five or more servings per day of combined fruits, fruit juice, and vegetables based on recommendations from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (17) and the American Heart Association (18). Participants were asked to report their consumption frequency of five foods:
fruit, fruit juice (such as orange, grapefruit, or tomato), green salad, carrots, and other vegetables. Each participant was asked how frequently he or she consumed an item. Because
the BRFSS did not inquire about portion size, each affirmative response was counted as one portion. Responses with insufficient data to determine the servings per day of a group were coded as missing for that group.
Participants with data for at least four out of the five groups were included for the analysis. The groups were added together to produce the total number of fruit and vegetable servings per day. Participants reporting a total of five or more servings per day were counted as fully adherent to dietary recommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption.
We excluded potatoes because a growing body of evidence shows that a high intake of starchy vegetables, including potatoes, does not provide protective benefits against CHD and may increase risk of CHD (6,19,20). While the benefit of fruit juice on incident CHD risk has not been clearly established, fruit juice has not been found to confer an increased risk of CHD and was counted towards the
fruit and vegetable total servings.
Combined adherence to physical activity, nonsmoking, and diet
A composite, dichotomous adherence score was calculated for each individual, incorporating physical activity, diet, and nonsmoking data. Respondents were classified as fully adherent to all three behaviors or as not fully adherent. Subjects were included only if they had enough information to count them as either fully adherent or not fully adherent to each individual behavior. A total of 1594
records (4%) were missing full adherence data (diet, 749; physical activity, 746; and current smoking
status, 99) and were excluded from the analyses.
We computed age- and sex-adjusted prevalence estimates by direct standardization, using the entire group of respondents to the CVD module as the referent population. Broad age categories were used in the adjustment, as attempts to refine the age categories further produced inaccurate results because of the small numbers of fully adherent respondents. Statistical significance was tested using
an age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression that accounted for the study design, modeling the characteristic as either a dichotomous or an indicator variable. Because those with CHD comprised 7% of the total population, and the rate of full adherence was low, race and body mass index (BMI) categories were collapsed to produce column proportions. All variables were modeled as categorical
indicator variables unless noted.
Logistic regression was used to examine characteristics associated with full adherence, while adjusting for covariates. Multivariate models included the following covariates: age (18–99, in quintiles), gender, race (white, nonwhite), income (<$15,000; $15,000–$24,999; $25,000–$49,999; ≥$50,000), education (<high school, high school or GED, >high school),
general health (good, not good), mental health (good, not good), and BMI (underweight and normal, <18.5 kg/m2 and 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; overweight, 25–29.9 kg/m2; and obese, ≥30 kg/m2). Age was divided into quintiles to provide sufficient numbers for analysis. Indicator variables were used for age, education, and BMI to model possible
non-linear effects. Income was included as a grouped linear variable. Because the multivariable models revealed no difference in the odds of adherence for respondents with greater than or equal to high school education among those with CHD, the two higher educational categories were combined to create a dichotomous variable (<high school, ≥high school) among those with CHD.
Sociodemographic and health status characteristics were chosen a priori. Multivariable modeling with numerous covariates was not possible given the smaller number of respondents within the CHD group and the low prevalence of full adherence overall. Efforts were made to keep models comparable for both those with and those without CHD. All variables were entered into the model
All P values, adjusted odds ratios, and confidence intervals were obtained from logistic regression analyses that accounted for sampling design using Stata 7 SE (Stata Corp, College Station, Tex). All P values are two-tailed.
Back to top
Of the 43,058 individuals who answered both the CHD questions and the exercise, fruit and vegetable, and smoking questions, 3167 (7.4%) reported CHD. Our final sample included 38,851 subjects. The final sample excluded individuals who were likely to be unable to comply with physical activity recommendations; they reported more than 15 days of limitation
because of poor health or they reported
physical health as not good for more than 15 days. Among the final sample, 2189 (5.6%) reported CHD. As expected, there were disproportionately more subjects with self-reported CHD who were excluded for 15 or more days of poor health (n = 978, 30.9% of those with CHD) compared
with those without CHD (n = 3229, 8.1% of those without CHD). Overall, only 5.1% of those without CHD and 7.2%
of those with CHD fully adhered to all three health behaviors (unadjusted P value for difference
= .009). When adjusted for age and sex, 5.0% of those without CHD and 5.1% of those with CHD were fully adherent (P = .03 for difference).
We examined how combinations of adherence to individual recommendations overlapped and used Venn diagrams to illustrate the frequency of the patterns of overlap. Figures 1a and 1b describe the weighted, unadjusted proportion of individuals adhering to seven possible individual and combined behaviors and the proportion of individuals who did not adhere to any of the behaviors. Regardless
of CHD status, a minority of individuals were fully adherent to all three
recommended behaviors. Adherence to single recommendations and to combinations of recommendations was similar in both groups. Adherence to fruit and vegetable intake and smoking
abstinence was higher among individuals with CHD
(P = .007, fruit and vegetable intake; P = .008, smoking
there was no significant difference between CHD and non-CHD groups in the
proportion of individuals who exercise (P = .10). Most respondents who were adherent to physical activity recommendations were also nonsmokers. Most respondents who adhered to fruit and vegetable intake recommendations were also nonsmokers. However, among individuals with and individuals without CHD, nearly one half of individuals who were adherent to nonsmoking recommendations did not adhere to
either of the other two health behaviors. The proportion of individuals who did not follow any of the recommendations was moderate and similar for both those with CHD (16%) and those without CHD (18%).
Figure 1a. Proportion of respondents without heart
disease adherent to individual and combinations of fruit and vegetable intake,
nonsmoking, and physical activity
recommendations (n, sample = 36,772; N, weighted population = 40,725,302). [A
text description of this diagram is also
Proportion of respondents with heart disease adherent to individual and
combinations of fruit and vegetable intake, nonsmoking, and physical activity recommendations
(n, sample = 2129; N, weighted population = 2,361,137). [A
text description of this diagram is also
Tables 1 and 2 show the characteristics of fully adherent individuals (column proportions labeled Full Adherence) and the age- and sex-adjusted proportions of individuals adherent to single recommendations and the combination of the three among specific groups (row proportions labeled
Smoking Abstinence, Physical Activity, Fruit and Vegetable Intake, and All). The adjusted proportion of
individuals who were fully adherent by individual characteristics varied from 2% to 7% among individuals without CHD
(Table 1) and from 1% to 9% among those with CHD
(Table 2). Among those without CHD, the higher proportion of adherence observed for women was associated with a greater adherence to fruit and vegetable intake but relatively similar levels of adherence for the other two behaviors.
The lower adherence observed for the youngest age group was associated with a combination of lower adherence to smoking and diet
recommendations, despite having better adherence to physical activity. Higher levels of income and education were associated with greater adherence to all three behaviors. Similar trends were seen for income and education among those with CHD.
We also examined characteristics independently associated with full adherence using logistic regression
(Table 3). Among individuals without a history of CHD, highest age quintile [61–99
years] (OR 1.67;
95% CI, 1.28–2.19), female sex (OR 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23–1.76), nonwhite race (OR 1.29;
95% CI, 1.03–1.63), more education (OR 2.48; 95% CI, 1.69–3.64), more income (OR 1.19;
1.04–1.36), good general health (OR 1.39; 95% CI, 0.96–1.20) and good
mental health (OR 1.50; 95%CI, 0.96–2.32) were associated with full adherence. In those with CHD, age quintile 3 [63–69
years] (OR 3.79;
95% CI, 1.35–10.68), age quintile 4 [70–76 years] (OR 3.42; 95% CI, 1.20–9.76), more income (OR 1.51;
95% CI, 1.06–2.16), and good general health (OR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.07–3.94) were associated with full adherence.
Back to top
We evaluated full adherence to three heart-healthy behaviors in a sample of individuals from 13 states and the District of Columbia with and without CHD. We found prevalence estimates for adherence to each single behavior that were similar to other studies (8,21-24). Approximately 18% of those without CHD and 22% of those with CHD were adherent to fruit and vegetable intake recommendations. Li
et al report similar rates of adherence of 19%, 22%, and 23% for BRFSS respondents in the years 1990, 1994, and 1996
(8). We also found approximately 76% of those without CHD and 80% of those with CHD were current nonsmokers, similar to a national sample from the 2001 National Health Interview Survey that found approximately 77% of adults overall were nonsmokers. We found that 21% of
those with CHD and 24% of those without CHD were adherent to physical activity recommendations, also similar to prior published BRFSS data from 1998
in which 25% of the overall population participated in recommended levels of physical activity (22). Most strikingly, we also observed that only about one in 20 individuals was adherent to all three of these behaviors, far below adherence to any of the
Similar to other work in health-related behavior (25,26), we found both an education gradient and income gradient, with prevalence for all three behaviors being highest among individuals with more than high school education and greatest income. Higher levels of education may increase the likelihood of obtaining or understanding health-related information needed to develop heart-healthy
behaviors. And while recent health gains for the U.S. population as a whole appear to reflect achievements among higher socioeconomic groups, lower socioeconomic groups continue to lag (2).
While we found that most respondents classified as adherent to physical activity or fruit and vegetable intake recommendations were also nonsmokers, the lower full adherence observed for the youngest age group for those without CHD was associated with a combination of lower adherence to
nonsmoking and fruit and vegetable intake, despite having better adherence to physical activity. Among those
with CHD, the lower full adherence observed for the youngest age group was associated with a combination of lower adherence to all three behaviors, with smoking accounting for the largest absolute difference between the youngest and oldest groups.
Among those without CHD, we also identified greater full adherence for self-identified nonwhite, nonblack racial groups (i.e., “other”), which was largely related to better adherence to fruit and vegetable intake. It is possible that cultural influences on food preferences account for better adherence and would have been recognized had ethnicity, rather than racial
categories, been reported.
Consistent with other reports, we found that full adherence to dietary recommendations varied by age and sex, with the better dietary habits reported in women among those without CHD and reported in older adults in both CHD groups (27). However, even among these groups, low adherence to individual recommendations was common, suggesting that there is substantial room for improvement. Full
adherence to fruit and vegetable intake was comparable for men and women with CHD and likely represents the greater proportion of men in our sample.
Whether affecting the risk for a first cardiovascular event or recurrent event, studies conclusively show that engaging in lifestyle modification reduces the risk of future coronary events (3-5,28-32). Major risk factors explain the bulk of cases of heart disease, and these risk factors are directly related to diet, physical activity, and smoking (33). Hypertension, cholesterol levels, and
smoking are the most potent risk factors for CVD (13,34,35). Smoking remains the leading
preventable cause of death in the United States (34) and contributes substantially to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The relative risk of CHD associated with physical inactivity ranges from 1.5 to 2.4, an increase in risk comparable to that observed for high blood cholesterol, hypertension, or cigarette smoking
(16). Multiple studies have reported inverse relationships between fruit and vegetable intake and risk of CVD (5,6,28). As previous work has shown, combinations of healthy behaviors have an incrementally more protective effect (14). Among a group of women without CVD at baseline, nonsmokers who maintained healthful diet and who followed physical activity recommendations had an incidence of
coronary events that was 60% lower than the incidence among the rest of the population. Physical activity and healthy diet have been shown to be independently associated with reductions in CHD risk. These findings strongly argue for monitoring the prevalence of not only individual health behaviors in the general population but also the combination of adherence to diet, exercise, and smoking
Health promotion and disease prevention programs aimed at CHD might be more effective if they aimed at particular segments of the population who have more than one behavioral risk factor for CHD. For example, if a large proportion of the population is sedentary and has unhealthy diets but does not smoke, then a two-pronged program that aims at improving diet and physical activity but spends
little or no time on smoking abstinence could be considered.
This study had limitations. The BRFSS does not reach individuals without telephones. Telephone coverage has been found to be lower among poorer households, so lower income respondents in both CHD groups may have been underrepresented in BRFSS samples (36). The BRFSS is based on self-reported data and is subject to reporting error. Misclassification within our CHD groups may have occurred
because of reporting error in the form of incomplete medical knowledge or reporting bias by the respondent. Because of the social desirability of these behaviors, this study may overestimate the number of people adherent to each recommendation and also combinations of behaviors. We also may have misclassified some individuals based on fruit and vegetable intake because of missing data; however,
analyses including subjects with complete data did not differ from analyses including subjects with four out of the five fruit and vegetable responses.
The weighted findings provide prevalence estimates that apply to the 13 states and the District of Columbia that used the BRFSS CVD module in 2000, and there is no guarantee that those 13 states were representative of all 50. However, we have no reason to suspect that these states are dissimilar to the remainder of the states and territories that participate in the BRFSS survey. The response
rate for the 2000 BRFSS was approximately 50%. Although some attempt is made through post-stratification reweighting to force the age, sex, and race composition of the weighted BRFSS population to agree with census totals, it is possible that respondents still differ from nonrespondents on other characteristics that may be relevant to CHD risk factors. We used current national guidelines to
create definitions of adherence to fruit and vegetable intake, exercise, and smoking recommendations. These were based on the guidelines from the CDC and the American College of Sports Medicine (16) and the American Heart Association (37,38) for exercise; from numerous sources, including the American Heart Association, for not smoking (18,38); and from the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (17) and the American Heart Association for fruit and vegetable intake (18). While there is no debate on appropriate smoking behavior for
cardiovascular risk reduction and some debate on the type and amount of physical activity that is best for risk reduction, there is no single widely accepted consensus yet for the most appropriate dietary regimen. In examining only the amount of fruit and
vegetable intake, we ignored other important dietary factors that are known to influence
cardiovascular risk factors. These include other dietary patterns and nutrients, such as the Mediterranean diet, which is high in omega-3 fatty acids, and the DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diet, which is high in fruit servings but also very low in sodium. Nevertheless, generous fruit and vegetable
intake has been associated with reductions in CVD and may reflect generally healthier diets. The consumption of at least five or more servings of fruit and vegetables is also endorsed by the American Heart Association Dietary Guidelines, in part because this dietary pattern generally represents a healthier eating pattern, and also data show reductions in
cardiovascular risk associated with this type of
eating pattern (18).
In summary, we found markedly low full adherence to combined national recommendations for physical activity, fruit and vegetable intake, and
smoking abstinence in this population-based study among people with and people without CHD. Population-wide behavioral strategies that target combinations of unhealthy behaviors and that complement clinical strategies may be more effective in producing desired
changes and reducing the risk of CVD, investments which are critically needed in reducing the nation’s CHD
Back to top
Dr. Miller was an Ambulatory Care Fellow in the Department of Veteran Affairs when this work was performed. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veteran Affairs. Drs Miller and Bryson had full access to the data and take full responsibility for the accuracy of the data analysis.
Back to top
Corresponding Author: Chris L. Bryson, MD, MS, Health Services Research and Development, Northwest Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Met Park W, Suite 1400, 1100 Olive Way, Seattle, WA 98101. The author is also affiliated with the Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Telephone: 206-764-2430. E-mail: email@example.com.
Author Affiliations: Rosalie R. Miller, MD, MPH, Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Wash; Anne E. Sales, MSN, PhD, and Branko Kopjar, MD, MS, PhD, Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Wash,
and Department of Health Services, University of Washington,
Seattle, Wash; Stephan D. Fihn, MD, MPH, Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Wash,
and Department of Health Services and Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Back to top
- American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2004
update. Dallas (TX): American Heart Association; 2003.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy
people 2010: understanding and improving health. Washington (DC): U.S.
Government Printing Office; 2000 Nov.
- Manson JE, Greenland P, LaCroix AZ, Stefanick ML, Mouton CP, Oberman
A, et al.
Walking compared with vigorous exercise for the prevention of
cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med 2002 Sep
- Tanasescu M, Leitzmann MF, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB.
Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart disease in men.
- Bazzano LA, He J, Ogden LG, Loria CM, Vupputuri S, Myers L, et al.
Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of
cardiovascular disease in U.S. adults: the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76(1):93-9.
- Joshipura KJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Speizer FE, et al.
The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med 2001;134(12):1106-14.
- Hu FB, Willett WC.
Optimal diets for prevention of coronary heart disease.
- Li R, Serdula M, Bland S, Mokdad A, Bowman B, Nelson D.
Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in 16 US states: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1990-1996. Am J Public Health 2000;90(5):777-81.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Increasing physical activity. A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recomm Rep 2001;50(RR-18):1-14.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Cigarette smoking among adults--United States, 1999. MMWR 2001;50(40):869-73.
- Greenland P, Knoll MD, Stamler J, Neaton JD, Dyer AR, Garside DB, et al. Major risk factors as antecedents of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease events. Jama 2003;290(7):891-7.
- Khot UN, Khot MB, Bajzer CT, Sapp SK, Ohman EM, Brener SJ, et al.
Prevalence of conventional risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease.
- Stamler J, Stamler R, Neaton JD, Wentworth D, Daviglus ML, Garside D, et al.
Low risk-factor profile and long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality and life expectancy: findings for 5 large cohorts of young adult and middle-aged men and women.
- Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Rimm EB, Willett WC.
Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N Engl J Med 2000;343(1):16-22.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
Technical information and data -- 2000. Atlanta (GA): Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention [Cited 2003 Jan 3].
- Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, et al.
Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine.
- U.S. Department of Agriculture. Nutrition and your health. Dietary guidelines for Americans, 5th
ed, 2000. Washington (DC): U.S. Government Printing Office [cited 2004 Nov
- Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, et al.
AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision 2000:
a statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Stroke 2000;31(11):2751-66.
- Singh RB, Dubnov G, Niaz MA, Ghosh S, Singh R, Rastogi SS, et al.
Effect of an Indo-Mediterranean diet on progression of coronary artery disease in high risk patients (Indo-Mediterranean Diet Heart Study): a randomised single-blind trial.
- de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Delaye J, Mamelle N.
Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial infarction: final report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. Circulation 1999;99(6):779-85.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
surveillance [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevntion; 2002
[cited 2004 Jan 1].
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
activity trends--US, 1990-1998. MMWR 2001;50:166-9.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
leisure-time and occupational physical activity among employed adults -- United States, 1990. MMWR 2000;49:420-4.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
smoking among adults - United States, 2001. MMWR 2003;52(40):953-6.
- Marmot MG, Bosma H, Hemingway H, Brunner E, Stansfeld S.
Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence. Lancet 1997;350(9073):235-9.
- Smith GD, Wentworth D, Neaton JD, Stamler R, Stamler J.
Socioeconomic differentials in mortality risk among men screened for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: II. Black men. Am J Public Health 1996;86(4):497-504.
- Thomas RJ, Kottke TE, Brekke MJ, Brekke LN, Brandel CL, Aase LA, et al.
Attempts at changing dietary and exercise habits to reduce risk of CVD: who's doing what in the community? Prev Cardiol 2002;5(3):102-8.
- Liu S, Manson JE, Lee IM, Cole SR, Hennekens CH, Willett WC, et al.
Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of CVD: the Women's Health Study.
Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72(4):922-8.
- Lemaitre RN, Heckbert SR, Psaty BM, Siscovick DS.
Leisure-time physical activity and the risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction in postmenopausal women.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155(21):2302-8.
- Kawachi I, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, et al.
Smoking cessation and time course of decreased risks of coronary heart disease in middle-aged women. Arch Intern Med 1994;154(2):169-75.
- Rosenberg L, Kaufman DW, Helmrich SP, Shapiro S.
The risk of myocardial infarction after quitting smoking in men under 55 years of age. N Engl J Med 1985;313(24):1511-4.
- Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Shapiro S.
Decline in the risk of myocardial infarction among women who stop smoking. N Engl J Med 1990;322(4):213-7.
- Magnus P, Beaglehole R.
The real contribution of the major risk factors to the coronary epidemics: time to end the "only-50%" myth. Arch Intern Med 2001;161(22):2657-60.
- Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL.
Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000.
- Neaton JD, Wentworth D.
Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and death from coronary heart disease. Overall findings and differences by age for 316,099 white men. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med 1992;152(1):56-64.
- Thornberry OT, Massey JT. Trends in United States telephone coverage
across time and subgroups. In: Groves RM, editor. Telephone survey methodology. New York: Wiley
& Sons; 1988. p. 25-49.
- Smith SC Jr, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Cerqueira MD, Dracup K, et al.
AHA/ACC Scientific Statement: AHA/ACC guidelines for preventing heart attack and death in patients with atherosclerotic CVD: 2001 update:
a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 2001;104(13):1577-9.
- Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, Eckel RH, Fair JM, Fortmann SP, et al.
AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of CVD and Stroke: 2002 Update: Consensus Panel Guide to Comprehensive Risk Reduction for Adult Patients Without Coronary or Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases. American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Circulation 2002;106(3):388-91.
Back to top