Volume 5: No.
1, January 2008
Developing a Telephone Assessment of Physical Activity (TAPA) Questionnaire for Older Adults
Charles J. Mayer, MD, MPH, Lesley Steinman, MPH, MSW, Barbara Williams, PhD, Tari D. Topolski, PhD, James LoGerfo, MD, MPH
Suggested citation for this article: Mayer CJ,
Steinman L, Williams B, Topolski TD, LoGerfo J. Developing a telephone
assessment of physical activity (TAPA) questionnaire for older adults. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5(1).
jan/06_0143.htm. Accessed [date].
We report on development and preliminary validation of a brief, telephone-based measurement tool for assessing physical activity in older adults. The Telephone Assessment of Physical Activity
(TAPA) questionnaire is based on the University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center’s Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity
(RAPA), a written questionnaire.
The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity questionnaire was modified to permit
interviewers to administer it as a telephone interview. We retained its scoring
levels and interpretation. The pilot test of the telephone version assessed the
questionnaire’s ease of administration and construct validity in a
community-based sample of older adults. Spearman rho and kappa statistics were
computed for comparison with the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity questionnaire and the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire.
Thirty-four older adults completed the telephone assessment. A Spearman rho of 0.74 and a kappa statistic of
0.48 were found between TAPA and the written RAPA.
The pilot test demonstrated that the TAPA questionnaire is a promising instrument for use as a brief, telephone-based questionnaire for assessing physical activity in older adults.
Back to top
Physical activity has been shown to assist older adults in managing chronic conditions and to delay decline in their physical and mental health (1). Currently, however, reports show that fewer than 20% of U.S. adults aged 64
or older engage in the U.S. Surgeon General’s recommended levels of physical activity (2), and only 11% engage in strength training (3).
The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) questionnaire was designed to provide clinicians with a tool for quickly assessing the level of physical activity of their older adult patients (4). It was developed following an extensive review and evaluation of existing written questionnaires, which were found either
to be too long or to lack sufficient sensitivity for measuring physical
activity in older adults. RAPA was found to be reliable and valid compared with the longer, validated Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors (CHAMPS) questionnaire (4,5). However, one drawback to RAPA’s use outside the clinical setting is its highly visual format, which is not amenable to a telephone-based assessment of physical activity. This study was designed to address
this limitation of RAPA by adapting it for use in telephone-based surveys of physical activity.
Other telephone-based physical activity surveys have been used and validated for general use; however, these surveys were not designed to address specific aspects of physical activity among older adults, for example, capturing lighter activities, such as walking leisurely, light vacuuming, light yard work, or light exercise such as stretching (5-7). Telephone-based surveys could be an ideal
means of assessing physical activity in older adults, given the many challenges that prevent researchers from evaluating and monitoring this population group, such as the dependence of seniors on others for transportation to a research site. Disabilities often preclude travel to appointments with health care providers and to research sites. Furthermore, evaluating physical activity during visits
to health care providers is often difficult because of the large number of competing health issues to be addressed.
We will discuss the process by which we adapted and developed a new telephone-based physical activity survey for older adults and our preliminary findings from a pilot test of the survey. We compare the Telephone Assessment of Physical Activity (TAPA) with RAPA, the system on which it was modeled, and to CHAMPS for criterion validity. Because scoring for both TAPA and RAPA are the same,
we hypothesized that if both compare equally well with the CHAMPS instrument, an argument for using TAPA and RAPA interchangeably could be made. Our goal is to help researchers, clinicians, and public health practitioners quickly assess and monitor levels of physical activity in older adults.
Back to top
Study design, sample, and setting
In our study’s cross-sectional design, we recruited older adults from the greater Seattle area using advertisements at senior centers, congregate meal sites, and senior public housing. We distributed flyers and used senior services representatives to recruit participants. Criteria for inclusion were being aged 50 years or older, English-speaking, and having the ability to answer
questions regarding physical activity on both a written questionnaire mailed to participants and in a telephone survey. Assistance in filling out the written survey was offered to anyone who needed help because of physical disability (e.g., poor vision, arthritic pain in the hands). We excluded from the study those who were unable to answer questions because of significant cognitive impairment
(e.g., Alzheimer’s disease) or severe acute illnesses (e.g., active heart failure).
The CDC-funded Health Promotion Research Center (HPRC) at the University of Washington in Seattle oversaw development and adherence to the study protocol. A research assistant with a master’s degree in public health mailed and received all the written questionnaires and administered all the telephone physical activity questionnaires. An effort was made to include underrepresented
participants, including men, people of color, and less active seniors.
HPRC researchers, along with members of the RAPA development team, began by adapting the RAPA questions to a telephone survey format. Participants who met the eligibility criteria and gave oral consent during a screening telephone call were then administered the TAPA. After finishing the survey, the research assistant gained qualitative tool performance information by asking the following
questions: We are developing this survey to use with health care and social service providers who work with older adults. Do you have any comments about the survey (probe about satisfaction, ease of use, acceptability, comprehension)? What did you like about the survey? What could be improved? One week after TAPA administration, the written versions of RAPA and CHAMPS were either
mailed to the participant’s home or arrangements were made to meet the participant in person to administer the questionnaires
orally. Information gathered by the research assistant was used in an iterative process to allow successive improvements to the questionnaire.
We tested two earlier versions of TAPA to improve its ease of use and understandability. The earlier versions had more complicated sentence structure. We found that participants understood and more easily responded to questions with fewer concepts to consider, leading us to subdivide some of our questions. For example, in version 2, question 4 reads “I do moderate physical
activities every week, but less than 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week. Does this describe you?” In the final version, we separated this question into two questions, 4a and 4b (see
Appendix); “I do some moderate physical activities every week, but less than 30 minutes per day. Does this describe you?” and “I do some moderate physical activities every week, but less
than 5 days per week. Does this describe you?” A total of two pilot versions were administered during this iterative process. The questionnaire was administered between August 2005 and March 2007. The University of Washington Human Subjects Division approved all procedures, and participants received a nominal gratuity of $15 to thank them for participating.
Scoring of RAPA and TAPA was based on physical activity criteria derived from the Surgeon General’s recommendations (2). One point is given for “sedentary level of activity,” two for “underactive,”
three for “active but does not meet standard recommendations,” four for “meets
standard recommendations.” CHAMPS scoring is based on caloric energy expended in
moderate-intensity physical activities having a metabolic equivalent value of
To assess how well TAPA captured the physical activity level of older adults, we compared it with the two written questionnaires, RAPA and CHAMPS. In initial analyses we looked at the agreement in levels of physical activity (sedentary to active), from TAPA and RAPA. We then analyzed the participants’ answers to TAPA
and RAPA for their relationship to CHAMPS, both in calories scored as a
continuous variable and in meeting or exceeding the Surgeon General’s physical
activity recommendations. CHAMPS activities were scored as a continuous variable
by determining moderate physical activity calories per week. Participants met
the physical activity recommendation if they reported in CHAMPS that they
engaged in moderate physical activities at least 5 days per week for a total of
3 or more hours per week or engaged in vigorous physical activities at least 3
days per week for a total of 1 or more hours per week. We assessed criterion
validity by calculating a Spearman rho. Scoring instructions are described in the Appendix. Stata 9 software (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas) was used for this analysis.
Back to top
Thirty-six participants completed the TAPA telephone survey. Of those who completed TAPA, 34 also completed RAPA and CHAMPS. Participants were aged 63
to 92 years (mean age 75), were mostly female (62%), and represented a diverse sample of minority groups
(Table 1). TAPA and RAPA each took 5
to 10 minutes to administer compared with 30 to 40 minutes for CHAMPS.
Table 2 shows the percentage of participants for each level of activity and compares responses from the TAPA and RAPA questionnaires. For both questionnaires, the four activity levels were fairly well distributed with a slightly greater percentage of participants meeting the Surgeon General’s physical activities criteria for being sedentary or underactive (2).
The Spearman rho showed a moderately strong correlation of 0.738 (P = .001) between TAPA and RAPA
(Table 3). A kappa statistic of
0.463 (P = .001) showed moderate agreement above chance between the same two questionnaires. TAPA,
with a Spearman rho of 0.672 (P = .001) and a kappa statistic of 0.526 (P =
.001), did not perform as well as CHAMPS. RAPA also did not perform as well as
CHAMPS, with a Spearman rho of 0.663 (P = .001) and a kappa statistic of
0.398 (P = .001).
Back to top
Our study begins to address the existing need among researchers, clinicians, and public health practitioners for a telephone-based physical activity assessment tool for older adults that is brief and effective. TAPA was developed using the strengths of the written RAPA questionnaire and going through two piloted versions in order to improve instrument quality. We designed the TAPA survey to
err on the side of participants not meeting physical activity criteria when they actually met criteria; that is, to overestimate the false negative. Like RAPA, TAPA was designed to assess light activity that does not meet the CDC guidelines of 30 minutes or more of moderate physical activity on every
day or on most days of the week (2).
TAPA is an easy-to-administer instrument that has demonstrated acceptability to a wide range of older adults. Though TAPA was not validated by a physical measurement, our study shows good agreement with RAPA. The TAPA
and CHAMPS Spearman rho and kappa statistic were consistent with the RAPA and CHAMPS findings. This suggests that TAPA and RAPA may be equally effective in assessing physical
activity of older adults in clinical practice.
There are several limitations to this study. The order of question
iteration was not changed during the course of our study. This design flaw did
not allow us to determine whether the order of the questions affected the
strength of the comparisons. TAPA was not validated using an observable measure of physical activity. A sample size of 34, though diverse in both ethnicity and
activity level, was not reflective of the Seattle population as a whole and may not be large enough to make any conclusive statements about TAPA. TAPA’s generalizability may also be limited because our sample of seniors engaged in relatively high levels of physical activity compared with seniors in other published reports, which estimate that over 40% of the older U.S. adult population is
completely sedentary (8). In addition, TAPA’s effectiveness as a monitoring tool was not ascertained. This tool was used only in a cross-sectional analysis, and further research will be required to determine whether it is a competent resource for measuring change over time.
Back to top
TAPA is a brief, easy-to-administer, telephone-based survey developed in a diverse community setting. It has the same scoring and interpretive characteristics as RAPA; however, neither has been tested against a gold-standard physical measurement.
TAPA represents a good start at developing a physical activity assessment tool for older adults that is brief, easy to administer, and telephone-based. Such a tool will play an increasingly important role as the geriatric population increases and greater clinical and public health emphasis is placed on physical activity and on physical activity research.
TAPA needs further validation, including validation in a larger sample that includes a more sedentary group, and assessment of its ability to detect change over time. The next steps in development of TAPA include a larger study with similar outcome measures and a validation study with a physical measurement instrument (e.g., pedometer, accelerometer, gas exchange measurement device).
Back to top
The authors thank the many people and communities that assisted in recruitment for this study. The Southeast Senior Center was especially helpful in recruiting participants and linking our research assistant to other agencies. Charles Mayer was supported by the Health Resources and Service Administration (National Research Service Award T32/HP10002). Data collection, funding, and research
expertise were supported by the University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center (HPRC), a member of the CDC’s Prevention Research
cooperative agreement number U48/DP000050-03.
Back to top
Corresponding Author: Charles J. Mayer, MD, MPH, University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center, University of Washington Department of Family Medicine, 1107 NE 45th St, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98105. Telephone: 206-543-2891. E-mail: email@example.com.
Author Affiliations: Lesley Steinman, Barbara Williams, James LoGerfo, University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Tari D. Topolski, Seattle Quality of Life Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Back to top
- Christmas C, Andersen RA.
Exercise and older patients: guidelines for
the clinician. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48(3):318-24.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical activity and health:
report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Strength training among adults aged >65 years – United States.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(2):25-8.
- Topolski TD, LoGerfo J, Patrick DL, Williams B, Walwick J, Patrick MB. The Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity (RAPA) among older adults. Prev Chronic Dis
Accessed July 2, 2007.
- Stewart AL, Verboncoeur CJ, McLellan BY, Gillis DE, Rush S, Mills KM, et al.
Physical activity outcomes of CHAMPS II: a physical activity promotion program for older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56(8):M465-70.
- Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al.
International physical activity questionnaire: country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(8):1381-95.
- Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Bolen J, Stanwyck CA, Mack KA.
Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soz Praventivmed 2001;46 Suppl 1:S3-42.
- Kruger J, Carlson SA, Buchner D.
How active are older Americans? Prev Chronic Dis 2007;4(3).
Accessed July 2, 2007.
Back to top