Skip Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z

Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy

View Current Issue
Issue Archive
Archivo de números en español

Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal


Volume 3: No. 4, October 2006

Community Intervention to Promote Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables, Smoke-free Homes, and Physical Activity Among Home Caregivers in Bogotá, Colombia


Translation available Este resumen en español
  Ce résumé est en français
Print this article Print this article
E-mail this article E-mail this article:

Send feedback to editors Send feedback to editors
Download this article as a PDF Download this article as a PDF (431K)

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files.

Navigate This Article
Author Information

Diego I. Lucumí, MD, MPH, Olga L. Sarmiento, MD, MPH, PhD, Roberto Forero, MA, MPH, PhD, Luis F. Gomez, MD, MPH, Gladys Espinosa, MSc

Suggested citation for this article: Lucumí DI, Sarmiento OL, Forero R, Gomez LF, Espinosa G. Community intervention to promote consumption of fruits and vegetables, smoke-free homes, and physical activity among home caregivers in Bogotá, Colombia. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2006 Oct [date cited]. Available from:



We conducted a pilot study to develop and assess the effectiveness of three interventions to promote consumption of fruits and vegetables, promote physical activity, and negotiate smoke-free homes among home caregivers in Bogotá, Colombia. Colombian home caregivers were defined as women who take care of minors in their local communities regardless of kinship or family ties.

A nonrandomized community intervention was conducted in low socioeconomic status neighborhoods in Bogotá. Ninety-seven women aged 18 to 60 years participated in one of three groups. In groups A and B, women received the following components: information and communication about healthy behaviors (with group A receiving additional activities); education about developing decision-making skills; and social support from family members and others. In group C, women received only the information and communication component received by group B. The main outcomes (measured at baseline, immediately after the intervention at 5 months, and at 7 months) included self-reported consumption of fruits and vegetables, whether there was an agreement form signed by family members to refrain from smoking inside the home, and self-reported level of physical activity.

No differences were found between intervention groups. Regardless of the intervention, there was an increase in the proportion of women who reported consuming juices made from fruit (from 51.5% at baseline to 80.9% at 7 months, P <.001), an increase in the proportion of women who reported daily consumption of vegetables or salad (from 44.1% at baseline to 64.7% at 7 months, P < .001), and an increase in the proportion of homes with an agreement that forbids in-home smoking (from 27.9% at baseline to 44.1% at 7 months, P = .04). There was no significant difference in levels of physical activity from baseline to postintervention.

Home caregivers may be responsive to community interventions associated with the promotion of healthy diet and agreements with family members who smoke to refrain from smoking in the home.

Back to top


Latin American countries are experiencing an epidemic of chronic diseases that are having an overwhelmingly detrimental impact on the health of their populations (1,2). In Colombia, the leading cause of mortality is cardiovascular disease (121 deaths per 100,000 population) (3).

Evidence shows that unhealthy diets, smoking, and physical inactivity are risk factors for noncommunicable diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes (4,5). In Bogotá, the capital of Colombia, low consumption of fruits and vegetables, tobacco use, and physical inactivity constitute a growing public health concern (6). 

Women from this city are reported to be less physically active than men according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) recommendations (61.9% of women are physically inactive compared with 56.2% of men) (7); also, men are more likely to smoke (38.6% of men compared with 19.1% of women). No sex differences are apparent in the consumption of fruits and vegetables, with an overall mean (± SD) consumption of servings per day of 2.5 (± 2.2) (6). Another study in Bogotá has shown that 44% of women reported two or more lifestyle risk factors such as low consumption of fruits and vegetables, sedentary lifestyle, smoking, or alcohol consumption (8).

In the last decade, some interventions have focused on changing dietary behaviors (9), reducing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (10), and promoting physical activity (11). In Latin America and the Caribbean, the Pan American Health Organization developed Conjunto de acciones para la reducción multifactorial de las enfermedades no transmisibles (CARMEN — Initiative for Integrated Noncommunicable Disease Prevention), a program that promotes research and interventions to prevent chronic disease (2). In this context, previous authors have pointed out that community interventions must be fitted to the social and cultural characteristics of the region (11,12).

Women have been identified as a priority group for public health interventions related to chronic diseases (13,14). Women from impoverished families support each other by looking after not only their own children but also children of family members or neighbors. They may play a critical role in improving healthy behaviors in their communities by becoming role models for the adoption of health behaviors (14). Also, these women have been recognized as potential leaders and may have standing in their local communities (15). 

We hypothesized that home caregivers with the appropriate community intervention could increase fruit and vegetable consumption, be able to negotiate smoking cessation with family members who smoke, and increase their own levels of physical activity. To evaluate this hypothesis, we developed three interventions related to the district program Vive mejor, aliméntate sanamente, libérate del humo, ejercítate con frecuencia y sé feliz (Tu Vales) (Live better, eat healthy, be free of smoke, exercise frequently, and be happy [You Are Valuable]).

To assess the effectiveness of these three interventions and to learn about logistical problems before initiating a large-scale intervention, we conducted a pilot study in four neighborhoods of one locality of Bogotá.

Back to top


Theoretical framework

Social cognitive theory was used to guide the intervention because of its usefulness in assessing personal and environmental factors associated with chronic diseases (16). The underlying concept of social cognitive theory is that human behaviors are explained in terms of a triadic, dynamic, and reciprocal model in which behaviors, personal factors, and environmental factors interact (16). These concepts are described in Table 1.

To guide our community intervention, we created a model comprised of three levels: individuals, neighborhoods, and localities (Figure). In this article, we focus on the individual level. The other levels will be explored in future analyses.

Logic model

Figure. Community model to promote consumption of fruits and vegetables, smoke-free environments, and physical activity among home caregivers, Bogotá, Colombia, 2003. [A text description of this logic model is also available.]

Study setting

Bogotá is located at 8650 feet above sea level. The year-round temperature is between 7oC and 18oC (with no seasonal changes). Tu Vales was conducted in four neighborhoods of Santa Fe, one of 20 localities of Bogotá. Santa Fe has a population of 107,044; 70% of this population is of low socioeconomic status (SES) (17). Santa Fe was selected for this study because it was targeted in 2000 as a demonstration area for developing chronic disease prevention programs. In addition, this locality had the highest prevalence rate of cardiovascular disease in Bogotá in 1999 (18).

The four neighborhoods in Santa Fe were selected because they were prioritized by the government to receive social programs, and community organizations in each neighborhood agreed to promote the participation of home caregivers.

Study population

For this study, a caregiver was defined as any woman aged 18 to 60 years who had lived in Santa Fe for 1 year or more and who had looked after children younger than 15 years for at least 12 months in her residence or local neighborhood. Women who reported mental or serious physical disabilities were excluded from the study. Community leaders invited approximately 35 women identified as home caregivers from each neighborhood. Approximately 120 of them attended the first information session. Of these, 20 could not participate because of time constraints.

Home caregivers received information about the intervention and signed a written consent form. Women who agreed to participate received an apron and a T-shirt as incentives. In addition, at the end of the intervention and evaluation, women and their families were invited to a formal closing ceremony with the research team and the mayor of the locality and received a certificate for their participation. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Fundación FES Social.

Study design

This study was a nonrandomized community-based intervention including three phases: development, implementation, and evaluation. The pilot study was conducted from January 2003 to February 2004. To design the materials for the information and communication and education components, we used social marketing strategies (products, price, place promotion) (19). These strategies took into account daily life practices and cultural, social, and economic characteristics of the target population.


The study comprised three groups: A (intervention group plus), B (intervention group), and C (partial intervention). These groups were geographically separated from one another. The intervention consisted of three components: information and communication, education, and social support.

The information and communication component explored participants’ knowledge about nutrition, smoking, and physical activity. The education component emphasized skill development and autonomy to make healthy decisions. The social support component involved community members such as family, peers, and owners of grocery stores. 

Components were delivered according to each intervention group and behavioral intervention as shown in Table 2. All three groups received the information and communication component. For this component, participants took part in 16 weekly sessions (2 hours each) delivered in each of the community rooms. Physical activity and smoke-free home sessions were provided together in eight sessions, and fruits and vegetables activities were presented in the other eight sessions. A nutritionist (for fruits and vegetables sessions), social worker (for smoke-free home sessions), and physiotherapist (for physical activity sessions) conducted these activities.

Fruits and vegetables intervention

As part of the information and communication component, women received printed information about the benefits of eating fruits and vegetables. Women were also informed about places where and seasons during which they could buy fresh fruits and vegetables at low prices. In addition, women received recipes that incorporate fruits and vegetables so that they could increase their dietary intake. As part of the education component, women were able to adapt and create their own recipes. Groups A and B also received a social support component, which consisted of participation of family members or peers during group sessions and a grocery store intervention. Grocery store owners were visited by a nutritionist and invited to participate in a session where they receive information about their role in promoting healthy eating behaviors in their communities and discuss strategies to promote consumption of fruits and vegetables, such as reducing the price and establishing in-store campaigns to educate consumers about which fruits and vegetables are in season.

Smoke-free home intervention

As part of the information and communication component, women received printed information about the deleterious effect of first- and second-hand smoking. Communication activities included group discussions and the development of a skit relating family experiences with tobacco consumption. The education component involved developing strategies to empower participants to obtain written agreements with smokers in the family to restrict smoking inside their homes. Women from group A received three additional home visits to reinforce the importance of the written agreement to not smoke in enclosed areas at home.

Physical activity intervention

As part of the information and communication component, all home caregivers received informative materials about the benefits of being physically active. Additionally, women received informational materials about how to maximize their physical activity and how to use the places and opportunities of their daily routines to be physically active. Communication activities included group discussions about enablers of and barriers to being physically active. Only women from group A were contacted three times by telephone to complete a questionnaire identifying barriers to physical activity and assessing changes in their stages of physical activity as defined by the transtheoretical model and stages of change theory proposed by Proschaska et al (20). After barriers and stages were identified, the educator provided guidelines for overcoming barriers and moving to the next stage. As part of the educational component, all women participated in physical activities including stretching, dance classes, and toning exercises.  Additionally, women learned how to measure their heart rate. Women from groups A and B participated in brisk walking in their neighborhood (e.g., in parks, on footpaths). As part of the social support component, women from groups A and B identified key peers (family members or friends), who were invited to participate in the educational activities.

Quantitative evaluation

During face-to-face interviews, all women completed a questionnaire on three separate occasions: before beginning the intervention (baseline), immediately after the intervention (at 5 months), and 2 months after the intervention (at 7 months). Interviewers were trained by the principal investigators, and the data collection process was supervised to identify and prevent interviewer bias.

The primary outcome for dietary habits was based on assessments of daily intake of fruits and vegetables using the following questions:

Do you drink juices made of fruits every day?

Not counting juices made of fruits, do you eat whole fruit every day?

Do you eat vegetables or salads every day?

These questions had been culturally adapted in a previous study in Santa Fe (6) and took into account the nutrition module of the Non-Communicable Disease Surveillance Toolkit designed by the Pan American Health Organization (21).

The outcome for smoke-free environment was a written agreement between the family member who smoked and the home caregiver and a verbal confirmation to the researchers about fulfillment of the agreement. 

The primary outcome for physical activity was self-reported participation in regular exercise. These outcome measures were obtained from questions of the Colombian Spanish version of the short format of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (22). For walking, women were classified into the following patterns: regular pattern (those who reported walking for at least 150 minutes in bouts of at least 10 minutes for at least 5 days during the last week) and irregular pattern (those who reported walking less than 150 minutes in bouts of at least 10 minutes for at least 5 days during the last week).

Physical activity during leisure time was dichotomized (regular vs irregular or inactive). Women who had a regular pattern of leisure-time physical activity were those who reported moderate leisure-time physical activity for at least 30 minutes per day in cumulative bouts of at least 10 minutes each for 5 or more days per week or who reported vigorous leisure-time physical activity for at least 20 minutes per session for 3 or more days per week. Women who had an irregular pattern or who were inactive were those who reported participating in moderate or vigorous physical activity for at least 10 minutes at a time but who did not comply with all aspects of the regular activity category.

Statistical analysis 

Our analytic strategy involved three steps. First, we compared sociodemographic characteristics between baseline and postintervention populations of the intervention groups using the χ2 test. Second, we assessed intervention effects across groups by using generalized estimating equations (GEE); we used Proc Genmod (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC) because outcome variables were dichotomous. GEE model procedures allowed us to control for clustering of women according to neighborhoods. For each multivariate analysis model, the outcome corresponded to the status of fruit and vegetable consumption, nonsmoking agreement, or physical activity pattern postintervention. The independent variable was neighborhood group (A, B vs C) as a dummy coded variable and baseline measurement of each behavior. We only adjusted for baseline measure because of small sample size. In addition, possible covariates that could have been main confounders are sex and SES, but the study population was homogeneous with respect to these factors. Analyses were conducted on complete cases at 7 months after the intervention (n = 70). Third, we compared outcome proportions according to time of evaluation (baseline vs 5 months and baseline vs 7 months). In this pilot study, the analysis was not done on an intention-to-treat basis because of missing data on outcome variables and high variability of women participating across educational programs. All statistical analyses were conducted with SAS software version 8.0 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

Qualitative evaluation

After obtaining the results from the statistical analysis, the researchers organized a focus group to obtain insight about the intervention, present the results to the women who had participated, and assess their perceptions about their behavioral patterns. Participants watched a video developed by the research team about their participation in the project and the graph results with the main outcomes. The focus group moderator asked them 1) their opinion about the results that had been shown; 2) what they had learned from the intervention; and 3) what could be done to improve outcomes. Two researchers transcribed the answers given by participants and coded and sorted them according to relevant behavioral categories, such as outcomes and lessons learned, and suggested ways to improve the interventions.

Back to top


Quantitative results

A total of 97 women who satisfied the inclusion criteria participated in the study (24 in group A, 45 in group B, and 28 in group C). Seventy-two percent of the women who were interviewed at baseline completed the three surveys. Table 3 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of all participants at baseline and those who completed the three interview surveys. The only significant difference between those who completed the three surveys and those who completed only the baseline survey was affiliation with community groups (P = .03) (Table 3).

At baseline, approximately half of the women reported consuming fruits every day (51.5% for fruit juices and 54.5% for whole fruit) (Table 4). At baseline, 44.1 % reported consuming vegetables or salads every day. There was a significant increase in the proportion of women who reported consuming juices made from fruit, from 51.5% at baseline to 80.9% at 7 months (P < .001) (Table 4).

Table 5 shows changes from baseline to postintervention for each intervention group, and Table 6 shows the comparison of group outcomes at 7 months. No statistically significant differences were found between intervention and partial intervention groups (Table 6). However, there was a greater increase in the consumption of fruit juices of group C from baseline to 7 months compared with groups A and B (Table 5). In all groups there was also a significant increase in the daily consumption of vegetables or salads from 44.1% at baseline to 66.2% at 5 months and 64.7% at 7 months (Table 4). The consumption of fresh fruits showed a statistically nonsignificant pattern at baseline. Among all groups at baseline, 13.4% of women reported that people smoke inside their homes (Table 4). This proportion decreased to 6.0% at 5 months and 9% at 7 months. Additionally, the proportion of women reporting the existence of a smoke-free home agreement increased from 27.9% at baseline to 39.7% at 5 months and to 44.1% at 7 months (Table 4). However, the proportion of women who reported a smoke-free agreement at 7 months was lower in group A than in groups B and C (Table 5).

At baseline, 19.7% of the women in all groups reported walking at least 150 minutes per week and 33.8% reported engaging in physical activity during leisure time (Table 4). The proportion of women meeting CDC recommendations for physical activity showed a nonsignificant increase from baseline to 5 months and from baseline to 7 months. There were no statistically significant differences between intervention and partial intervention groups for physical activity outcomes (Table 6).

Qualitative evaluation 

During the focus group, 13 women reported that the intervention helped them to identify new and easy ways to prepare fruit and vegetable recipes. They also highlighted the benefits of the social interaction with other women during the workshops. In addition, the workshops allowed them to share different types of fruit and vegetable recipes. They also expressed that purchasing seasonal produce was less expensive than out-of-season produce. Participants also reported redistributing their family budget to increase fruit consumption. Despite strategies to lower the amount of money spent on fruits, women perceived that fresh fruit was more expensive than juice and therefore decided that fruit juices were a better alternative for the family. 

Women recognized that the intervention gave them evidence about the negative effects of first- and second-hand smoke, evidence that was useful in the negotiation and fulfillment of the nonsmoking agreement. However, they found that these agreements could take a long time to establish.  

Participants reported that the intervention increased their awareness about the importance of physical activity, especially walking, in daily life. They also recognized that physical activity had different dimensions. They reported that unsafe areas in their communities were barriers to physical activity.

Finally, they expressed being happy with their participation in Tu Vales and were motivated to participate in this kind of intervention in the future.

Back to top


Tu Vales is one of the first community-based interventions in Latin America with a multicomponent approach to promote consumption of fruits and vegetables, smoke-free home environments, and physical activity. We consider this pilot study to have been useful in exploring a community-based model to promote healthy behaviors adapted to our socioeconomic and cultural context.

The results provided some evidence that interventions with home caregivers that provided information, communication, and education could increase or maintain postintervention changes for overall increases in the consumption of fruits and vegetables and in the establishment of smoke-free home agreements. The qualitative results provided insight about the context of social practice, perceptions, empowerment, and knowledge. These results have important implications for the development of future interventions among women in these communities.

Although we found a significant difference in affiliation with community groups between women completing the baseline survey and women completing the postintervention survey, we cannot extrapolate the effects of this variable to a more general model. Future studies should consider these effects and take into account the association between social support, social cohesion, and health behaviors.

Fruits and vegetables

The changes in the consumption of fruits were mainly due to increased consumption of juices rather than whole fruit. This change could be explained by the fact that fruit juice is less expensive than whole fruit. Home caregivers reported that cost was a barrier to the consumption of fruits, especially for large families (23,24). In contrast, costs were not a major barrier for vegetable consumption, and the overall increase in vegetable consumption also could be associated with the wide availability of some vegetables that are both popular and traditionally accepted. 

Another important finding is that home caregivers recognized the importance of informative and educational strategies to learn about availability of seasonal fruits and family budget distribution. In this context, our findings could guide interventions in future programs such as the proposed program Bogotá sin hambre (Bogotá Without Hunger) (25).

This study provides important evidence for recommending that policy makers and local government agencies increase the availability, quality, and variety of fruits and vegetables in grocery stores and supermarkets in low SES neighborhoods. In addition, we consider that engaging shopkeepers and primary producers at the local level in future interventions could have an important impact in promoting consumption of fruits and vegetables at the community level.

Smoke-free homes 

Considering the complexity of the social context around smoking, our intervention, which focused on family support, needs to be reinforced with social and legal norms (9). As a first step, this project produced an encouraging increase in the adoption of smoke-free agreements and also demonstrated that home caregivers can successfully negotiate these agreements. In addition, this agreement could contribute to smoke-free homes because during the negotiation, women and their families may increase their knowledge about the effects of smoke and second-hand smoke, and they can provide support to smokers contemplating quitting (9).

Physical activity

In Tu Vales we did not find significant differences in walking behaviors after the interventions. The lack of significant differences could be related to the fact that we did not distinguish between walking for other purposes and walking for recreation. Nonetheless, we need to continue developing interventions to promote walking among poor caregivers in Latin America because walking is the most prevalent physical activity among women (26,27).

Although we did not find differences across groups in physical activity behaviors, we found that after the educational intervention to increase awareness of the recreational facilities in their neighborhoods, women were more likely to identify recreational facilities of low cost or no cost in their neighborhoods for their physical activities. More research is needed to demonstrate that home caregivers can be role models for physical activity behavioral interventions because of their influence on children under their care, relatives, and friends.

Limitations and conclusion

This study had several limitations. Our findings should be taken with caution because of the groups’ small sample size, number of participants lost to follow-up, short time of the intervention, and use of some questions, such as the ones used to evaluate the consumption of fruits and vegetables, that did not measure serving sizes.

Nevertheless, the results of this study could be useful to identify enablers of and barriers to consumption of fruits and vegetables, smoke-free homes, and regular physical activity and contribute to the establishment of information, communication, and education methodologies to carry out community-based interventions among poor women. Some lessons learned from this study are related to the potential of involving home caregivers in community interventions, the necessity of establishing strategies that address the physical and social environment, the usefulness of qualitative and quantitative methods, and the advantages of using public health theories and models to conduct and evaluate community-based interventions in a similar context.

As reported in the qualitative results, some of these interventions, such as the implementation of the smoke-free home agreement, may require a long time for dissemination and implementation. However, the framework of Tu Vales will continue to be used to explore and develop phase 2 and phase 3 interventions in Bogotá and other metropolitan areas nationally. We hope this type of intervention can also be used in other developing countries with similar sociocultural characteristics. The next phase of Tu Vales is a large-scale intervention with study populations to include home caregivers, shopkeepers, and leaders of community groups in 32 neighborhoods.

Back to top


The Tu Vales study was funded by Secretaría de Salud de Bogotá D.C. Colombia (grant no. 504/2002). Dr Sarmiento received funding from the Research Fund for Assistant Professors of the Universidad de los Andes (grant no. 1808). Drs Lucumí, Sarmiento, and Espinosa received funding from Colciencias to write this paper (grant no. 347/2004). The authors thank Carolina Ibarra, who provided valuable comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. We appreciate the work of community leaders, health professionals, and all home caregiver women who participated in the study.

Back to top

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Diego I. Lucumí, Health División, Fundación FES Social, Carrera 7 #73-55, Oficina 1202, Bogotá, Colombia, South America. Telephone: 57-1-3130882. E-mail:

Author Affiliations: Olga L. Sarmiento, School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia, and Centro de Estudios e Información en Salud, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá; Roberto Forero, Simpson Center for Health Services Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Luis F. Gomez, Health División, Fundación FES Social, Bogotá, Colombia; Gladys Espinosa, Secretaría Distrital de Salud de Bogotá, DC.

Back to top


  1. Robles SC. A public health framework for chronic diseases prevention and control. Food Nutr Bull 2004;25(2):194-9.
  2. Pan American Health Organization. CARMEN: an initiative for integrated prevention of noncommunicable diseases in the Americas. Washington (DC): Pan American Health Organization; 2003. Available from: *
  3. González M, De la Hoz F. Mortalidad por enfermedades crónicas en Colombia durante el período de 1990 a 1999. Inf Quinc Epidemiol Nac 2002;7(14):205-26.
  4. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. [Published erratum in: JAMA 2005;293(3):293-4; JAMA 2005;293(3):298]. JAMA 2004;291(10):1238-45.
  5. Epping-Jordan JE, Galea G, Tukuitonga C, Beaglehole R. Preventing chronic diseases: taking stepwise action. Lancet 2005; 366(9497):1667-71.
  6. Gómez LF, Samper B, Cabrera G, Espinosa G, Mateus JC, Gómez LC. Factores de riesgo cardiovascular en la localidad de Santa Fe de la ciudad de Bogotá. Resultados obtenidos en el área demostrativa Carmen. Boletín Epidemiológico Distrital 2004;9(7,8,9):4-13.
  7. Gomez LF, Duperly J, Lucumi DI, Gamez R, Venegas AS. [Physical activity levels in adults living in Bogota (Colombia): prevalence and associated factors]. Gac Sanit 2005;19(3):206-13. Spanish.
  8. Gomez Gutierrez LF, Lucumi Cuesta DI, Giron Vargas SL, Espinosa Garcia G. [Clustering patterns of behavioral risk factors linked to chronic disease among young adults in two localities in Bogota, Colombia: importance of sex differences]. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2004;78(4):493-504. Spanish.
  9. Bowen DJ, Beresford SA. Dietary interventions to prevent disease. Annu Rev Public Health 2002;23:255-86.
  10. Emmons KM, Wong M, Hammond SK, Velicer WF, Fava JL, Monroe AD, et al. Intervention and policy issues related to children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Prev Med 2001;32(4):321-31.
  11. Gómez L, Espinosa G, Duperly J, Cabrera G, Gómez O. Revisión sistemática de intervenciones comunitarias sobre actividad física en grupos específicos. Colomb Med 2002;33:162-170.
  12. Forero A, Gómez LF, Espinosa G, Cabrera G, Gómez OL. Intervenciones comunitarias para la promoción de hábitos alimentarios saludables: resultados de una revisión sistemática. Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública 2003;21(2):73-84.
  13. John JH, Ziebland S. Reported barriers to eating more fruit and vegetables before and after participation in a randomized controlled trial: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res 2004;19(2):165-74.
  14. Havas S, Damron D, Treiman K, Anliker J, Langenberg P, Hammad TA, et al. The Maryland WIC 5 A Day promotion program pilot study: rationale, results, and lessons learned. J Nutr Educ 1997;29:343-350.
  15. el-Askari G, Freestone J, Irizarry C, Kraut KL, Mashiyama ST, Morgan MA, et al. The Healthy Neighborhoods Project: a local health department's role in catalyzing community development. Health Educ Behav 1998;25(2):146-59.
  16. Baranowsky T, Perry C, Parcel G. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bass; 1997. p. 153-78.
  17. Departamento Administrativo de Planeación Distrital. Recorriendo Santa Fe. Bogotá (DC): Departamento Administrativo de Planeación Distrital, Secretaría de Hacienda; 2004.
  18. Espinosa G. Mortalidad y morbilidad por enfermedades cardiocerebrovasculares y diabetes en Santafé de Bogotá. Boletín Epidemiológico Distrital 1998;3:1-8.
  19. Lefebvre R, Rochlin L. Social marketing. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bass; 1997. p. 384-402. 
  20. Proschaska J, Redding C, Evers K. The transtheorical model and stages of change. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bass; 1997. p. 60-84.
  21. Pan American Health Organization. Program on non-communicable diseases questionnaire. Section 9: nutrition. Washington (DC): Pan American Health Organization;[cited 2005 Feb 1]. Available from: *
  22. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35(8):1381-95.
  23. Turrell G, Blakely T, Patterson C, Oldenburg B. A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic (small area) differences in household food purchasing behaviour. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58(3):208-15.
  24. Giskes K, Turrell G, Patterson C, Newman B. Socio-economic differences in fruit and vegetable consumption among Australian adolescents and adults. Public Health Nutr 2002;5(5):663-9.
  25. Bogotá Sin Indiferencia, Bogotá Sin Hambre. Bogotá Sin Indiferencia, Bogotá Sin Hambre: por un compromiso social contra la pobreza en Bogotá. Bogotá (DC): Alcaldia mayor de Bogotá D.C., Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo; 2003. Available from: *
  26. Gomez LF, Sarmiento OL, Lucumí DI, Espinosa G, Forero R, Bauman A. Prevalence and factors associated with walking and bicycling for transport among young adults in two low-income localities of Bogotá, Colombia. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 2005;2(4):445-59.
  27. Hernandez B, de Haene J, Barquera S, Monterrubio E, Rivera J, Shamah T, et al. [Factors associated with physical activity among Mexican women of childbearing age]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2003;14(4):235-45. Spanish.

Back to top



Return to your place in the textTable 1. Concepts in Social Cognitive Theory Used to Guide Tu Vales Intervention for Home Caregivers, Bogotá, Colombia, 2003
Concept Implications for Intervention
Environment Participation of families and shopkeepers to provide social support
Situation Correction of misperceptions about consumption of fruits and vegetables, exposure to smoke, and participation in physical activity
Behavioral capability Activities to educate participants about selecting, buying, and preparing fruits and vegetables; promoting smoke-free homes; and engaging in daily physical activity
Observational learning Learning skills developed during group sessions from teacher or other caregivers
Reciprocal determinism Promotion of behaviors among home caregivers, intervention on the environment (families, peers, and shopkeepers)
Return to your place in the textTable 2. Components of Tu Vales Intervention to Promote Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables, Smoke-Free Homes, and Physical Activity for Three Groups of Home Caregivers, Bogotá, Colombia, 2003
Component Group
Information and communication
Group sessions Yes Yes Yes
Phone counseling for physical activity Yes No No
Home visits to promote smoke-free homes Yes No No
Group sessions Yes Yes Yes
Awareness of places for physical activity Yes Yes No
Social support
Participation of family or peers during group sessions Yes Yes No
Grocery store intervention Yes Yes No
Return to your place in the textTable 3. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants in Tu Vales Intervention, Bogotá, Colombia, 2003a
Characteristic Baselineb
(N = 97)
(n = 70)
P Valued
Age, mean (SD), y 37.3 (10.5) 38.4 (10.85) .94
Marital status
  Single 18 (18.6) 10 (14.3) .77
  Married 28 (28.9) 23 (32.9)
  Living with partner 36 (37.1) 24 (34.3)
  Separated or widowed 15 (15.5) 13 (18.6)
No. of children living in household, mean (SD) 2.1 (1.6) 2.1 (1.6) .99
Education, y
  1-5 27 (28.4) 20 (29.0) .91
  6-11 54 (56.8) 40 (58.0)
  12-23 14 (14.7) 9 (13.0)
Principal activity during last 30 days
  Working 58 (59.8) 44 (62.9) .64
  Working/studying 4 (4.1) 3 (4.3)
  Looking for job 4 (4.1) 2 (2.9)
  Housewife 31 (32.0) 21 (30.0)
Paid work
  Yes 61 (62.9) 47 (67.1) .41
  No 36 (37.1) 23 (32.9)
Household salary per month, U.S. $
  <128 83 (85.6) 59 (84.3) .48
  ≥128 14 (14.4) 11 (15.7)
Community mother
  Yes 19 (19.6) 17 (24.3) .32
  No 78 (80.4) 53 (75.7)
Affiliation with community groups
  Yes 22 (31.4) 10 (14.7) .03
  No 48 (68.6) 58 (85.3)
Places where you buy most of food for householde
  Grocery store 23 (38.3) 19 (40.4) .91
  Market square 13 (21.7) 7 (14.9)
  Supermarket 23 (38.3) 21 (44.7)
  Other 1 (1.7) 0 (0)
Health insurance
  Yes 79 (81.4) 57 (81.4) .99
  No 18 (18.6) 13 (18.6)
Perceived health status
  Excellent or very good 11 (11.3) 6 (8.6) .18
  Good 55 (56.7) 44 (62.9)
  Poor or average 31 (32.0) 20 (28.6)
Body mass index, kg/m2, mean (SD) 27.7 (5.5) 27.8 (5.6) .99
Intervention groups
  A 24 (24.7) 18 (25.7) .99
  B 45 (46.4) 31 (44.3)
  C 28 (28.9) 21 (30.0)

aValues are no. (%) unless otherwise indicated.
bNo. of participants in a category may not sum to 97 because of missing responses.
cNo. of participants in a category may not sum to 70 because of missing responses.
dDifferences between proportions or means at baseline and proportions or means at postintervention (7 months from baseline) determined by Cochran Q test of homogeneity.
eThis question answered only by women who buy groceries for the household.

Return to your place in the textTable 4. Changes in Health-related Outcome Measures from Baseline to Postintervention Among Participants (n = 68), Tu Vales Intervention, Bogotá, Colombia, 2003
Outcome Measure Baseline, % 5 months, % Pa 7 months, % Pa
Fruits and vegetables
Consume fruit juice daily 51.5 58.8 .24 80.9 <.001
Consume whole fruit daily 54.5 69.6 .06 55.9 .87
Consume vegetables or salad daily 44.1 66.2 <.001 64.7 <.001
Smoke-free home
People smoke inside homeb 13.4 6.0 .06 9.0 .32
Agreement exists restricting smoking in home 27.9 39.7 .08 44.1 .04
Physical activity
Walk for transportation or recreation at least 150 min/wkc19.7 27.3 .17 19.7 .99
Engage in physical activity during leisure time 33.8 38.2 .58 48.5 .09
Perceive that recreational facilities of low or no cost exist in neighborhood 55.9 72.1 .02 66.2 .16
Report that it is easy to use recreational facilities on Saturdays and holidaysb 77.6 70.2 .30 71.6 .39

aDifferences between baseline and immediately after intervention (5 months) and between baseline and 7 months determined by χ2 test.
bResponse missing for one participant.
cResponse missing for two participants.

Return to your place in the textTable 5. Changes from Baseline to Postintervention in Health-related Outcome Measures Among Participants in Tu Vales Intervention, by Intervention Group, Bogotá, Colombia
Outcome Measure Group A
(n = 18)
Group B
(n = 29)
Group C
(n = 21)
Baseline, % Post-
intervention, %
Baseline, % Post-
intervention, %
Baseline, % Post-
intervention, %
5 mos. 7 mos. 5 mos. 7 mos. 5 mos. 7 mos.
Fruits and vegetables
Consume fruit juice daily 38.9 50.0 77.8 62.1 48.3 75.9 47.6 81.0 90.5
Consume whole fruit daily 27.8 77.8 66.7 62.1 62.1 55.2 66.7 71.4 47.6
Consume vegetables or salads daily 33.3 55.6 55.6 41.4 58.6 62.1 57.1 85.7 76.2
Smoke-free home
People smoke inside home 16.7 0 11.1 21.4 14.3 10.7 0 0 4.8
Agreement exists restricting smoking in home 22.2 22.2 27.8 37.9 55.2 51.7 19.1 33.3 47.6
Physical activity
Walk for transportation or recreation at least 150 min/wk 27.8 50.0 33.3 24.1 20.7 20.7 5.3 15.8 5.3
Engage in physical activity during leisure time 72.2 38.9 55.6 34.5 48.3 51.7 0 23.8 38.1
Perceive that recreational facilities of low or no cost exist in neighborhood 66.7 77.8 77.8 44.8 75.9 58.6 61.9 61.9 66.7
Report that it is easy to use recreational facilities on Saturday and holidays 94.1 70.6 82.4 72.4 72.4 65.5 71.4 66.7 71.4
Return to your place in the textTable 6. Comparison of Intervention Groups for Health-related Outcomes at Postintervention, Tu Vales Intervention, Bogotá, Colombia, 2003
Outcome Group A Compared With Group C Group B Compared With Group C
Odds Ratioa (95% CI) Pb Value Odds Ratioa (95% CI) P Value
Fruits and vegetables
Consume fruit juice daily 0.3 (0.03-2.71) .29 0.2 (0.03-1.53) .12
Consume whole fruit daily 1.8 (0.25-12.35 .56 1.0 (0.13-7.01) .97
Consume vegetables or salads daily 0.4 (0.04-3.62) .40 0.4 (0.05-3.36) .41
Smoke-free home
People smoke inside home 1.0 (0.02-40.74) .99 2.3 (0.06-80.29) .65
Agreement exists restricting smoking in home 0.5 (0.04-5.18) .54 1.5 (0.15-15.72) .71
Physical activity
Walk for transportation or recreation at least 150 min/wk 4.2 (0.34-52.41) .26 1.4 (0.12-16.50) .80
Engage in physical activity during leisure time 2.4 (0.16-34.81) .52 2.4 (0.23-25.28) .46
Perceive that recreational facilities of low or no cost exist in neighborhood 1.9 (0.21-17.34) .56 1.4 (0.21-9.91) .71
Report that it is easy to use recreational facilities on Saturdays and holidays 1.3 (0.08-19.44) .87 1.0 (0.12-7.91) .99

CI indicates confidence interval.
aOdds ratios adjusted at baseline value to compare groups; C is reference group.
bP values for odds ratios are from the generalized estimating equations.

Back to top

*URLs for nonfederal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. URLs do not constitute an endorsement of any organization by CDC or the federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC is not responsible for the content of Web pages found at these URLs.



The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.


Privacy Policy | Accessibility

CDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last reviewed March 22, 2013

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
 HHS logoUnited States Department of
Health and Human Services