|
|
Volume
3:
No. 1, January 2006
SPECIAL TOPIC
Process, Rationale, and Interventions of Pakistan’s National Action Plan on Chronic Diseases
Sania Nishtar, PhD, FRCP, Khalif Mohamud Bile, PhD, Ashfaq Ahmed, MBBS, Azhar M.A. Faruqui,
FRCP, Zafar Mirza, MPH, Samad Shera, FRCP, Abdul Ghaffar, PhD, Fareed A. Minhas,
FRCP, Aslam Khan, FRCP, MRCP, Naeem A. Jaffery, FRCP, Majid Rajput, MPH,
FCPS, Yasir A. Mirza, MSc, Mohammad Aslam, MSc, FCPS, Ejaz Rahim, MA
Suggested citation for this article: Nishtar S, Bile KM, Ahmed A, Faruqui AMA, Mirza Z, Shera S, et al. Process, rationale, and interventions of Pakistan’s National Action Plan on Chronic Diseases. Prev Chron Dis [serial online] 2006 Jan [date cited]. Available from: URL:
http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/
jan/05_0066.htm.
PEER REVIEWED
Abstract
Most developing countries do not comprehensively address chronic diseases as part of their health agendas because of lack of resources, limited capacity within the health system, and the threat that the institution of national-level programs will weaken
local health systems and compete with other health issues. An integrated partnership-based approach, however, could obviate some of these
obstacles.
In Pakistan, a tripartite public–private partnership was developed among the Ministry of Health, the nongovernmental organization (NGO) Heartfile, and World Health Organization. This was the first time an NGO participated in a national health program;
NGOs typically assume a contractual role. The partnership developed a national
integrated plan for health promotion and the prevention
and control of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), which as of January 2006 is in the first stage of implementation. This plan, called the National Action Plan on NCD Prevention, Control, and Health Promotion (NAP-NCD), was released on May 12, 2004, and attempts to obviate
the challenges associated with addressing chronic diseases in countries with limited resources. By developing an integrated
approach to chronic diseases at several levels, capitalizing on the strengths of partnerships, building on existing efforts, and focusing primary health care on chronic disease prevention, the NAP-NCD aims to mitigate the effects of national-level programs on local resources.
The impact of the NAP-NCD on population outcomes can only be assessed over time. However, this article details the plan’s process, its perceived merits, and its limitations in addition to discussing challenges with its implementation, highlighting the value of such partnerships in facilitating the missions and mandates of participating agencies, and suggesting options for
generalizability.
Back to top
Background
Chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are estimated to have caused 33.4 million deaths worldwide in 2002; of these, 72% occurred in developing countries (1). In Pakistan, chronic diseases (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic lung diseases, and cancer) are among the top 10 causes of morbidity and mortality and account for approximately 25% of total deaths (2,3). Thirty-three percent of the adult population older than 45 years
has high blood pressure; 10%
of the adult population older than 18 years has diabetes, and more than 54% of men use tobacco. Data from an unselected autopsy series have shown coronary artery involvement (of greater than 50% luminal diameter
reduction) in more than 24% of those studied. Moreover, the coastal metropolis of Karachi, with a population of more than 15 million, reports one of the highest incidences of breast cancer for any Asian population (4-9). Over the years, Pakistan’s federal and provincial Ministries of Health have been heavily burdened with reproductive-health and infectious-disease issues. However, Pakistan is undergoing an epidemiological transition and, hence, is now
also focusing on chronic diseases.
Pakistan has a population of 150 million and an annual gross national product (GNP) per capita of U.S. $700;
during the last 10 years, 0.6% to 0.8% of its GNP and 5.1% to 11.6% of its development
budget has been spent on the health sector (2). Seventy percent of clinical services are delivered by private-sector health care providers, and out-of-pocket payments are the major source of health
financing, despite the existence of an extensive public-sector–owned health care system. Preventive and
educational services are delivered almost exclusively by the public sector. Lately, as part of certain preventive programs (HIV and AIDS programs in particular), nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) have been delivering preventive care, albeit in a contractual role
in which NGOs enter into contracts with the public sector.
As in most other developing countries, NCDs had not featured prominently on
Pakistan’s health agenda until 2003, when a national integrated plan for health promotion and the prevention
and control of NCDs, known as the National Action
Plan on NCD Prevention, Control, and Health Promotion (NAP-NCD), was initiated.
NAP-NCD attempts to obviate the challenges associated with addressing chronic
diseases in countries with limited resources. Initially, an agreement was
developed between the Ministry of Health and Heartfile, an Islamabad,
Pakistan-based nonprofit, NGO focused on chronic disease
prevention and control and health promotion;
a month later, the World Health
Organization (WHO) was asked to join the initiative. Heartfile’s role in the NAP-NCD
was to advocate for increased focus on chronic disease in the national health
agenda. This was the first time an NGO had participated in a national health program
in more than a contractual role.
The partnership, developed on a national level, was mandated with the task of developing and implementing a strategic plan to prevent and control the rates of NCDs (10).
The NAP-NCP was released on May 12, 2004, within a year of the agreement’s
signing, and
as of January 2006 is in its first phase of implementation (11,12).
Back to top
Developing the Plan
Chronic diseases generally are linked by common risk factors and include cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes, cancer, and chronic lung disease. However, the NAP-NCD also includes injuries and mental illness in its framework because of government requirements.
A three-stage process was used to develop the NAP-NCD: 1) planning within the disease categories, 2) setting priorities, and 3) developing an integrated approach to preventing NCDs (13).
Next, a situational analysis was conducted in which data on current epidemiological evidence for NCDs
were gathered, existing strategies and policy measures were summarized, gaps in the system and opportunities that existed for integration with existing programs
were outlined, and the potential for program implementation was analyzed. Then, a broad-based consultative process was established, which
included health professionals, NGOs, professional societies, community representatives, donor and development agencies, corporations, and legislators, and priority action areas were identified. In the absence of local cost-effectiveness data, other priority-setting criteria were used, such as the extent to which an intervention was locally feasible, promoted community empowerment and
participation, built on the strengths of partnerships, and contributed to capacity building and health systems strengthening. In addition, the capacity of the public health system and the ability of health care leaders to implement the NAP-NCD were also identified as important criteria.
Finally, a tool called the Integrated Framework for Action (IFA) was developed to identify action items that could be applied to all
NCDs (14). (The IFA is available from http://heartfile.org/pdf/IFAPDF.htm*.) Additionally, the IFA included two sets of strategies — those that were common to all NCDs
(Table 1) and those specific to each NCD (Table 2).
The first set of strategies includes behavioral-change communication, focusing health services on NCDs,
development of institutional mechanisms, and
monitoring and surveillance; the second set covers legislative or regulatory matters and research. The IFA — which also provides guidance to administrators and health policy planners — helps set national goals at process, output, and outcome levels; defines integrated actions to meet those goals; and allows for program assessment.
Back to top
Components and Configuration of the NAP-NCD
The NAP-NCD prioritizes a population-based approach to chronic diseases that encompasses public education, behavioral-change communication, legislation, and regulation. These approaches have the greatest potential to reduce NCD risk and uphold the principles of
WHO’s “Health-for-All Policy for the 21st Century” because the
high-risk approach (i.e., targeting individuals at high risk for chronic disease
rather than populations as a whole) may be inaccessible to the majority of the
country’s underprivileged population. Thirty-two percent of Pakistan’s
population is below the poverty level of U.S. $1 a day (15). The NAP-NCD will be implemented in two phases.
First phase
The first phase of implementation, which spans 3 years (May 2004 through July
2006), is jointly funded by the Ministry of Health, Heartfile, and WHO. The implementation status is reviewed
for accountability and program evaluation every 3 months, and progress is posted online (24); the process and output indicators stipulated in the IFA are used for process evaluation. The first phase of the
NAP-NCD’s implementation focuses on the action items summarized in
Tables
1 and 2 and is organized into the following three priority areas:
an integrated and sustainable population-based NCD
surveillance system, an integrated behavioral-change communication strategy, and
legislation in key areas.
An integrated and sustainable population-based NCD
surveillance system is a prerequisite for effective planning, implementation, and evaluation of NCD prevention programs
(with the exception of cancer, because a registry has to be used for its
surveillance) and is regarded as an entry point for activities related to the prevention of NCDs — an approach validated in several settings (16,17). The NAP-NCD’s surveillance model includes population surveillance of primary NCD risk factors (poor diet, physical
inactivity, and
smoking) and combines modules on population surveillance of injuries, mental health, and stroke. In addition, the model has been adapted for program evaluation, which enables it to use indicators to track implementation processes and facilitates an assessment of how interventions work and which components are the most successful. An initial cross-sectional survey with a sample of sufficient size
and the power to detect population-level changes over time of the risk factors and NCDs has been conducted (18,19).
The integrated behavioral-change communication strategy consisted of two interventions. The first intervention included a media campaign
targeting 90% of the country’s population.
The second intervention introduced chronic disease prevention into the work plan of Lady Health Workers (LHWs) — Pakistan’s field force of more than 83,000 grassroots health caregivers.
For the media campaign, 30-second spots and 5-minute programs are being aired
for 2 years during prime time on national television and radio and
began in May and June 2005. One announcement focuses on creating awareness about high blood pressure by advocating opportunistic screening
(i.e., using every clinical encounter “opportunity” to check the blood
pressure of every patient); the other emphasizes the principles of
cardiovascular disease prevention.
Until recently, LHWs were involved in delivering reproductive-health– and communicable-disease–related services to poor and underprivileged households in rural areas covering 50% of Pakistan’s population. Heartfile
had previously pilot tested an approach in which CVD prevention was introduced into its
work plan in the Lodhran
district as part of a CVD prevention demonstration project. Seven hundred LHWs
were involved in this pilot project from 2001 through 2003 (20,21).
Lessons learned from this experience have enabled the introduction of the
chronic disease perspective into the training module in addition to an increased
focus on chronic disease in 17 other districts as part of the NAP-NCD.
Other priority areas for the first phase of implementation include lobbying for key legislative actions, identifying research areas, building capacity within the health system, and focusing on institutional measures.
Second phase
The second phase of implementation will broaden the scope to include measures that focus health services on prevention;
the launch of the second phase is planned for 2006. The second phase will have implications for training and capacity building of health professionals, improving basic infrastructure, and ensuring availability and access to certain drugs at all levels of health care.
Health care delivery in Pakistan is characterized by a variety of roles played by different categories of health care providers,
and all will be drawn into the loop. The NAP-NCD makes recommendations to ensure physician training as a permanent function of the health care system by establishing links with provincial and district health departments;
it also makes recommendations on how to form a
comprehensive continuing medical education program structured around broad-based
prevention-related goals and objectives to ensure ongoing training for both private-sector and pubic-sector physicians. The second phase of the NAP-NCD
will also include other legislative actions.
Back to top
Merits and Limitations of the Approach
The NAP-NCD presents one approach to developing a national strategy for chronic diseases in countries with limited resources. The strategy
includes integration at six distinct levels. By grouping chronic diseases and integrating actions, there is a shift from a national-level approach to an approach based on diseases, which has significant implications for maximizing
health care resources. Horizontally integrating actions with existing initiatives strengthens the public health system; adopting integrated models on surveillance and behavioral-change communication in addition to focusing health services on NCDs will yield important empirical evidence for emerging chronic disease programs. Additionally, integrating health promotion and prevention within the same
program achieves two objectives for two populations with common activities.
The evaluation mechanism of this model, which is structured within the accountability and progress charts of the IFA, allows program assessment at a process-and-outcomes level and assessment of the level of contribution partners have made to achieve the NAP-NCD’s objectives.
This program is of value to all partners. By leveraging the strengths of the nonprofit private-sector technical partner (Heartfile), the government included NCD prevention in its policies. NGOs and the civil society can contribute to achieving national goals; however, this potential remains largely untapped. This model provides a mechanism for engaging NGOs in the national decision-making process and ensures their participation both in the formulation of health policy and implementation of national plans. Though an evaluation mechanism, it also enables the assessment of each partner’s contribution to achieving objectives. In this model, WHO is gaining experience with a model in which WHO resources — which are otherwise allocated for the public
sector — support the private sector in a national model. The partnership is therefore integrated with national health priorities and complements state initiatives.
This program is one of the few examples of a public–private partnership for chronic disease prevention, an area that has largely remained unexplored as part of global efforts to build public–private partnerships. This program’s implementation is expected to yield important information about the performance of the health system by building chronic disease partnerships
in evidence-based models. As for infectious disease partnerships, ethical, methodological, accountability, sustainability, and governance issues must be
considered (22-25).
This initiative also created a mechanism for visible involvement and participation of many other stakeholders in the national consultation process
in addition to avenues for their participation in the process of implementation. This is important
because many factors that affect NCDs are outside of the health sector domain; these include trade, agriculture, finance, education, and communication.
However, there is also the need to fit this strategy within a more explicit policy framework
— one that makes it obligatory to link relevant health ministries in a manner that is mutually supportive of national NCD goals. The program needs to be supported by a clear, strong, and sustained political commitment.
The NAP-NCD can serve as both an empirical basis for an integrated approach to NCDs and an experimental basis of health sector reform in the area of public–private collaboration; most developing countries have limited experience with each. It is also likely to yield useful lessons for
ministries of health, NGOs, and multilateral agencies for establishing chronic disease programs in
developing countries.
Back to top
Author Information
Corresponding Author: Sania Nishtar, FRCP, PhD, President, Heartfile, 1 Park Rd; Chak Shahzad, Islamabad, Pakistan. Telephone:
+0092-51-224-3580. E-mail: sania@heartfile.org.
Author Affiliations: Khalif Mohamud Bile, PhD, World Health Organization
(WHO), Islamabad, Pakistan; Ashfaq Ahmed, MBBS, Office of International Health,
Ministry of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan; Azhar M.A. Faruqui,
FRCP, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Karachi, Pakistan; Zafar Mirza, MPH,
Network for Consumer Protection, Islamabad, Pakistan; Samad Shera, FRCP,
Diabetes Association of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan; Abdul Ghaffar, PhD, Global Forum for
Health Research, Geneva, Switzerland; Fareed A. Minhas,
FRCP, WHO Collaborating Centre for Psychiatry, Rawalpindi, Pakistan; Aslam Khan, FRCP, MRCP,
Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan; Naeem A. Jaffery, FRCP, Ziauddin
Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan; Majid Rajput, MPH, FCPS, Office of the
Director General Health, Ministry of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan; Yasir A. Mirza,
MSc, Mohammad Aslam, MSc,
FCPS, Communications Department, Heartfile, Islamabad, Pakistan; Ejaz Rahim, MA,
Office of the Secretary of Health, Ministry of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Back to top
References
- World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2003 — shaping the
future. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
- Federal Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division. Pakistan Demographic Survey 2001. Islamabad, Pakistan: Government of Pakistan; 2003.
- Hyder AA, Morrow RH. Lost healthy life years in Pakistan in 1990. Am J Public Health 2000;90(8):1235-40.
- Sattar AB, Khan B. Atherosclerosis in Karachi; a study of an unselected autopsy
series. Part 1. J Pak Med Assoc 1967;17:245.
- Rashid H, Jafery NA. Atherosclerosis in Karachi; a study of an unselected autopsy
series. Part 2. J Pak Med Assoc 1967;17:252.
- Shera AS, Rafique G, Khwaja IA, Ara J, Baqai S, King H.
Pakistan National Diabetes Survey: prevalence of glucose intolerance and associated factors in Shikarpur, Sindh province. Diabet Med 1995;12(12):1116-21.
- Pakistan Medical Research Council. Pakistan Health Education Survey. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Medical Research Council; 2003.
- Pakistan Medical Research Council. National Health Survey of Pakistan 1990-94. Islamabad, Pakistan: Pakistan Medical Research Council, Network Publication Service; 1998.
- Bhurgri Y, Bhurgri A, Hasan SH, Usman A, Faridi N, Khurshid M, et al.
Cancer patterns in Karachi division (1998-1999). J Pak Med Assoc 2002;52(6):244-6.
- National Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases
and Health Promotion in Pakistan. Heartfile: memorandum of understanding
[Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Action Plan for Prevention and Control
of Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion in Pakistan [cited 2004 Nov
11]. Available from: URL:
http://heartfile.org/napmou.htm*.
- National Action Plan for Non-Communicable Disease Prevention and Health Promotion in Pakistan
[Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Action Plan for Non-Communicable
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion in Pakistan [cited 2004 Nov 11].
Available from: URL:
http://heartfile.org/napdoc.pdf*.
- Nishtar S.
Prevention of non-communicable diseases in Pakistan: an integrated partnership-based model. Health Res Policy Syst 2004;2:7.
- National Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases
and Health Promotion in Pakistan. Heartfile: process of developing the national
action plan [Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Action Plan for Prevention
and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion in Pakistan [cited
2004 Nov 11]. Available from: URL:
http://heartfile.org/napprocess.htm*.
- National Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases
and Health Promotion in Pakistan. Heartfile: integrated framework for action
[Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Action Plan for Prevention and Control
of Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion in Pakistan [cited 2004 Nov
11]. Available from: URL:
http://heartfile.org/NAPIFA.pdf*.
- Statistics Division. Economic Survey of Pakistan 2004. Islamabad, Pakistan: Government of Pakistan; 2004.
- World Health Organization. STEPwise approach to surveillance (STEPS)
[Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization [cited 2003 Dec 31].
Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/ncd_surveillance/steps.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
(BRFSS) [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[cited 2004 May 6]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/.
- National Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases
and Health Promotion in Pakistan. Heartfile: national action plan — surveillance
[Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Action Plan for Prevention and Control
of Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion in Pakistan [cited 2004 Nov
11]. Available from: URL:
http://heartfile.org/napsurv.htm*.
- Nishtar S, Amjad A, Iqbal A. Integrated population-based surveillance of non-communicable diseases — the Pakistan Model.
Am J Prev Med. Forthcoming.
- National Action Plan for Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases
and Health Promotion in Pakistan. Heartfile Lodhran CVD prevention project
[Internet]. Islamabad, Pakistan: National Action Plan for Prevention and Control
of Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion in Pakistan [cited 2004 Nov
6]. Available from: URL: http://heartfile.org/lodhran.htm#4*.
- Nishtar S, Badar A, Kamalm MU, Larik Z, Shah T, Bajwa R, et al. The Heartfile Lodhran CVD
prevention project — end of project intermediate outcome evaluation. Promotion
and Education. Forthcoming.
- Health Action International Europe. Statement to 109th WHO Executive Board meeting; January 2002
[Internet]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Health Action International Europe; 2002
[cited 2004 Jun 22]. Available from: URL: http://www.haiweb.org/campaign/PPI/EB109statement.html*.
- Nishtar S.
Public-private
‘partnerships’ in health — a global call to action. Health Res Policy Syst 2004;2:5.
- Widdus R.
Public-private partnerships for health require thoughtful evaluation. Bull World Health Organ 2003;81(4):235.
- Initiative on Public-Private Partnerships for Health [homepage on the
Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: Initiative on Public-Private Partnerships for
Health [cited 2004 Jun 22]. Available from: URL: http://www.ippph.org*.
Back to top
|
|
