6: No. 1, January 2009
Self-Rated Depression and Physician-Diagnosed Depression and Anxiety in Florida Adults: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006
Amy Z. Fan, MD, PhD, Tara W. Strine, MS, Youjie Huang, PhD, Melissa R. Murray, MS, Senyoni Musingo, PhD, Ruth Jiles, PhD, Ali H. Mokdad, PhD
Suggested citation for this article: Fan AZ, Strine TW, Huang Y, Murray MR, Musingo S, Jiles R,
et al. Self-rated depression and physician-diagnosed depression and anxiety in Florida adults: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2006. Prev Chronic Dis 2009;6(1):A10.
Our purpose was to determine the prevalence and correlates of self-reported
symptoms of depression and physician-diagnosed depression and anxiety in Florida adults
by using the 2006 Florida Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
The BRFSS is an ongoing, state-based telephone health survey of
noninstitutionalized adults that uses random-digit dialing. In 2006, an Anxiety and Depression Module was administered in Florida. Eight questions were used to examine current depression. Two additional questions assessed health care provider diagnosis of depressive and anxiety disorders. We used SUDAAN
version 9.0 to evaluate the data to accommodate the complex sampling design.
Approximately 9% of Florida adults experienced current depression; about 13% had
had a diagnosis of depression in their lifetime and 11% had a diagnosis of anxiety
in their lifetime. Approximately 44% of respondents with current depression had not
had a diagnosis of depression. Current depression and lifetime diagnosis of depression and anxiety were independently associated with sociodemographic variables (being
a woman, young, previously married or never married, or unemployed or unable to work), adverse health behaviors (current or
former smoking, physical inactivity, or obesity), and chronic health conditions (history of a stroke, diabetes, or asthma).
Although the prevalence of depression among non-Hispanic blacks and people with
low education levels is higher, members of these groups are less likely than
members of other sociodemographic groups to have had depression diagnosed by a physician.
Depression and anxiety are associated with sociodemographic disadvantages and chronic conditions and risk factors.
Knowing the prevalence of depression and anxiety, both self-rated and
physician-diagnosed, is useful in identifying unmet mental health needs among subpopulations.
Back to top
Mental health problems and illnesses affect 1 in 5 Americans (1,2). In fact, mental illness is the second leading cause of disability and premature mortality
in the United States (1,2). Depression and anxiety, both common mental disorders, have been associated with an increased prevalence of chronic disease and unhealthy lifestyles (3-6).
Both the National Comorbidity Survey and the National Health and Nutrition
Examination Survey (NHANES) provide national-level prevalence estimates of depression and other mental disorders (7,8). However, state- and local-level data are lacking and may be more helpful in planning mental health services
for local populations. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is an ongoing, state-based, telephone health survey
of noninstitutionalized US adults that is conducted by random-digit dialing (9,10). The BRFSS collects data on sociodemographic characteristics, chronic illness, health behaviors, access to health care, and other health-related information. Given its large sample size, the BRFSS can produce local, state, and national estimates.
BRFSS used the measure of frequent mental distress (FMD), defined as 14 or more mentally unhealthy days during the past 30 days, to represent the
extent of perceived mental distress. State-level prevalence estimates of FMD
have been reported previously (11). However, this measure does not provide
prevalence estimates for common diagnosable mental illnesses. The Patient Health
Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) is a well-validated, self-reported, diagnostic and
severity measure of depression designed for use in primary care (12,13). Its
sensitivity and specificity are comparable to those of other depression measures
that are twice as long. As part of the 2006 Data Infrastructure Grants from the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, state health departments, in collaboration with state
mental health agencies and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), implemented an Anxiety and Depression Module (ADM) (8 of the 10 items of ADM were the PHQ-8) in 38 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands
by using an independent probability sample of adults aged 18 years or older.
Our study is based on the data collected in Florida and is designed to determine the prevalence of self-rated depression and physician-diagnosed depression and anxiety in Florida; examine a wide array of variables associated with depression and anxiety, including sociodemographic
characteristics, chronic conditions, and unhealthy behaviors; and identify the
subpopulations most vulnerable to depression and anxiety but less likely to be
diagnosed by physicians. The findings will improve our understanding of
disparities in mental health problems and mental health services in Florida.
Back to top
The BRFSS methods, including the weighting procedure, are described elsewhere (9). All BRFSS questionnaires, data, and reports are available at www.cdc.gov/brfss.
The Florida BRFSS is a stratified random sampling survey. The sample is drawn from 3 strata defined by county population size and 1 stratum allocated for areas with at least 45% minority households. The survey’s implementation follows CDC protocol. In 2006, Florida BRFSS surveyed 10,726 respondents;
the survey response rate was 51.2%. Among these, 10,283 answered the questions in the ADM.
Self-rated current depression
The PHQ-8 is adapted from the PHQ-9 (12,13).
PHQ-9 consists of the actual 9 criteria
for a diagnosis of depressive disorders, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) (14). PHQ-9
has been validated among racially and ethnically diverse populations in primary
care (15) and for telephone administration (16). In PHQ-8, the question assessing suicidal or self-injurious ideation from PHQ-9 was eliminated because intervention over the telephone is impossible and thoughts of self-harm are uncommon in the general population (13). Research indicated
that PHQ-8 has operating characteristics similar to those of PHQ-9 and is an acceptable alternative to PHQ-9 (13).
We standardized the response set of the PHQ-8 to be similar to other BRFSS questions by asking the number of days in the previous 2 weeks the person had experienced a particular depressive symptom. This modification was approved by the original authors of
PHQ-8. For analytic purposes, the modified response set can be converted back to the original response set: 0 to 1 days = “not at all,” 2 to 6 days = “several days,” 7 to 11 days = “more than half the days,” and 12 to 14 days = “nearly
every day,” with 0 to 3 points assigned to the 4 categories, respectively. Item scores are summed for a total score of 0 to 24. A score
from 0 to 4 represents no
meaningful depressive symptoms; 5 to 9, mild depression; 10 to 14, moderate depression; 15 to 19, moderately severe depression; and 20 to 24, severe depression (12). For this study, the definition of current depression is a total score
of at least 10.
Lifetime diagnosis of depression and anxiety
The remaining 2 questions of the ADM assess health care professional diagnoses of depressive and anxiety disorders: “Has a doctor or other health care provider
EVER told you that you have an anxiety disorder (including acute stress disorder, anxiety, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic attacks, panic disorder, phobia, posttraumatic stress disorder, or social anxiety disorder)?” and “Has a doctor or other health care provider EVER told you that you have a
depressive disorder (including depression, major depression, dysthymia, or minor depression)?” Possible responses include “yes,” “no,” “don’t know/not sure,” and “refused.” The prevalence of lifetime diagnosis of anxiety or depression was calculated as the proportion of
people who answered “yes” to the question.
Sociodemographic variables included sex, race or ethnicity, age group, marital status, employment status, and health care coverage.
Health care coverage was assessed by asking whether the respondent had health care coverage, including health insurance, prepaid plans such as
health maintenance organizations, or government plans such as Medicare.
Unhealthy behaviors included smoking (current, former), physical inactivity (yes/no), binge drinking (yes/no), and heavy drinking (yes/no). Respondents were considered current smokers if they had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetimes and currently smoked. Former smokers were those who had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetimes and currently did not smoke. Adults were considered physically inactive if they had not participated in any leisure-time
physical activity or exercise during the previous 30 days. Consistent with the 2005 dietary guidelines of the US Department of Agriculture and the US Department of Health and Human Services (17), heavy drinkers were defined as men who reported drinking more than 2 drinks per day and women who reported drinking more than 1 drink per day. Binge drinkers were defined as men
who had 5 or more drinks on 1 occasion and women who had 4 or more drinks on 1 occasion during the previous 30 days.
Chronic health conditions included obesity and having been diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, diabetes, or asthma. Body mass index (BMI = mass [kg] divided by height squared [m2]) was determined from self-reported height and weight. Adults were considered obese if their BMI was
30 kg/m2 or more. CHD was defined on the basis of an affirmative response to either of the following
questions: “Has a doctor, nurse, or health care professional ever told you that you have had a heart attack, also called myocardial infarction?” or “Has a doctor, nurse, or health care professional ever told you that you have angina or coronary heart disease (CHD)?” Stroke was assessed by the question, “Has a doctor, nurse, or health care professional ever told you that you have had a stroke?” Diabetes status was assessed by the question, “Have you ever been told by a doctor that you have
diabetes?” People who responded “yes” were considered to have diabetes. Those who responded “yes, but only during pregnancy” or “prediabetes or borderline diabetes” were considered not to have diabetes. People were considered to have asthma if they responded “yes” to the question, “Have you ever been told by a doctor, nurse, or other health professional that you had asthma?”
We calculated the prevalence of current depression and lifetime diagnosis of depression and anxiety for groups with selected demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. The prevalence of selected chronic conditions and behavioral risk factors by depression and anxiety status was analyzed to examine the comorbidity of depression with chronic conditions and their risk factors. We used multivariate logistic regression to estimate adjusted prevalence odds ratios (APOR) and their 95%
confidence intervals after adjustment for all proposed correlates of depression and anxiety. A probability less than .05 was considered statistically significant. We used SUDAAN
version 9.0 (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina) to accommodate the complex sampling design of BRFSS. The results were weighted to represent the distribution of Florida adults.
Back to top
A total of 10,283 Florida adults responded to the BRFSS survey. Approximately 9% of
respondents reported experiencing depression at the time of the survey. More than 13% of
respondents had been diagnosed with depression by physicians and 11.2% had been diagnosed with anxiety at some point during their lifetimes. Current depression was significantly correlated with lifetime diagnosis of depression (r = 0.37) and anxiety (r = 0.31). In addition, a lifetime diagnosis of depression
was significantly correlated with lifetime diagnosis of anxiety (r = 0.50). Approximately 82% of
respondents (87% of men, 79% of women) did not have a lifetime diagnosis of depression or current depression; about 9% had a lifetime diagnosis but were not currently depressed; approximately 5%
had a lifetime diagnosis and were currently depressed; and approximately 4% were currently depressed without a lifetime diagnosis. Thus,
approximately 44% of the respondents with depression had not been
diagnosed by physicians. Prevalence estimates of current depression and of lifetime diagnosis of depression and anxiety
were examined by selected sociodemographic characteristics (Table 1).
People with depression were more often current smokers (45% vs 19%) and physically inactive (45% vs 22%)
than were people without depression (Table 2). The prevalence of chronic conditions such as obesity (33% vs 21%),
CHD (12% vs 7%), stroke (7% vs 3%), diabetes (14% vs 8%), and asthma (24% vs 10%) was also higher among adults with current depression. The differences in chronic conditions and unhealthy behaviors based on the status of lifetime diagnosis of depression
and anxiety followed a similar pattern but with smaller differences. Most differences were significant except for binge drinking in association with lifetime diagnosis of depression and heavy drinking in association with lifetime diagnosis of anxiety (Table 2).
We performed logistic regression models with sociodemographic variables, chronic health conditions, and unhealthy behaviors as covariates. Both current depression and lifetime diagnosis of depression and anxiety were independently associated with being
a woman, young, previously married or never married, unemployed or unable to work, being a current or former smoker, being physically inactive, being obese, ever having a stroke, or ever having asthma
(Table 3). Neither health
care coverage nor
a diagnosis of CHD was significant in the multivariate models; therefore, we
dropped it from the final model. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic
blacks and Hispanics were less likely to have a lifetime diagnosis of depression
or anxiety. However, no significant difference was found between racial/ethnic
groups in prevalence of current depression. A similar discrepancy also exists
for education levels. People who did not complete high school were more likely
to be currently depressed than those who had at least some college education. In
contrast, they were not more likely or were even slightly less likely to have a
lifetime diagnosis of depression or anxiety than those with at least some
college education. People with a high school education were less likely to have
a diagnosis of anxiety than those with at least some college, although no
significant difference was detected for current depression between these 2
Back to top
Our finding that 44% of currently depressed respondents had not obtained a diagnosis indicates that the measure of obtained lifetime diagnosis alone underestimated the actual mental health burden of adults in Florida. Our analysis provides further evidence that depression among some subpopulations is likely to be underestimated.
Racial minorities and people with low education levels were less likely to report a diagnosis of depression, in spite of higher or equivalent
prevalence of current depression, which indicated that they were less likely to
seek professional mental health service for diagnosis and treatment.
Our study identified adults who are most vulnerable to current depression:
women, young to middle-aged adults, people with less than a high school education, those previously married or never married, and those currently unemployed or unable to work. Most of the findings are consistent with previous findings (11,18,19). These adults may disproportionately make up the majority of people with diagnosable mental disorders who do not seek help or receive treatment because of the stigma
associated with mental illness, lack of knowledge, or lack of adequate insurance coverage (1,2). These disparities
must be considered when
planning efforts to promote mental health and treat mental disorders in Florida.
Reports on the prevalence of mental health problems and their effect on different racial/ethnic groups are mixed (18). Inconsistent findings on racial differences in the rates and nature of depression are probably due to methodologic differences (7,20). The Surgeon General’s report concluded that 1 in 5 Americans
experience mental health problems regardless of race or ethnicity (1,2). Our study found no racial/ethnic difference in the prevalence of current depression. However,
there is evidence that Americans do not share equally in the hope of recovery from mental illness. Racial and ethnic minorities collectively experience greater disability from mental illness than do whites (2),
possibly because minorities receive less and poorer quality of care and not
because their illness is more severe or prevalent (2).
This study indicated that depression and anxiety are independently associated with unhealthy lifestyles (eg, current or former smoking, physical inactivity) and other chronic health conditions (eg, obesity, history of a stroke, diabetes, asthma). These findings are consistent with previous BRFSS reports
that used frequent mental distress as the mental health measure and other studies
that used data from different sources (6,18,21-25). Although CHD was not retained in multivariate logistic
regression, probably because of close correlations with other covariates (especially diabetes, stroke, and physical inactivity) in the model, it does not mean
that this condition is not associated with depression or anxiety (26). As shown by the bivariate analysis
(Table 2), people with a history of CHD had a higher prevalence of self-rated and physician-diagnosed depression and anxiety.
This study used a depression severity score greater than or equal to 10 to define current depression. PHQ-8 can also be used as a diagnostic screener for major depression (12). More detailed analysis can also classify a target population as having none, mild, moderate, moderately severe, or severe depression. Different treatment actions have been proposed based on the depression severity (12). The PHQ depression scale
can be used not only as a surveillance tool for population prevalence
estimates and trends but also for planning interventions when used in primary care and other clinical settings.
This study also demonstrated that the BRFSS is an effective source for data on the mental illness burden of a
state population. However, the findings in this report are subject to some limitations. First, the information was self-reported in a telephone survey. The bias caused by inaccurate recall or self-denial cannot be assessed. Second, nearly 10% of the sample was missing 1 or more of the 8
items in the PHQ-8, so they were omitted in the estimate calculation of current depression based on the PHQ-8 summary score. The prevalence of current depression may be underestimated because those with missing data were potentially more likely to experience depression. Third, data were collected from noninstitutionalized adult residents with landline telephones and might not be generalizable to the homeless, people
who use cell phones exclusively, or those residing in institutions such as
residential treatment centers, jails, shelters, and hospitals, where mental disorders are more prevalent.
BRFSS is planning to
implement cell-phone surveys to supplement the regular landline survey. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of the survey prevents any causal inference between depression/anxiety and physical health conditions and lifestyles. Nonetheless, the findings corroborate numerous
reports that document the presence of mental health disorders with chronic conditions and unhealthy lifestyles (3,22,23). Thus, amelioration of depression and anxiety may improve the prognosis of chronic diseases, and better control of chronic conditions might improve mental health.
The President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (27) envisioned “a
future when mental illnesses can be prevented or cured, a future when mental
illnesses are detected early, and a future when everyone with a mental illness
at any stage of life has access to effective treatment and supports — essentials
for living, working, learning, and participating fully in the community.” Early
mental health screening, assessment, and referral to services are not yet common
practice in primary care and public health care settings. In addition,
depression and anxiety are present with chronic health conditions and unhealthy lifestyles; mental health intervention
should thus be an essential component of lifestyle modification in chronic care management.
The PHQ-8 is a useful tool for characterizing the burden of depression in the general population at the state level. The combination of measures of self-experience and obtained diagnosis can be used to identify unmet mental health needs in the general population. The Florida data confirm
that rates of depression and other mental health disorders are increasing among both men and women in recent US birth cohorts (28,29).
More efforts are needed to
eliminate disparities and to increase the availability of and access to mental health services for Florida adults.
Back to top
Corresponding Author: Amy Z. Fan, MD, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Mailstop K-66, Atlanta, GA 30341. Telephone: 770-488-5327. E-mail:
Author Affiliations: Tara W. Strine, Ruth Jiles, Ali H. Mokdad, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Youjie Huang, Melissa R. Murray, Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, Florida; Senyoni Musingo, Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee, Florida.
Back to top
- Mental health: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.
- Mental health: culture, race, and ethnicity. A supplement to mental health: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.
- Chapman DP, Perry GS, Strine TW. The vital link between chronic disease and depressive disorders. Prev Chronic Dis 2005;2(1).
Accessed November 23, 2007.
- Hansen S.
Mental health issues associated with cardiovascular disease in women. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2003;26(3):693-712.
- Hocking LB, Koenig HG.
Anxiety in medically ill older patients: a review and update. Int J Psychiatry Med 1995;25(3):221-38.
- Strine TW, Balluz L, Chapman DP, Moriarty DG, Owens M, Mokdad AH.
Risk behaviors and healthcare coverage among adults by frequent mental distress status, 2001. Am J Prev Med 2004;26(3):213-6.
- Riolo SA, Nguyen TA, Greden JF, King CA.
Prevalence of depression by race/ethnicity: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III.
Am J Public Health 2005;95(6):998-1000.
- Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE.
Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62(6):617-27.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System user’s guide. Atlanta (GA): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2005. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Data/Brfss/userguide.pdf. Accessed
November 23, 2007.
- Mokdad AH, Stroup DF, Giles WH, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team.
Public health surveillance for behavioral risk factors in a changing environment. Recommendations from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Team. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52(RR-9):1-12.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Self-reported frequent mental distress among adults — United States, 1993-2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(41):963-6.
- Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Berry JT, Mokdad AH.
PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. J
Affect Disord 2008 Aug 25 [Epub ahead of print].
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann 2002;32(9):1-7.
- Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition,
text revision. Arlington (VA): American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
- Huang FY, Chung H, Kroenke K, Delucchi KL, Spitzer RL.
Using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to measure depression among racially and ethnically diverse primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med 2006;21(6):547-52.
- Pinto-Meza A, Serrano-Blanco A, Peñarrubia
MT, Blanco E, Haro JM.
Assessing depression in primary care with the PHQ-9: can it be carried out
over the telephone? J Gen Intern Med 2005;20(8):738-42.
- Alcoholic beverages. In: Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2005. Washington (DC): US Department of
Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture; 2005. http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2005/document/pdf/chapter9.pdf.
Accessed November 23, 2007.
- Rohrer JE, Pierce JR Jr, Blackburn C.
Lifestyle and mental health. Prev Med 2005;40(4):438-43.
- Ahluwalia IB, Holtzman D, Mack KA, Mokdad A.
Health-related quality of life among women of reproductive age: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 1998-2001. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003;12(1):5-9.
- Somervell PD, Leaf PJ, Weissman MM, Blazer DG, Bruce ML.
The prevalence of major depression in black and white adults in five United States communities. Am J Epidemiol 1989;130(4):725-35.
- De Moor MH, Beem AL, Stubbe JH, Boomsma DI, De Geus EJ.
Regular exercise, anxiety, depression and personality: a population-based study. Prev Med 2006;42(4):273-9.
- Strine TW, Beckles GL, Okoro CA, Balluz L, Mokdad A.
Prevalence of CVD risk factors among adults with diabetes by mental distress status. Am J Health Behav 2004;28(5):464-70.
- Strine TW, Greenlund KJ, Brown DW, Mokdad A, Balluz L.
Characteristics of people aged 45 years or older with heart disease by frequent mental distress status, 2001. Prev Med 2004;39(1):191-6.
- Zielinski TA, Brown ES.
Depression in patients with asthma. Adv Psychosom Med 2003;24:42-50.
- Whyte EM, Mulsant BH, Rovner BW, Reynolds CF.
Preventing depression after stroke. Int Rev Psychiatry 2006;18(5):471-81.
- Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F.
Recent evidence linking coronary heart disease and depression. Can J Psychiatry 2006;51(12):730-7.
- Achieving the promise: transforming mental health care in America. Rockville (MD): President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health; 2003. http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/FinalReport/downloads/ExecSummary.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2007.
- Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Swartz M, Blazer DG.
Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey. II: Cohort effects. J Affect Disord 1994;30(1):15-26.
- Klerman GL, Weissman MM.
Increasing rates of depression. JAMA 1989;261(15):2229-35.
Back to top