Volume 5: No.
2, April 2008
TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
A Purchaser’s Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: A Tool to Improve Health Care Coverage for Prevention
Dyann M. Matson Koffman, DrPH, MPH, CHES, Andrew Lanza, MPH, MSW,
Kathryn Phillips Campbell, MPH
Suggested citation for this article: Matson Koffman DM, Lanza A, Campbell KP. A purchaser’s guide to clinical preventive services: a tool to improve health care coverage for prevention. Prev Chronic Dis 2008;5(2).
apr/07_0220.htm. Accessed [date].
In 2005, representatives from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention partnered with the National Business Group on Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to form a work group for developing A Purchaser’s Guide to
Clinical Preventive Services: Moving Science into Coverage. This guide, designed as a tool for employers, describes recommended clinical preventive services for 46 conditions. The guide includes the scientific evidence and benefits language that
employers need to include comprehensive clinical preventive services in their medical benefit plans.
The work group determined that the guide would address conditions that 1) affected a large percentage of the working population, 2) were costly to control, and 3) had well-defined and accepted recommendations for preventive services. Subject matter experts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Business Group on Health, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality developed or reviewed statements of scientific evidence for 46 diseases and conditions.
The Purchaser’s Guide, written for an employer audience, includes descriptions for recommended clinical preventive services and their cost savings, syntheses of supporting evidence, strategies for prioritization, and recommendations to improve the delivery and use of preventive services. Twelve hundred copies were sent to more than 275 members of the National Business Group on Health and other purchasers of health care; training sessions on the Guide were held for 228
business leaders, health benefit consultants, and health plan administrators; and an online version was created through the Web sites of the National Business Group on Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The online version has received more than 260,000 hits since its release.
In 2007, the National Business Group on Health reported that some Fortune 500 companies will be using the Purchaser’s Guide when negotiating their health benefit contracts and developing their health care strategies. Further research is under way to determine whether the Guide influences employers to purchase recommended clinical preventive services.
Back to top
Researchers estimate that 75% of all health care costs stem from preventable chronic health conditions, yet only 1% of the money spent on health care in the United States is devoted to protecting health and preventing illness and injury (1-3). In addition, chronic health conditions result in substantial indirect costs for employers, such as lost productivity, absenteeism, and turnover (1). As Americans’ health care expenditures continue to increase, strategies that reduce the
prevalence and cost of preventable diseases become important. Prevention, early detection, and management of diseases can improve our nation’s health and reduce health care costs (3).
Clinical preventive services, such as screenings, and counseling and treatment for risk factors such as hypertension, lipid disorders, and tobacco use, can help people avoid disease and reduce their health risks. Yet health care
insurance benefits have historically been designed to address the treatment of diseases, not their prevention (4). National studies have found that adults
in the United States receive approximately 55% of the recommended preventive care (4,5).
A 1997 survey of 3156 employers revealed that most employer-sponsored health plans did not cover many of the recommended clinical preventive services (6). In a more recent study
that used 2001 data from 2180 employers, coverage of physical examinations, immunizations, and screenings generally exceeded 50%. Coverage of services
that involved lifestyle modification (e.g., nutrition counseling) was less than 20%, however, even though employers understood the relationship between increased
productivity, decreased health care costs, and coverage for clinical preventive services. In reality, employers in this study were least likely to cover the services that were most likely to result in a return on their investment (7). Another concern is that employers who do cover preventive services often use vague contract language (7-8).
Coverage for preventive care can determine whether people receive preventive services (9,10). For example, a national study of more than 1600 women found that women without health insurance had a worse risk factor profile for cardiovascular disease and used health care services less frequently than
did those with health insurance (11). Another study of U.S. workers found that higher-wage workers were more likely than lower-wage
workers to have health insurance
and health-related benefits and to use preventive services (12). The absence of coverage can also have a serious effect on
whether physicians offer clinical preventive services. In one study, 31% of physicians reported
that they sometimes did not offer services to their patients because of perceived coverage restrictions (13).
Conversely, improvements in insurance coverage may increase access to, and use of, preventive health services (9,14-16). For example, several years after Medicare began covering preventive services, older adults without supplemental coverage were approximately 10% less likely to use preventive services such as cholesterol testing than those who had supplemental coverage (17).
In terms of behavioral health, managed health plans increasingly include coverage for prevention and
health promotion services (18). Even though employers understand the need to prevent illness and disability, they rarely cover important preventive benefits, and they may not follow evidence-based recommendations (7).
Faced with rising health care costs, an aging workforce, and global competition,
employers are more reliant on retaining employees in the workplace past
retirement age and on keeping all their employees healthy, productive, and
In response to these issues, in 2006 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Business Group on Health (NBGH), in collaboration with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), developed A Purchaser’s Guide to
Clinical Preventive Services: Moving Science into Coverage (19). This document is a comprehensive tool for employers, particularly those who make decisions about which health benefits to purchase. It provides guidance for the selection of
clinical preventive services and ways to manage disease risk that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), CDC, and other authoritative organizations have determined are effective.
The guide includes the scientific evidence and benefits language that employers
need to include comprehensive clinical preventive services in their medical
The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the Purchaser’s Guide and how to use it. We use a scenario
that illustrates how an employer with several thousand employees might use the
guide, and we highlight the recommended clinical preventive services and strategies that promote their delivery and use.
Back to top
In February 2005, representatives from CDC, in partnership with NBGH, discussed the feasibility of developing a decision support tool to assist managers of employee benefits and human resources in selecting and defining the appropriate
benefits for clinical preventive services for their employees, dependents, and
retirees. Through its established relationship with the NBGH, CDC learned that
even NBGH members that were sophisticated and global Fortune 500 companies
lacked the information to select, define, and implement evidence-based
preventive services as benefits. NBGH members requested information about clinical preventive services
that would improve their employees’ health and ultimately reduce associated
health care costs. At the same time, an emerging movement toward
consumer-directed health plans and health savings accounts (HSAs) has required employers to specify the clinical preventive services they will cover at no cost to their beneficiaries; this
practice is known as “safe-harbor” coverage.
For these reasons, we decided to develop a document to guide businesses in the selection of clinical preventive services.
Representatives from the CDC and NBGH formed a work group to develop the Purchaser’s Guide. Members determined that the guide would address conditions that 1) affected a large percentage of the working population, 2) were costly to control, and 3) had a well-defined and accepted recommendation for preventive service. In the summer of 2005, the work group made three important tactical decisions. First, it included AHRQ to provide guidance and direction.
Second, it expanded
the inclusion criteria to all USPSTF A and B recommendations (20). Third, the group decided on a standard format for each chapter, which significantly improved the readability and consistency of information in the
Beginning in the summer of 2005 and going through the early fall of 2006, the work group appointed subject matter experts, NBGH staff, or both to write evidence statements for 46
health conditions and for other chapters. The writers also developed specific benefit language, known as summary plan descriptions (SPDs).
Employers and managers in employee benefits or human resources need SPDs to
ensure that they include a comprehensive clinical preventive services program in their medical benefit plan. Work group
members extensively reviewed each chapter, submitted the evidence statements through the CDC clearance process, and delivered the text to NBGH for final printing. In August 2006, approximately 12 employers, consultants, and experts in prevention reviewed a draft of the guide; their feedback was used in making revisions before the guide was published.
Back to top
At a press conference held on November 28, 2006, the executive leadership of NBGH, CDC, and AHRQ released the
Purchaser’s Guide and sent 1200 copies to more than 275 NBGH
members and other purchasers of health care. Three “webinars” (seminars on the Web), training sessions, and presentations for
228 NBGH business leaders, health benefits consultants, and health plan
administrators were conducted. The Purchaser’s Guide is publicly available online through the NBGH
(www.businessgrouphealth.org/prevention/purchasers*) and CDC Web sites (www.cdc.gov/business) and has received more than 260,000 hits since its release. In 2006, the University of Washington’s Health Promotion Research Center was funded to conduct a formal evaluation of the Purchaser’s Guide in the areas of employers’ purchasing decisions and coverage for preventive services.
Chapter 1, “The Role of Clinical Preventive Services in Disease Prevention and Early Detection,” provides the rationale for endorsing clinical preventive services and an overview of all seven chapters in the
(Table 1). Because many employers will not be able to cover all 46 clinical preventive services as benefits,
we present some ways to prioritize services, as recommended in Chapter 4,
“The Prioritization and Strategic Implementation of Clinical Preventive Service
Benefits.” Employers can use each of these methods
or a combination of them to determine which clinical preventive services would
be most helpful to their beneficiaries.
1) Determine which clinical preventive services have the greatest economic and health value. The top 20
“high-value” preventive services, rank-ordered according to their cost-effectiveness and ability to prevent disease, injury, or premature death, are shown in
Table 2 (5). Some high-value services, such as vision screening for adults older than 65
years, are not included in the Purchaser’s Guide because only a small proportion of covered employees fall into that
2) Address the workforce’s demographic characteristics and health conditions. Employers can evaluate whether their current clinical preventive benefits meet the needs of their beneficiary population. Employers with heterogeneous populations may decide to choose among the top 20 high-value preventive services. Employers with populations that are demographically homogeneous (e.g., mostly male or
mostly female, mostly young adults [aged 20 to 40 years], or mostly older adults [aged 50
to 70 years]) may decide to tailor their choice of clinical preventive services
benefits to their particular population. For a brief summary of clinical preventive services appropriate for different categories defined by age group and sex, employers can refer to the
charts in chapter 7,
“Resources and Tools.”
Box 1. Sample Scenario
Employer A has 4000 employees, 6000 dependents, and 1000 retirees. The employer provides coverage for all three groups, including Medicare Part B for retirees. The beneficiary population represents diverse racial/ethnic groups; 49% are female, and the average age is 38 years. After a review of the
health risk appraisal (HRA) information and medical claims data, several diseases and conditions emerge as major health or cost problems. Heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, and depression account for a high proportion of health care claims and a substantial percentage of absenteeism-related costs. The HRA data reveals that the prevalence
of hypertension and lipid disorders is high in this population. A recent employee survey reveals that employees would like more assistance to prevent and control these conditions, and they want opportunities at the work site to help them lose weight and quit smoking.
This employer can use this information to cut costs, choose benefits, and provide opportunities for health promotion at the work site.
3) Identify which clinical preventive services will address the risk profile of a population. Employers have a variety of ways to determine which conditions, diseases, and risk factors are the most prevalent or costly to the company. They can get this information
by conducting health risk appraisals, by reviewing data on medical or
disability claims, by conducting medical evaluations of employees, or by doing a combination of these and using other sources.
Employers can use these results to establish a group risk profile for their beneficiaries and then determine which services would be the most beneficial
to address specific risks. An example of one scenario for an employer is
described in the sample scenario in Box 1.
4) Review the evidence statements before choosing clinical preventive services to offer as benefits. Chapter 3 includes
evidence statements for each of the recommended clinical preventive services. In
the sample scenario, the employer wants to know more about the evidence for each recommended preventive service that will address those conditions and risk factors that are prevalent among its beneficiaries. Each evidence statement includes clinical recommendations made by USPSTF and other groups;
condition- and disease-specific information; and information about the strength of the evidence, the economic value of the preventive intervention, and how the intervention should be delivered.
On the basis of the evidence statements, employer A decides to implement high-value clinical preventive services and benefits that address the conditions identified in the
scenario. Employer A also decides to provide safe-harbor coverage for these preventive services in HSA-qualified plans and to eliminate co-pays for these preventive services in health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, and point-of-service plans. The employer also works with a business coalition
to establish low-cost interventions at the work site, such as tobacco-free policies; to provide access to low-cost, nutritious foods in the cafeteria and vending machines; and to place mileage markers on a walking course for employees.
5) Identify recommended SPD language and Current Procedural
Terminology (CPT) codes for the health plan contract. After reviewing the
evidence, employer A and its health benefits consultant decide to improve
coverage of selected health benefits. They review chapter 2 to identify the SPD
language statements for each of the recommended clinical preventive services they wish to include within their medical benefit plans. The employer
plans to implement benefits to help beneficiaries lead
healthy lifestyles to prevent and control the risk factors and conditions that lead to costly heart attacks and strokes. Employer A reviews the Purchaser’s Guide and the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology
guidelines (21,22) and decides to cover the following SPD recommendations, on the basis of data about its employees and the needs of its beneficiaries:
- Aspirin therapy
- Screening for depression
- Screening for diabetes
- Counseling on a healthy diet
- Screening, counseling, and treatment for lipid disorders
- Screening, counseling, and treatment for hypertension
- Screening for obesity
- Screening, counseling, and treatment for tobacco use
Box 2. Summary Plan Description Language: Hypertension
Covered screening includes conventional measurement with an arm cuff and an appropriately validated aneroid (containing no liquid) or digital sphygmomanometer (blood pressure meter).
Initiation, cessation, and interval of screening is a covered benefit for all children, adolescents, and adults and may be conducted as medically indicated.
Hypertension (Counseling and Treatment)
Covered treatment for hypertension includes
- Counseling to promote therapeutic lifestyle changes
- Office visits to monitor hypertension and treatment efforts
- Medications used to treat hypertension
Six counseling, treatment, and monitoring sessions are covered per calendar year. Additional counseling sessions are covered as medically indicated. Beneficiaries undergoing treatment with hypertension-lowering medications qualify for additional medication management visits, as medically indicated.
An example of the SPD for hypertension is presented in Box 2. CPT codes are provided in the Purchaser's Guide as an appendix to the SPD language statements to ensure that clinical preventive services are implemented and reimbursed. The American Medical Association developed the CPT codes, which are updated annually,
to provide a uniform language that describes medical, surgical, and diagnostic services provided by clinicians. Employers who
adopt the SPD recommendations in the Purchaser’s Guide should ensure that administrators of their health plan approve the listed CPT codes for reimbursement of providers.
6) Determine whether to change or remove coverage for services with limited or conflicting evidence
of effectiveness or with potential adverse effects. Some preventive services are very effective; others are ineffective, lack proof of effectiveness, or may be harmful. In
chapter 5, the Purchaser’s Guide summarizes the USPSTF ratings of clinical preventive services that were not included as recommendations using the
- I (insufficient evidence to recommend for or against)
- C (no recommendation either for or against)
- D (recommend against)
Employers should evaluate their current benefits and consider removing benefits for services that are ineffective, lack sufficient evidence,
or are harmful.
7) Look for opportunities to promote the delivery and use of preventive services. Providing coverage for clinical preventive services is an essential step to improving overall employee health. Although coverage is necessary to promote the delivery and use of such services, coverage alone is not sufficient to optimize the health of employees. Employers need to
ensure that health plan
administrators, providers, and beneficiaries know that these benefits exist and should be used. Chapter 6,
“Leveraging Benefits,” identifies numerous ways that employers can promote the delivery and use of preventive services to influence healthy behavior,
such as the following:
- Educate beneficiaries about the importance of clinical preventive services in adopting healthy lifestyles.
- Encourage beneficiaries to use covered preventive services appropriately.
- Support communitywide activities in disease prevention and health promotion.
Box 3. Employer Success Story: Fieldale Farms
Fieldale Farms, a poultry processor in Georgia, offered mobile screening, a gift card, and other incentives to all employees participating in its
wellness program. Those with elevated blood pressure and high cholesterol were offered follow-up nutrition counseling on-site as a covered service and
received company-paid fitness memberships. Over a 5-year period, 26% of the participating employees with high blood pressure and high
cholesterol normalized these conditions through diet changes, medications, and physical activity. For 2004, the overall health care cost for an employee participating in the Fieldale Farms Wellness Program averaged $3052, less than half the national average health care cost for a manufacturing employee ($6900) (23).
State and local health departments and other organizations can assist employers in establishing connections with community-based resources to enhance use of preventive services. Chapter 6 also includes information about the CDC Community Guide, which directs
health care purchasers to evidence-based recommendations for population health that may enhance their investment in clinical preventive services.
The Community Guide also gives employers examples of activities to
improve the delivery and use of preventive services, such as using client
reminders, incentives, media, and feedback to providers. This guide is available at www.thecommunityguide.org.*
This chapter also gives examples of employers’ successes (Box 3).
8) Establish and evaluate goals for the health of beneficiaries. Employers should consider establishing goals and benchmarks to evaluate whether
employees’ health has improved over time. Chapter 7, “Resources and
Tools,” provides life-course charts that provide a visual guide to clinical preventive services across the life span. The chapter also
charts and compares the recommendations proposed in the Purchaser’s Guide
with the 2007 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and
Information Set (HEDIS), the National Committee for Quality Assurance's 2007 State of Health Care Quality Report, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’
Healthy People 2010: With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health
(HP 2010). In the sample scenario, for example, employer A can decide to use any of the goals listed in HP 2010 or the 2007 HEDIS measures as benchmarks for its beneficiaries. For example, the HP
2010 target is to reduce the proportion of adults aged 20 years or older with hypertension to 16% and to increase to
50% the proportion of adults aged 18 years or older who have their high blood pressure under control. Employer A could track progress toward these goals.
Back to top
A Purchaser’s Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Moving Science into Coverage is an important tool for employers. The
Purchaser’s Guide translates clinical guidelines and medical evidence into lay terms, providing employers with the information they need to select, define, and implement 46 preventive medical benefits. Employers and health benefits consultants can use the
Purchaser’s Guide to develop a benefits package that includes preventive services
proven to be effective in preventing illness and premature death.
The Purchaser’s Guide has some limitations. Although the clinical recommendations are based on strong evidence, information pertaining to the economic benefits was lacking for some recommendations. Even so, each chapter represents the best available evidence in the published literature. Second, although the
Purchaser’s Guide includes advice for improving coverage, it does not comprehensively address the policy, educational, and system interventions necessary to ensure that clinicians
deliver the preventive services and that patients can access them. Third, the comprehensiveness of the recommendations could be overwhelming to employers in a resource-constrained environment. On the other hand, the
Purchaser’s Guide provides different scenarios to help employers prioritize and select the services that
may be most useful to their beneficiaries.
Clinical preventive services can reduce health care costs by preventing disease, injury, and disability and by identifying health problems early, when treatment is most effective and least expensive. Employers play a powerful role in shaping health care for many people in the United States. They decide what preventive health care services to cover in an employee’s health plan and whether to establish work site programs and policies in health promotion that support healthy
The Purchaser’s Guide promotes the application of consistent standards for quality care,
which will provide beneficiaries better value in their health plan. Perhaps most importantly, the
Purchaser’s Guide provides succinct guidance to help employers develop an overall strategy to phase in effective preventive benefits and to customize preventive programs for their employees. NBGH
reports that many Fortune 500
companies will be using the Purchaser’s Guide when negotiating their health benefit contracts and developing their health care strategies, which could
improve the health of millions of employees and their dependents.
In an era of limited resources and increased need for accountability to improve health outcomes, the Purchaser’s Guide
helps employers design value-based quality health plans. As employers address rising health
care costs and the growing burden of chronic disease in the United States, the
Purchaser’s Guide will be a useful tool for developing and evaluating health benefits plans,
and will allow employers to improve the preventive
health services they offer.
Back to top
We thank Richard E. Dixon, MD, FACP, Distinguished Consultant, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for his helpful comments and suggestions.
Back to top
Corresponding Author: Dyann Matson Koffman, DrPH, MPH, CHES, Public Health Educator/Scientist, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention,
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention,4770 Buford Hwy NE, Mailstop K-47, Atlanta, GA 30341. Telephone: 770-488-8002. E-mail: email@example.com.
Author Affiliations: Andrew Lanza, McKing Consulting Corporation and
Business Sector Partnerships and Strategic Alliances, the National Center for
Health Marketing, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Kathryn Phillips Campbell, National Business Group on Health, Center for Prevention and Health Services, Washington, District
Back to top
- Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL.
Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000.
[Published erratum in: JAMA 2005;293(3)293-4]. JAMA 2004;291(10):1238-45.
- National health expenditures and selected economic indicators. Levels and average annual percent change: selected calendar years 1990-2013. Washington (DC): Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of the Actuary; 2004.
- The future of the public’s health in the 21st century. Washington (DC):
Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; 2002.
- McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al.
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;348(26):2635-45.
- Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI.
Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med 2006;31(1):52-61.
- Why invest in disease prevention? Results from the Partnership for Prevention/William M. Mercer 1997 Survey of Employee-sponsored Health Plans. Washington (DC): Partnership for Prevention; 1999.
- Bondi MA, Harris JR, Atkins D, French ME, Umland B.
Employer coverage of clinical preventive services in the United States. Am J Health Promot 2006;20(3):214-22.
- Garber AM.
Evidence-based coverage policy. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(5):62-82.
- Faulkner LA, Schauffler HH.
The effect of health insurance coverage on the appropriate use of recommended clinical preventive services. Am J Prev
- Chattopadhyay SK, Hall HI, Wolf RB, Custer WS.
Sources of health insurance in the U.S.: analysis of state-level data and implications for public health programs. J Public Health Manag Pract 1999;5(3):35-46.
- Ford ES, Will JC, De Proost Ford MA, Mokdad AH.
Health insurance status and cardiovascular disease risk factors among 50-64-year-old U.S. women: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Womens Health 1998;7(8):997-1006.
- Collins SR, Davis K, Doty MM, Ho A.
Wages, health benefits, and workers’ health. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund) 2004;788:1-16.
- Wynia MK, VanGeest J, Cummins DS, Wilson IB.
Do physicians not offer useful services because of coverage restrictions? Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22(4):190-7.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Health insurance coverage and receipt of preventive health services — United States, 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44(11):219-25.
- Lurie N, Manning WG, Peterson C, Goldberg GA, Phelps CA, Lillard L.
Preventive care: do we practice what we preach? Am J Public Health 1987;77(7):801-4.
- Guide to clinical preventive services: an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions: report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1989.
- Carrasquillo O, Lantigua RA, Shea S.
Preventive services among Medicare beneficiaries with supplemental coverage versus HMO enrollees, Medicaid recipients, and elders with no additional coverage. Med Care 2001;39(6):616-26.
- Stoil MJ, Hill GA.
Critical mandates: prevention and health promotion. Behav Healthc Tomorrow 1998;7(4):19-23.
- Campbell KP, Lanza A, Dixon R, Chattopadhyay S, Molinari N, Finch RA, eds. A purchaser’s guide to clinical preventive services: moving science into coverage. Washington (DC): National Business Group on Health; 2006. http://www.businessgrouphealth.org/prevention/ purchasers/index.cfm.* Accessed November 13, 2007.
- The guide to clinical preventive services: recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm#Recommendations. Accessed November 13, 2007.
- Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, Eckel RH, Fair JM, Fortmann SP, et al.
AHA guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: 2002 update: consensus panel guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patients without coronary or other atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Circulation 2002;106(3):388–91.
- Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Fonarow GC, et al.
AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Circulation 2006;113(19):2363–72.
- Shirreffs A. Fieldale farms shows wellness programs pay. Indepth: Georgia 200 market report and insurance and employee benefits. Atlanta Business Chronicle, April 8, 2005.
Back to top