ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Church-Based Breast Cancer Screening Education: Impact of Two Approaches on Latinas Enrolled in Public and Private Health Insurance Plans

	Promotora Intervention		Printed Intervention
	Baseline	Follow-up	Baseline	Follow-up
Overall	58.96	60.85	58.07	58.48
Medicaid FFS^a	37.40	43.70	43.16	49.29
Medicare FFS^a	36.96	42.86	43.57	49.25
HMO-group	54.64	58.77	57.17	48.92
HMO-staff	73.02	71.76	78.09	73.28

Figure. Mammogram rates of Latinas exposed to the Printed Intervention or the Promotora Intervention during baseline (1998–1999) and follow-up (2000–2001), by insurance plan, Tepeyac Project, Colorado, 1999–2005.

Return to article

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.

Home

This page last reviewed October 25, 2011

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

United States Department of
Health and Human Services

ORIGINAL RESEARCH Church-Based Breast Cancer Screening Education: Impact of Two Approaches on Latinas Enrolled in Public and Private Health Insurance Plans

ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Church-Based Breast Cancer Screening Education: Impact of Two Approaches on Latinas Enrolled in Public and Private Health Insurance Plans