Volume 4: No. 3, July 2007
Obesity on Campus
Phillip B. Sparling, EdD
Suggested citation for this article: Sparling PB. Obesity on campus. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2007 Jul [date cited]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2007/
The “O” word on campus is not Oprah or online; it is obesity. During the past few years, administrators and faculty members have been discussing obesity as they see
greater numbers of overweight students. News media accounts about rising rates of obesity provide an impersonal perspective of the problem, but
observing obesity face-to-face in our classrooms and across our campuses
makes it real. Increasing numbers of “super-sized” students are right in front of our eyes. They should not be ignored.
Epidemiologists paint a gloomy picture of the health of our young people.
During the past two decades, a significant increase in obesity and
obesity-related disorders such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia
has occurred among people in their teens and 20s (1,2). Those of us who are middle-aged have difficulty accepting chronic disease in our
own lives; seeing it prematurely affect the younger generation
is even more distressing.
Little progress has been made in controlling or preventing obesity, because the cards are stacked against us. Obesity is a complex adaptation to existing environments that greatly favor high energy intake and low energy expenditure (3). Food is everywhere, and it is generally inexpensive, flavorful, large-portioned, and high-calorie. In addition, we rely on energy-saving devices and technology
throughout the day, and most of our waking hours are spent sitting.
No medical breakthrough is on the horizon. Even with continued advances in genomics and molecular medicine, scientists are unlikely to discover an effective, safe, and affordable drug that would cure or prevent obesity. From a public health perspective, the best solution remains encouraging positive behavior changes associated with diet and physical activity. However, although obesity is
generally acknowledged as a serious problem and difficult to solve, many college and university leaders
view helping overweight students as being outside the purview of higher education.
Back to top
Recognizing the Need for Action
Concern about student behaviors related to alcohol, drugs, and sexuality overshadows the need to emphasize the mundane but important habits of eating healthfully and exercising
regularly. Campus student services have long been established to manage the perennial coming-of-age issues associated with substance abuse and sexual behavior. These programs are
continually updated to guide students toward responsible decision making and to minimize crises. Let the good work continue. However, excess body weight has emerged as a new challenge. The data are convincing.
Findings from a national survey conducted in 2005 indicate that 3 of 10 college students are either overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25.0–29.9 kg/m2) or obese (BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2) (4). Behaviorally, 9 of 10 students eat fewer than five servings of fruits and vegetables per day, and nearly 6 of 10 students
participate fewer than 3 days per week in vigorous-intensity (20 minutes or
more) or moderate-intensity (30 minutes or more) physical activity (4). Although excess weight, poor nutrition, and insufficient physical activity are not emergencies that require immediate action, their urgency should not be underestimated.
The predominant way obesity is thought about and confronted — particularly at research universities — is far removed from the current needs of overweight students.
The emphasis is on scientific inquiry; researchers focus on unraveling the biological complexities of obesity and related medical conditions.
Although universities assemble top-notch biomedical teams to conduct basic research, the institutions often ignore the problem of obesity on their own campuses. This type of disconnect is not new to academia, and the explanation is straightforward. Universities are increasingly dependent on external dollars to remain solvent, and eminent research teams bring in major funding from federal agencies
and biotechnical companies.
Simply put, a significant gap persists between the quest for new clues to solve the obesity puzzle (basic biomedical research) and the
application of current evidence-based practices to prevent and treat obesity now (applied behavioral research). The good news is that funding is becoming available to study how to improve the translation process at all levels. By better understanding the
barriers to transfer and by focusing on context and connectedness, we can find ways to accelerate the translation of evidence-based recommendations into practice and policy (5).
Another problem is that obesity is an emotionally charged issue surrounded by prejudices and misconceptions.
We are prone to judge obesity as a personal failing or a sign of insufficient
will power — perceptions that are almost always incorrect. People don’t choose to be obese.
Many paths lead to obesity, and each is shaped by a unique
combination of intertwined biological, psychosocial, environmental, and cultural influences. Moreover, although the term
obesity has a specific meaning to researchers, clinicians, and educators, it is thought to be pejorative by many students, patients, and the public. We must be sensitive to this belief and, depending on the target audience, take the time to more clearly define the term or use
alternative language such as overweight or excess weight.
The awkwardness of discussing obesity should not deter us from addressing the
problem. Colleges and universities have long dealt with complex, controversial issues. Enlightenment is our business: we should be educating all
of our students — obese or not — about issues related to diet, exercise, and behavioral change. We should openly discuss the stigma of obesity and how we can
combat it. Resources to help students reach and maintain a healthy weight can be
provided in a sensitive, nonjudgmental, and professional manner. Many students would be grateful for such services.
Back to top
Meeting the Challenge
We have a special opportunity to tackle the problem of obesity on our campuses. For many young people, college is the first major step toward independence and charting their own courses. Students are open to change and challenge as they reexamine their lifestyle choices. We can capitalize on this ripe-to-change period
by encouraging students to improve eating and exercise
habits and teaching them how to implement healthful changes. At the same time, we have the
capacity to provide a supportive environment by providing and promoting good food choices and multiple options for physical activity, including pedestrian-friendly campuses.
The goals are to decrease the prevalence of obesity through healthy weight
loss and maintenance of weight loss among the overweight and to prevent excess
weight gain among the nonoverweight. To date, weight management efforts on
college campuses have been fragmented. Just as the causes of obesity are
multifactorial, solutions must be both broad in scope and coordinated. A long-term plan to deal with student obesity can build on existing programs and need not be expensive. However, administrators must support and even champion the cause. Logical steps include establishing a campuswide team that represents key campus units, such as the president’s office, campus planning, campus recreation, the counseling center, food services, student health, student
government, and selected academic departments; taking stock of current resources and policies; coordinating efforts and developing realistic goals and strategies for reaching them; and following through
by implementing a healthy weight initiative, monitoring progress, and adjusting accordingly.
Examples of programs include instituting an across-the-curriculum course on healthy weight with information on nutrition, physical activity, energy balance, and self-management skills; hosting a semiannual speaking engagement with a prominent health or medical authority; reviving or expanding physical education and fitness classes to expose students to a variety of enjoyable, potentially
lifelong activities (6); developing and promoting walking and cycling routes on campus (7); and renegotiating contracts with campus food vendors for healthier fare.
When well-known U.S.-based companies, including Wendy’s International, Inc and
the KFC Corporation, as well as New York City, are eliminating trans fats from their restaurants’ menus,
surely colleges can be bolder and hold vendors to higher standards for healthier foods (8).
Student health centers should offer weight management services to overweight students. University obesity clinics do not meet this need,
because most are based only in medical schools and either offer fee-based programs open to the community or are research-focused
and have participant selection
criteria. To promote a campuswide healthy weight initiative, popular professors, coaches, students, and local luminaries could be recruited as spokespeople.
More than ever, consensus exists among professionals (e.g., scientific and medical organizations, public health agencies) on the key lifestyle recommendations related to physical activity, diet, and healthy weight (9-13). Evidence for the synergistic benefits of regular exercise and good nutrition in both primary and secondary prevention across multiple chronic diseases is
unambiguous and continues to grow. Our health messages to Americans have never been clearer or stronger.
Colleges will evolve different strategies that make sense for their students and campuses. The eventual aim is to establish a unified campuswide team that can efficiently coordinate and creatively promote classroom, health care, and extracurricular programs that target obesity. Solutions should be sustainable and manifest in food services, in building and campus design, and through policy (14,15). Campuswide approaches are more likely to succeed, because competing interests and barriers can be identified early. Programs that require changes in curricula, policies, campus
environments, or business operations hold the greatest promise for making a difference but also pose the greatest challenge. Strategic thinking and political aplomb are important ingredients for success. A necessary precondition, however, is institutional commitment.
Back to top
Action Needed Sooner Not Later
Remember that the mission of higher education is to develop the total person. Check your college catalog: along with the term
well-educated, terms such as ethical, civic-minded, industrious, and healthy are used to describe the ideal graduate. Although these attributes correlate with high standards, helping students achieve them commits us to goals that many of us still hold dear and
strive to reach in our various university roles. In that spirit, colleges should be sensitive to the broader needs of
their students and should respond appropriately as those needs change.
We must recognize that obesity is a real threat that compromises the overall well-being and development of our students. Much is at stake —
these young people are not just our future alumni but America’s next generation of leaders. Colleges need to step forward, develop an action plan, and follow through. Coordinated campuswide strategies that focus on healthy eating, regular physical activity, and
effective weight management can benefit all members of the campus community. The vision is to make healthy decisions easier, more convenient, and enjoyable through supportive environmental changes and forward-thinking policies.
Academics value the world of ideas, believe in social causes, and relish the opportunity to solve real-world problems. Obesity is a problem whose deleterious effects are occurring not just in our world but on our campuses. We do have a vested interest. And who is better positioned and more able to look for its solutions than we are? Let’s rally the forces to meet this challenge now.
Back to top
Corresponding Author: Phillip B. Sparling, EdD, Professor of Applied Physiology,
School of Applied Physiology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 281 Ferst Dr, Atlanta, GA 30332-0356. Telephone: 404-894-3402. E-mail: email@example.com.
Back to top
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s
call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity; 2001.
Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2001. Available from: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity
- Overweight and obesity [Internet].
Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;[cited
2006 Oct 16]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity
- Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Reed GW, Peters JC.
Obesity and the environment: where do we go from here? Science 2003;299(5608):853-5.
- American College Health Association.
American College Health Association National College Health Assessment
(ACHA-NCHA): Spring 2005 reference group data report (Abridged). J Am
Coll Health 2006;55(1):5-16.
- Glasgow RE, Emmons KM.
How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu
Rev Public Health 2007;28:413-33.
- Sparling PB.
College physical education: an unrecognized agent of change in combating inactivity-related diseases. Perspect Biol Med 2003;46(4):579-87.
- Resources/programs [Internet]. Chapel Hill (NC): Pedestrian and Bicycle
2006 Oct 16].
Available from: http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/programs.htm *
- 2007 to bring sharp reductions
in artificial trans fat: restaurants respond to laws, litigation, & consumer
demand [Press release]. Washington (DC): Center for Science in the Public
Interest;2006 Dec 29. Available from: http://www.cspinet.org/new/200612291.html *
- Information [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): The Obesity Society;[cited
2006 Oct 16]. Available from: http://www.naaso.org/information *
- Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005.
Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S.
Department of Agriculture;[cited
2006 Oct 16]. Available from: http://www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines
- Guide to Community Preventive
Services. Obesity. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;[cited
2006 Oct 16]. Available from:
- Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, Carnethon M, Daniels S, Franch HA, et al.
Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement
from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. [Published
erratum in: Circulation 2006;114(23):e629, Circulation 2006;114(1):e27]. Circulation 2006;114(1):82–96.
- Kushi LH, Byers T, Doyle C, Bandera EV, McCullough M, McTiernan A, et al.
American Cancer Society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention: reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity.
[Published erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(1):66]. CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56(5):254–81.
- Foxhall K.
Beginning to begin: reports from the battle on obesity. Am J Public Health 2006;96(12):2106-12.
- Internet resources [Internet]. New Haven (CT): Rudd Center for Food Policy
and Obesity at Yale University;[cited 2006 Oct 16]. Available
from: http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/default.aspx?id=17#opr *
Back to top
*URLs for nonfederal organizations are provided solely as a
service to our users. URLs do not constitute an endorsement of any organization
by CDC or the federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC is
not responsible for the content of Web pages found at these URLs.