Skip Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z

Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy

View Current Issue
Issue Archive
Archivo de números en español








Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
MMWR


 Home 

Volume 2: Special Issue, November 2005

FROM THE EDITOR IN CHIEF
Health Education From 1775 to 2005


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Print this article Print this article
E-mail this article E-mail this article:



Send feedback to editors Send feedback to editors
Download this article as a PDF Download this article as a PDF (123K)

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files.


Navigate This Article
References


Lynne S. Wilcox, MD, MPH

Suggested citation for this article: Wilcox LS. Health education from 1775 to 2005. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov [date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/
nov/05_0134.htm
.

Health education is an innate aspect of public health practice and difficult to discuss as a separate entity. Nevertheless, this special issue of Preventing Chronic Disease provides in-depth examinations of the purposes and uses of health education programs. We thank Neil Hann of the Oklahoma State Department of Health and Carol Russell of the Directors of Health Promotion and Education for serving as guest editors for this issue.

Among the earliest recorded health education programs in the United States were those related to military troops of the 18th century during the Revolutionary War. These programs are distinguished by their recognition of a “community,” determined as much by membership in a common group as by geopolitical boundaries. Soldiers were more likely to die of infectious diseases than of battle wounds; camp hygiene was thus a critical aspect of an officer’s duties. One of George Washington’s first general orders, dated July 4, 1775, states, “All officers are required and expected to pay diligent Attention to keep their Men neat and clean . . . and inculcate upon them the necessity of cleanliness. . . . They are also to take care that Necessarys [latrines] be provided in the camps” (1).

Several programs discussed in this issue highlight health education in communities. A report from Texas describes the certification of promotores to serve as community health educators in neighborhoods (2). Oregon has developed a partnership between state public health and Medicaid agencies to encourage its community of health care providers to address the impact of tobacco on asthma morbidity (3). Colorado conducted an assessment of the costs and savings of community fluoridation programs within the state, providing useful information to policymakers on the importance of water fluoridation (4). North Carolina provided microgrants to empower local communities to select and implement their own health promotion projects (5), and in another program, encouraged local health departments to use policy-change and environmental-change strategies to address community risk factors (6).

One of the most remarkable reports on public health in the 19th century was the Report of the Sanitary Commission of Massachusetts 1850, also called the Shattuck Report after the chairman of the commission, Lemuel Shattuck (7). This document is considered the first scientific report in the United States describing the health of a population using birth and death rates, comparisons with the rates of other communities, and additional data to support its comprehensive recommendations on protecting the health of Massachusetts citizens.

One of the recommendations of the Shattuck Report addressed school health education: “Every thing connected with wealth, happiness and long life depends upon health. . . . This matter has been too little regarded in the education of the young. Intellectual culture has received too much and physical training too little attention. . . . By adopting [the recommendation], many and many a life would annually be saved in this Commonwealth, and the general health of the rising generation would be greatly improved” (7).

The health of school-aged and preschool-aged children receives noteworthy attention in this issue. Rhode Island surveyed school principals to assess current health promotion programs and then investigated the use of the School Health Index to improve school programs (8). Wisconsin established a resource guide for schools and families who care for children with diabetes (9). And Maine assessed the challenges of changing food options in school vending machines and cafeterias to improve student nutrition habits (10).

The Shattuck Report also recommended that “open spaces be reserved, in cities and villages, for public walks; that wide streets be laid out; and that both be ornamented with trees.” The primary reason for this recommendation was to purify the air, but the report stated, “Open spaces also would afford to the artizan and the poorer classes the advantages of fresh air and exercise, in their occasional hours of leisure” (7).

In this issue, West Virginia describes a physical activity promotion project that encouraged schools, students, and communities to conduct small research programs in physical activity (11). Many of these emphasized walking routes and trails, providing the “fresh air and exercise” mentioned in the Shattuck Report.

Early in the 20th century, the Children’s Bureau, a unit within the federal Labor Department, embarked on a massive media campaign, distributing 3 million pamphlets on infant care between 1914 and 1925 and responding to up to 125,000 letters each year from mothers (12). These communications extended to women of all races, classes, and regions, particularly poor rural women. One mother’s letter noted, “Naturally I am much interested in the things being done for children. . . . In the course of a few years the Babies of today will be directing affairs.”

Media campaigns continue to be an important aspect of health education. Oregon analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to identify whether at-risk Oregonians knew they were at high risk for developing diabetes (13). Knowledge gained from this survey will pave the way toward designing effective public health messages. Arkansas examined the effects of a radio campaign designed to increase physical activity among children aged 9 to 13 years (14).

In the 21st century, we continue to face similar challenges on health education, but we have new tools. Alabama describes an innovative approach to analyzing cancer data, which uses geocoding, a recently developed information tool, to identify unique population segments (15). In a collaborative partnership with state, federal, and private-sector members, the state linked information from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the U.S. census, health care use data, and marketing analyses of U.S. lifestyle segmentation clusters. The state cancer division added geocoding to 7 years of information from its cancer registry and used techniques developed by the National Cancer Institute’s cluster-based Consumer Health Profiles. All these data will be used to identify Alabama's high-risk, underserved communities, develop and implement cancer programs designed for those communities, and assess the usefulness of such clustering approaches in cancer prevention and control among Alabama citizens.

Such a plethora of technical opportunities to collect and combine data was not available a decade ago. The multiple, unique programs presented in this issue illustrate the progress of U.S. health education over the past 230 years. While we have not yet achieved the goal of healthy lives for all, we have good reason to expect additional success in the future.

Back to top

References

  1. Bayne-Jones S. The evolution of preventive medicine in the United States army, 1607-1939 [Internet]. Washington (DC): Office of the Surgeon General, Office of Medical History; 1968 [cited 2005 May 13]. Available from: URL: http://history.amedd.army.mil/booksdocs/misc/ evprev/frameindex.html*.
  2. Nichols DC, Berrios C, Samar H. Texas’ community health workforce: from state health promotion policy to community-level practice. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  3. Rebanal RD, Leman R. Collaboration between Oregon’s chronic disease programs and Medicaid to decrease smoking among Medicaid-insured Oregonians with asthma. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  4. O’Connell JM, Brunson D, Anselmo T, Sullivan PW. Costs and savings associated with community water fluoridation programs in Colorado. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  5. Bobbitt-Cooke M. Energizing community health improvement: the promise of microgrants. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  6. Plescia M, Young S, Ritzman RL. Statewide community-based health promotion: a North Carolina model to build local capacity for chronic disease prevention. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  7. Shattuck L. Report of a general plan for the promotion of general and public health devised, prepared and recommended by the commissioners appointed under a resolve of the legislature of Massachusetts, relating to a sanitary survey of the state, 1850. Baton Rouge (LA): Louisiana State University, The Medical and Public Health Law Site [cited 2005 May 9]. Available from: URL: http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cphl/history/books/sr/*.
  8. Pearlman DN, Dowling E, Bayuk C, Cullinen K, Thacher AK. From concept to practice: using the School Health Index to create healthy school environments in Rhode Island elementary schools. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  9. Nimsgern A, Camponeschi J. Implementing a new diabetes resource for Wisconsin schools and families. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  10. Davee A-M, Whatley Blum JE, Devore RL, Beaudoin CM, Kaley LA, Leiter JL, et al. The Vending and à la Carte Policy Intervention in Maine public high schools. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  11. Tompkins NO, Rye JA, Zizzi S, Vitullo E. Engaging rural youth in physical activity promotion research in an after-school setting. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  12. Ladd-Taylor M. Raising a baby the government way: mothers’ letters to the Children’s Bureau, 1915-1932. New Bruswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press;1986.
  13. Kemple AM, Zlot AI, Leman RF. Perceived likelihood of developing diabetes among high-risk Oregonians. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  14. Balamurugan A, Oakleaf EJ, Rath D. Using paid radio advertisements to promote physical activity among Arkansas tweens. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.
  15. Miner JW, White A, Lubenow AE, Palmer S. Geocoding and social marketing in Alabama’s cancer prevention programs. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Nov.

Back to top

*URLs for nonfederal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. URLs do not constitute an endorsement of any organization by CDC or the federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC is not responsible for the content of Web pages found at these URLs.

 



 



The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.


 Home 

Privacy Policy | Accessibility

CDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last reviewed March 22, 2013

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
 HHS logoUnited States Department of
Health and Human Services