Skip Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z

Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy

View Current Issue
Issue Archive
Archivo de números en español








Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
MMWR


 Home 

Volume 1: No. 3, July 2004

BOOK REVIEW
How Healthy Are We? A National Study of Well-Being at Midlife


TABLE OF CONTENTS


Print this article Print this article
E-mail this article E-mail this article:



Send feedback to editors Send feedback to editors
Download this article as a PDF Download this article as a PDF (109K)

You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view PDF files.

Editors: Orville G. Brim, Carol D. Ryff, Ronald C. Kessler
Chicago
The University of Chicago Press
Publication Date: 2004
688 pages, 74 figures, 104 tables
Price: $42.00
ISBN (cloth): 0-226-07475-7

Suggested citation for this article: Sutphen SK. How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife [book review]. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2004 Jul [date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/
jul/04_0040.htm
.

Every human being is the author of his own health or disease.

— Siddhartha Gautama, The Buddha, 563–483 BC

Many Americans might agree with this statement, but if asked to rate their own physical, mental, and health beliefs, what would their responses be? How would they respond at midlife? How Healthy Are We? A National Study of Well-Being at Midlife answers these questions.

In 1990, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation established the Research Network on Successful Midlife Development (MIDMAC), directed by one of the book’s editors, Orville Brim. The multidisciplinary network was tasked with examining adults aged 40 to 60 as part of the foundation’s series of studies on midlife development. MIDMAC identified the following goals:

  • Establish specific indicators for a successful midlife.
  • Establish a factual basis for the course of midlife.
  • Identify factors that may influence the course of midlife development.
  • Identify strategies that individuals may use to deal with midlife challenges.

MIDMAC developed a national survey known as MIDUS (Midlife Development in the United States) (available at http://midmac.med.harvard.edu/research.html*) to help meet these goals. In How Healthy Are We?, Brim and colleagues present a collection of articles that summarize MIDUS survey findings.

The authors organize the text into four sections. Chapter 1 provides background on MIDMAC and the development of the MIDUS survey, including information on samples, design, measures, and content. Chapters 2 through 6 discuss assessments of physical health and the impact of age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Chapters 7 through 14 explore assessments of psychological well-being and quality of life. Chapters 15 through 21 focus on contexts that affect midlife experiences, including work, family, and geography. Each chapter provides background research, information on how MIDUS was designed and implemented, results, and a comparison between MIDUS and prior studies.

The audience for this text includes a broad range of scientists, such as sociologists, epidemiologists, mental health practitioners, psychologists, and anthropologists, reflecting the range of disciplines involved in developing the survey. In addition, the audience includes physicians, public health practitioners, and policy makers.

Of particular interest from a policy perspective is Chapter 17, which centers on work, family, and social class. The authors find that the lower the income level, the more likely it is that work is juxtaposed with poor social support, a chronically ill child, or other caretaking responsibility. Low-income jobs do not provide flexibility in sick leave or work hours, resulting in a disproportionate number of children who suffer from unmet health and developmental needs — and ultimately impacting our nation’s health.

Chapter 6, a discussion of menopause and the aging process, is another well-written and accessible chapter. The author finds that, for most women, menopause is a benign event unassociated with the severe physical and psychological distress traditionally portrayed.

Other interesting findings in the book include the following:

  • Women report worse health than men, but they devote more effort to health maintenance and have greater longevity.
  • The social/income gradient to ill health is greater in men than women and is independent of education.
  • Adults rate the development of relationships with others as the most important factor in having a good life, followed by health, then family.
  • While daily stresses or demands are greater in the lives of young and midlife adults compared to individuals in other life stages, midlife adults feel they have a greater level of mastery and control over stresses and demands than young adults do.

Overall, How Healthy Are We? answers the title question through research establishing midlife as a time when most adults have a positive view of physical health, have established supportive family relationships, are pleased with their financial situation, have a good quality of life, and have control and mastery of their work. Education, socioeconomic standing, race, and gender affect all of the above.

How Healthy Are We? also can serve as a basis for brainstorming community-based approaches for tackling chronic health issues and for devising new methods to encourage behavioral change. For example, an awareness of gender differences in health-maintenance behavior, noted in Chapter 1, could change approaches to promoting weight loss or smoking cessation for men and women.

Because the MIDUS survey included individuals aged 25–74, a more complete picture emerges on midlife in relation to the other life stages. How Healthy Are We? differs from other texts on midlife by presenting this expanded perspective. Some texts define midlife from a traditional psychological or biological perspective using staging or physical changes. Others take a health-management approach, focusing on specific aspects of midlife such as parenting or sexuality, or examining midlife in the context of larger societal trends such as divorce, two-income families, and longer life expectancy.

MIDMAC and MIDUS serve as excellent blueprints for an integrative approach to investigation. The book describes carefully developed pilot studies and creatively used satellite studies that provide information on a national level as well as on specific target groups. The public health profession could apply this approach to a wide range of problems.

The authors provide great insight into the physical, psychological, and social development that takes place during this important stage of life and establish a clear baseline for further exploration of midlife issues.

Sussan K. Sutphen, MD
Choice Care Occupational Medicine
Atlanta, Ga

*URLs for nonfederal organizations are provided solely as a service to our users. URLs do not constitute an endorsement of any organization by CDC or the federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC is not responsible for the content of Web pages found at these URLs.

Back to top

 



 



The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.


 Home 

Privacy Policy | Accessibility

CDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last reviewed March 22, 2013
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
 HHS logoUnited States Department of
Health and Human Services