Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to site content
CDC Home

Mammography Use -- Wisconsin, 1980-1993

In the United States, efforts to reduce mortality from breast cancer focus primarily on secondary prevention (i.e., early detection and treatment). Since 1980, private, public, and voluntary organizations in Wisconsin have promoted screening mammography as a means for reducing the death rate from breast cancer (1,2). To assess the effectiveness of these efforts, the Division of Health, Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services (DOH), analyzed data from annual statewide surveys of mammography providers during 1989-1993 and data about self-reported mammography use from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) during 1987-1993. This report summarizes these analyses and trends in the number of mammograms performed annually in Wisconsin during 1980-1993.

An annual survey of all registered mammography providers in Wisconsin has been conducted since 1989. During 1980-1993, the number of mammography providers ranged from 76 to 236 Table_1. Survey questionnaires are mailed annually to all mammography providers in conjunction with a mailing of DOH radiation-protection registration materials. The questionnaire asks each facility to estimate the total number of mammograms performed during that year and to provide information about mammography referral and follow-up procedures, fees, and availability of low-cost screening services. The 1989 survey requested estimates of the total number of mammograms performed during 1980-1989. The response rates for the five surveys conducted during 1989-1993 were 75%, 89%, 90%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. Data were adjusted for nonresponse to provide statewide estimates of the annual number of mammograms performed.

Trends in self-reported mammography use were determined by analyzing data from the BRFSS, which has included questions about mammography use since 1987. The BRFSS is a random-digit-dialed telephone survey of household residents aged greater than or equal to 18 years that provides population-based surveillance data about selected health behaviors. The total number of mammograms performed in the state each year during 1987-1993 was estimated from the BRFSS by multiplying the adult female population in Wisconsin by the proportion of women who reported having had a mammogram during the preceding 12 months. The number of adult women interviewed in Wisconsin for the annual BRFSS ranged from 673 (in 1990) to 857 (in 1993).

Analyses of the mammography provider surveys (1989-1993) and the BRFSS (1987-1993) indicated steady increases in the number of mammograms performed each year during 1980-1993 Table_1. Based on the provider survey, the total number of mammograms performed each year increased nearly 17-fold, from 31,000 in 1980 to 517,000 in 1993. Compared with the provider survey, estimates based on the BRFSS were consistently higher, varying from 81% higher in 1988 to 17% higher in 1993. In addition, the number of mammography providers increased 310%, from 76 in 1980 to 236 in 1993. Standard errors for annual BRFSS estimates ranged from plus or minus 1.5% to plus or minus 1.7%.

Reported by: P Lantz, PhD, M Bunge, E Cautley, JL Phillips, PL Remington MD, State Chronic Disease Epidemiologist, Div of Health, Wisconsin Dept of Health and Social Svcs. Div of Field Epidemiology, Epidemiology Program Office, CDC.

Editorial Note

Editorial Note: The findings in this report document a nearly 17-fold increase in the annual number of mammograms performed in Wisconsin during 1980-1993. Although the estimated number of mammograms performed each year differed substantially by data source, the trends were similar for both sources. Two important factors probably contributed to the increase in mammography use during this period: 1) the substantial increase in the acceptance and use of screening mammography among physicians during the 1980s (3) and 2) initiation of extensive efforts to educate the public and health-care professionals about national screening mammography guidelines, which were implemented during the late 1980s (4). Other possible contributing factors include the initiation of low-cost mammography screening programs (5) and wider availability of high-quality, low-cost mammography equipment beginning during the early 1980s.

The findings in this report are subject to limitations associated with the two data sources. Although the provider survey is an example of a low-cost, efficient method to characterize trends in mammography use, it does not collect information about sociodemographic variables and may overestimate mammography use because data were based on the number of mammograms performed and some women receive more than one mammogram each year. In addition, the estimates based on the self-reported BRFSS data probably were higher than those from the provider survey for at least three reasons. First, some women who reported having had a mammogram during the previous 12 months probably received the mammogram greater than 12 months previously (6-8). Second, women who participated in the BRFSS may not be representative of the total population of women in Wisconsin because they had telephones, were better educated, or were more likely to have had insurance coverage -- factors related to an increased likelihood of having received a mammogram. Third, the BRFSS is a household survey that does not include institutionalized women (e.g., those in long-term-care facilities), who are less likely than noninstitutionalized women to receive mammograms (9).

The findings in this report are being used in Wisconsin to further identify groups of women who underuse mammography screening, develop intervention strategies to increase mammography use, and assess progress toward the year 2000 national health objectives for breast cancer and mammography (objectives 16.11 and 16.16) (10). This approach can be adapted for use by health departments in other states to assess the effectiveness of efforts to promote mammography screening.

References

  1. Remington PL, Lantz P. Mammography guidelines and practices in Wisconsin, 1987-1988. Wis Med J 1989;88:38-42.

  2. Lantz P, Bunge M, Remington PL. Trends in mammography in Wisconsin, 1980-1989. Wis Med J 1990;89:281-2.

  3. Anonymous. 1989 Survey of Physician's Attitudes and Practices in Early Cancer Detection. CA Canc J Clin 1990;40:77-101.

  4. Council on Scientific Affairs. Mammographic screening in asymptomatic women aged 40 years and older. JAMA 1989;261:2535-42.

  5. Richards MJS, Inhorn SL. Breast cancer detection awareness project in Wisconsin, 1987-1988. Wis Med J 1989;88:7-9.

  6. Biemer PP, Groves RM, Lyberg LE, Mathiowetz NA, Sudman S, eds. Measurement errors in surveys. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991:134-7.

  7. Whitman S, Lacey L, Ansell D, Chen EH, Dell J, Phillips CW. Do chart reviews and interviews produce the same information about breast and cervical cancer? Int J Epi 1993;22:393-7.

  8. Degnan D, Harris R, Ranney J, Quade D, Earp JA, Gonzalez J. Measuring the use of mammography: two methods compared. Am J Public Health 1992;82:1386-8.

  9. Kenny J, Keenan P. A survey of breast cancer detection methods in long-term care facilities. J Gerontol Nurs 1991;17:20-2.

  10. Public Health Service. Health people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives -- full report, with commentary. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1991; DHHS publication no. (PHS)90-50212.



Table_1
Note: To print large tables and graphs users may have to change their printer settings to landscape and use a small font size.

TABLE 1. Estimated annual number of mammograms -- Wisconsin, 1980-1993 *
======================================================================================
      Mammography provider survey         BRFSS
      ---------------------------   -------------------         % Difference
         No.      Estimated no.     Estimated no. women      (% BRFSS greater
Year   providers   mammograms       who had a mammogram     than provider survey)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1980       76        31,000                  NA &                    NA
1981       76        34,000                  NA                      NA
1982       83        39,000                  NA                      NA
1983       85        50,000                  NA                      NA
1984       93        74,000                  NA                      NA
1985      126       130,000                  NA                      NA
1986      142       188,000                  NA                      NA
1987      145       237,000               389,000                    64%
1988      167       276,000               499,000                    81%
1989      183       334,000               499,000                    45%
1990      198       383,000               516,000                    35%
1991      218       455,000               608,000                    34%
1992      228       466,000               638,000                    37%
1993      236       517,000               607,000                    17%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Based on data from annual mammography provider surveys for 1989-1993 (the 1989
  survey requested information for 1980-1989) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Survey
  System (BRFSS) for 1987-1993.
+ Standard errors for annual BRFSS estimates ranged from +/-1.5% to +/-1.7%.
& Not available.
======================================================================================

Return to top.


Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.


All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

 
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #