FIGURE I. PERCENTAGE OF ISOLATES WITH INTERMEDIATE RESISTANCE OR RESISTANCE TO CIPROFLOXACIN, 2000-2018

FIGURE I. PERCENTAGE OF ISOLATES WITH INTERMEDIATE RESISTANCE OR RESISTANCE TO CIPROFLOXACIN, 2000-2018
CLINIC Percentage
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
ALBUQUERQUE Intermediate Resistance . . . . . 5.7 . . 2.0 . 4.8 5.3 5.3 3.6 3.5 . . . 0.5
Resistance . . . . . . 7.3 16.7 6.9 7.3 22.9 21.7 16.4 15.1 6.1 9.6 15.7 22.6 12.4
ANCHORAGE Intermediate Resistance . 1.9 3.7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resistance 6.9 . 3.7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.9
ATLANTA Intermediate Resistance 1.5 0.5 0.4 . . . . . . 0.4 0.3 2.5 2.5 3.7 2.3 0.7 0.3 2.5 3.5
Resistance . . . . 0.9 3.8 5.7 2.6 10.3 5.2 4.9 7.2 7.2 10.7 19.0 19.7 28.6 33.8 33.6
BIRMINGHAM Intermediate Resistance . . . . 0.3 0.3 . . . 1.0 3.8 10.8 3.7 6.5 0.4 2.3 5.8 11.4 4.1
Resistance . . . . . 1.0 1.1 9.4 8.3 10.0 10.9 17.9 14.7 8.5 15.7 15.4 16.4 23.6 25.5
BOSTON Intermediate Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3 . 3.2 .
Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.8 15.8 44.8 41.9 45.7
BUFFALO Intermediate Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1 1.4 . 0.7 .
Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.9 21.4 38.3 15.4 14.7
CHICAGO Intermediate Resistance 0.5 . 2.1 2.8 3.0 3.9 3.7 2.2 1.9 0.9 . 0.4 0.4 . 0.8 4.0 1.6 1.3 .
Resistance . . . 2.1 2.3 4.7 4.1 8.6 5.3 9.8 19.2 10.4 8.4 7.7 10.9 14.7 22.4 24.1 21.4
CLEVELAND Intermediate Resistance 0.8 . 0.4 0.3 2.7 8.1 4.1 5.6 0.8 0.4 . . . 0.6 1.8 3.3 0.8 . 5.1
Resistance . . . 0.3 0.4 2.8 3.1 0.7 4.1 0.4 0.9 1.5 1.1 1.2 5.3 13.0 9.2 16.4 15.4
COLUMBUS Intermediate Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 0.3 . 0.7 0.7 0.3
Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1 3.3 5.3 15.7 21.7 27.0 29.5
DALLAS Intermediate Resistance 0.4 . . . 0.3 1.4 0.7 . . 0.3 4.1 3.7 3.2 1.0 1.3 0.7 2.0 2.8 4.3
Resistance . . . 2.0 3.0 3.2 6.1 7.5 7.1 6.7 7.8 4.5 11.7 10.5 10.7 17.0 24.7 20.6 29.0
DENVER Intermediate Resistance . . . 0.3 . . . . 1.2 4.3 5.4 1.6 3.6 2.5 . . . . 0.8
Resistance . 0.3 . 0.7 8.3 10.9 15.7 17.0 10.7 11.3 14.2 17.6 16.1 18.1 . . . . 36.3
GREENSBORO Intermediate Resistance . . . . . 1.1 . . . . . . . . . 0.4 4.1 1.9 4.1
Resistance . . . . 0.8 0.6 1.7 5.3 3.6 0.6 1.6 4.7 7.8 3.0 12.7 22.8 30.9 31.4 20.1
HONOLULU Intermediate Resistance 4.8 3.8 4.3 5.8 . 1.1 1.1 1.4 . . . 1.6 1.0 . . . 0.8 . 1.3
Resistance 14.3 20.3 11.7 13.3 22.8 19.3 35.8 28.6 40.5 44.6 34.6 29.5 18.4 11.0 39.3 21.1 21.1 18.9 25.0
INDIANAPOLIS Intermediate Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.7 . 0.3 . 1.3 2.7
Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.0 12.3 14.8 11.0 13.7 18.2
JACKSON Intermediate Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.8
Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42.9
KANSAS CITY Intermediate Resistance . . . . . . . 1.8 0.4 . . 2.3 2.3 0.3 3.0 1.5 4.3 6.7 7.0
Resistance . . . . . . . 16.4 7.5 1.3 1.0 2.0 2.0 9.7 10.8 18.9 21.0 27.7 34.3
LAS VEGAS Intermediate Resistance . . . 0.3 . 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.0 . 1.0 3.2 1.7 2.0 1.3 0.7 1.7 3.9
Resistance . . . 2.4 2.4 5.4 8.7 18.7 17.7 11.0 7.7 8.9 19.8 27.3 17.0 25.3 28.3 32.7 34.2
LOS ANGELES Intermediate Resistance . . . 0.5 0.4 . . 1.2 . . 1.5 . 2.0 . . . 0.8 1.5 1.3
Resistance . . . 12.4 13.8 14.5 22.7 22.4 16.8 13.3 16.7 28.2 34.9 34.5 25.1 22.2 44.4 42.7 51.3
MIAMI Intermediate Resistance . 0.4 1.7 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.5 0.4 . 0.5 0.6 0.5 1.1 . . . . .
Resistance . . 0.4 2.0 6.8 9.1 19.8 19.5 16.2 12.3 15.3 23.5 25.0 23.0 . . . . 52.6
MILWAUKEE Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11.0
MINNEAPOLIS Intermediate Resistance 0.3 . . . 0.8 . 0.4 . . . . 4.3 . . 2.9 3.8 2.2 . .
Resistance . . 0.5 2.3 9.3 8.0 5.7 10.7 7.6 24.4 23.9 23.4 11.5 17.5 20.4 37.1 31.1 28.1 27.1
NEW ORLEANS Intermediate Resistance . 0.8 . . . . . 0.4 . . 2.1 2.0 4.9 7.2 2.3 . 1.2 0.7 1.6
Resistance 0.4 . . 0.4 1.5 6.3 10.2 18.1 14.9 7.9 12.8 11.3 9.4 12.0 12.9 20.6 24.8 27.5 35.8
NEW YORK CITY Intermediate Resistance . . . . . . . 1.1 4.1 . 0.5 . 1.6 . . 2.1 . 1.5 0.5
Resistance . . . . . . 7.5 14.9 15.4 15.6 13.6 16.7 9.8 17.7 23.5 34.0 34.8 42.9 42.3
ORANGE COUNTY Intermediate Resistance . 1.6 0.6 0.6 1.9 1.7 0.8 . . . 1.0 5.6 1.6 0.8 1.2 0.5 1.0 . .
Resistance 5.6 2.3 11.4 31.5 20.5 27.5 34.6 41.0 33.3 18.3 23.1 25.2 33.9 44.4 30.4 29.0 38.1 44.3 46.6
PHILADELPHIA Intermediate Resistance 0.3 0.3 . 0.3 0.3 . . . . 0.5 0.7 . . 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.0
Resistance . . 1.0 1.3 3.3 14.3 30.3 29.1 20.6 15.5 13.9 7.6 20.3 14.0 23.0 25.3 21.7 37.5 38.7
PHOENIX Intermediate Resistance 3.4 2.1 . 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 . . . 0.5 0.7 2.0 . . 0.7 1.0 0.3 1.7
Resistance . . 0.3 2.6 6.6 7.1 11.9 8.7 16.5 15.9 15.6 10.7 10.7 13.0 21.0 28.7 28.0 20.0 23.3
PONTIAC Intermediate Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.5 3.0 2.0 . 0.4 1.2
Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 6.3 11.1 13.6 25.1 24.7 26.4
PORTLAND Intermediate Resistance 2.0 2.1 2.6 3.0 0.5 . 1.8 . . . . 0.6 0.9 . . 1.4 . 0.8 .
Resistance . . 1.7 3.0 11.5 23.1 27.2 28.6 51.6 20.0 25.5 24.0 20.9 14.7 37.5 34.5 47.6 38.7 22.6
SAN DIEGO Intermediate Resistance 0.4 1.7 1.2 1.6 0.8 0.7 1.5 1.6 . 0.6 2.4 4.8 3.9 3.4 2.8 1.1 1.0 1.5 2.0
Resistance 0.4 2.1 16.5 13.2 20.6 26.2 35.1 36.3 29.1 20.9 20.0 31.4 38.5 31.8 30.3 31.2 40.4 55.9 49.0
SAN FRANCISCO Intermediate Resistance 9.9 17.2 9.9 3.6 4.0 3.0 . . 0.5 0.8 1.7 0.9 1.2 . 0.3 4.3 0.7 1.3 0.8
Resistance 0.3 3.4 6.7 19.2 24.3 31.3 44.5 31.3 26.1 10.0 18.3 32.1 32.9 34.9 33.0 30.0 29.3 40.0 41.7
SEATTLE Intermediate Resistance 2.3 2.8 3.7 3.5 3.4 0.4 13.2 19.1 14.1 4.9 0.4 1.2 . . . . 1.1 0.8 0.9
Resistance 0.9 . 3.0 7.0 16.2 11.6 31.8 29.3 31.3 21.0 47.9 41.9 32.2 44.1 38.1 27.8 29.3 32.5 43.8
TRIPLER Resistance . . . 4.2 28.6 . . . . 16.7 . . . 36.4 30.0 9.1 50.0 . 40.0
WASHINGTON DC Resistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50.0