Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing
NIOSH is strongly committed to program evaluation as a way to maximize its contributions to improved occupational safety and health. Regular review of program activities, outputs, and outcomes is essential to demonstrating program performance. The Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing (AgFF) Program conducts reviews and shares program impact in a variety of ways.
Program Performance One-pager
Program Performance One-Pagers (PPOPs) are a snapshot of NIOSH programs’ priorities, strategies used to make progress towards priorities, recent accomplishments, and upcoming work.
- Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing Program Performance One-pagerpdf icon
- Central States Center for Agricultural Safety and Healthpdf icon
- Great Plains Center for Agricultural Healthpdf icon
- Pacific Northwest Agricultural Safety and Health Centerpdf icon
- National Children’s Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safetypdf icon
- Northeast Center for Occupational Health and Safetypdf icon
- Southeast Center for Agricultural Health and Injury Preventionpdf icon
- Upper Midwest Agricultural Safety and Health Centerpdf icon
- Western Center for Agricultural Health and Safetypdf icon
Impact Sheets briefly describe an occupational safety or health hazard, the specific NIOSH or NIOSH-funded research activity that was conducted to address the hazard, the resulting impact or recommendations, and relevant statistics.
Safety and health in agriculture
- NIOSH-funded Study Results in Improved Pesticide Testing Methods and Updated Regulations to Protect Agricultural Workers
- NIOSH Pesticide Poisoning Monitoring Program Protects Farmworkers
- Use of Model Farmers Proves Effective in Increasing Safety Practices Among Navajo Agricultural Workers
- A NIOSH-funded Research Study Improves Safety and Health of Farm Workers and Their Families
Safety in commercial fishing
- PFD Manufacturer Adopts NIOSH Research into Product Development Process
- NIOSH Research Cited in Recommendations for Improving Commercial Fishing Safety
National Academies Review
NIOSH understands that external expert review is one of the most valid and accepted methods of evaluating research programs. Consequently, NIOSH requested that the National Academies evaluate NIOSH research programs with respect to their impact, relevance, and future directions. In 2007 the National Academies was asked to evaluate what NIOSH research programs are producing and to determine the extent to which NIOSH research is responsible for changes in the workplace that reduce the risk of occupational injuries, illnesses, and deaths. More information is available at the National Academies Evaluation of NIOSH Research Programs page.
2012 Independent Program Review
An independent review of the NIOSH AgFF Program was completed in June 2012 as a follow-up to the 2007 National Academies review. The 2012 review covered the period 2006-2011. This review was not conducted by the National Academies, however, many members of the 2007 National Academies review panel participated in the 2012 review and an identical framework, criteria, and scoring structure was used.
The findings of the 2012 review recognized the AgFF Program for building new partnerships, developing a comprehensive set of goals, addressing many of the recommendations from the 2007 review, and achieving multiple impacts and outcomes. The recent progress and accomplishments of the NIOSH AgFF program were reflected in the 2012 review scores of 5 (out of 5) for relevance of its work to improve occupational safety and health within the sector and 4 (out of 5) for impact on reducing workplace illnesses and injuries. Primary recommendations of the five-year review include surveillance, worksite size dilemmas, defining worksite ‘populations at risk’, use of printed media, emerging animal agriculture production practices, forestry and fishing issues, and climate change implications.