Public Docket for 42 CFR 83 (Special Exposure Cohort)

• Letter to Advisory Board dated November 17, 2020 pdf icon[PDF – 258 KB]

Public Comments – In Order of Received – on SEC Amendments: Interim Final Rule with Request for Comments published on December 22, 2005

• Comments from Daniel W. McKeel, Jr., M.D. Comments on Proposed Amendments to 42 CFR Part 83, Special Exposure Cohort Rule. Received on March 23, 2006. pdf icon[26 KB (6 pages)]
• Comments from Virginia R. McKeel. Comments on Proposed Amendments to 42 CFR Part 83, Special Exposure Cohort Rule. Received on March 23, 2006. pdf icon[21 KB (3 pages)]
• Comments from the Government Accountability Project (GAP). Comments on HHS Interim Final Rule–Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. Received on March 20, 2006. pdf icon[39 KB (8 pages)]
• Advisory Board’s Comments on the Proposed Amendments to 42 CFR Part 83 (Special Exposure Cohort). Received on March 14, 2006. pdf icon[47 KB (3 pages)]
• Comments from a Private Citizen on SEC Interim Final Rule Request for Comments, 14 pp. Received on February 28, 2006. pdf icon[1.38 MB (14 pages)]
• Comments from Senator Harry Reid: Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000; Amendments; Interim Final Rule with Request for Comments. Received on February 22, 2006. pdf icon[542 KB (3 pages)]
• Comments from the Alliance of Nuclear Worker Advocacy Groups, 2 pp. Received on February 21, 2006. pdf icon[170 KB (3 pages)]
• Comments from a Private Citizen on SEC Interim Final Rule Request for Comments, 2 pp. Received on January 13, 2006. pdf icon[217 KB (2 pages)]

Public Comments on Proposed Rule Published on Friday, March 7, 2003

• Comments from Sensenbrenner et al., NIOSH Proposed Rule on Special Exposure Cohorts, 6 pp. Received on May 27, 2003. pdf icon[255 KB (6 pages)]
• Comments from Silver et al., Los Alamos P.O.W.S. Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort under EEOICPA Act of 2000, 3 pp. Received on May 7, 2003. pdf icon[170 KB (3 pages)]
• Comments from Judy Yeater, United Steelworkers of America. Comments Regarding Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort, 5 pp. Received on May 6, 2003. pdf icon[293 KB (5 pages)]
• Comments from R. William Field, University of Iowa. Comments Regarding Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort, 7 pp. Received on May 6, 2003. pdf icon[324 KB (7 pages)]
• Comments from Inga Olson, Tri-Valley CARES. Comments Regarding the HHS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 4 pp. Received May 6, 2003. pdf icon[199 KB (4 pages)]
• Comments from Daniel McKeel, WUSTL. Comments on Proposed Rulemaking SEC and EEOICPA, 4 pp. Received on May 6, 2003. pdf icon[333 KB (4 pages)]
• Comments from Robert McGarrah, AFL-CIO. AFL-CIO Comments, 7 pp. Received on May 6, 2003. pdf icon[403 KB (7 pages)]
• Comments from Senator Jeff Bingaman, Senator Edward Kennedy, Senator Chuck Grassley, and Senator Patty Murray. NIOSH Proposed Rules on Special Exposure Cohort, 4 pp. Received on May 6, 2003. pdf icon[174 KB (4 pages)]
• Comments from Pete Stafford, AFL-CIO. Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO Comments on NIOSH SEC Rule, 4 pp. Received on May 6, 2003. pdf icon[261 KB (4 pages)]
• Comments from John Abbotts and Tim Takaro, University of Washington. Comments on Proposed Procedures for Special Exposure Cohort, 6 pp. Received on May 6, 2003. pdf icon[325 KB (6 pages)]
• Comments from Denise Brock. Comments on Proposed Rule, 3 pp. Received on May 6, 2003. pdf icon[253 KB (3 pages)]
• Comments from the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health. Comments on 42 CFR Part 83, March 7, 2003: Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (42 CFR 83), 5 pp. Received on May 5, 2003. pdf icon[240 KB (5 pages)]
• Comments from John Frazier, Health Physics Society. Health Physics Society Comments on 42CFR83, 5 pp. Received on May 5, 2003. pdf icon[256 KB (5 pages)]
• Comments from Richard Miller, GAP. Government Accountability Project (GAP) Comments on 42 CFR Part 83, 16 pp. Received on May 3, 2003. pdf icon[1.1 MB (16 pages)]
• Comments from Gene Branham, Fernald Atomic Trades and Labor Council. Comments of the Fernald Atomic Trades and Labor Council Regarding the HHS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort, 12 pp. Received on May 2, 2003. pdf icon[2 MB (12 pages)]
• Comments from Randy Rabinowitz, PACE. EEOICPA Comments, 9 pp. Received on May 1, 2003. pdf icon[546 KB (9 pages)]
• Comments from Eric Parker, PACE. Comments on NIOSH SEC Rule, 10 pp. Received on April 30, 2003. pdf icon[604 KB (10 pages)]
• Comments from Cheryl Montgomery. Comments Regarding 42 CFR Part 83 Proposed Rule, 2 pp. Received on April 7, 20003. pdf icon[57 KB (2 pages)]
• Comment from private person. Comments on Proposed Rule Change for SEC, 1 pg. Received on April 6, 2003. pdf icon[60 KB (1 page)]

Public Comments – in Order of Received – on Proposed Rule Published on Tuesday, June 25, 2002

• Comments from Donald Good. Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) (42 CFR Part 83), 2 pp. Received on August 26, 2002. pdf icon[68 KB (2 pages)]
• Comments from Pete Stafford; The Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO. BCTD Comments on SEC: Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act of 200; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 7 pp. Received on August 26, 2002. pdf icon[383 KB (7 pages)]
• Comments from Phillip Schofield; LA-POWS. SEC, 2 pp. Received on August 26, 2002. pdf icon[48 KB (2 pages)]
• Comments from Robert McGarrah; Coordinator for Workers’ Compensation; AFL-CIO Safety and Health. AFL-CIO Comments on Proposed SEC Rules, 5 pp. Received on August 26, 2002. pdf icon[276 KB (5 pages)]
• Comments from Dr. John Frazier; President; Health Physics Society. HPS Comments on 42 CFR 83, 21 pp. Received on August 26, 2002. pdf icon[1.1 MB (21 pages)]
• Comments from Gary Bumgarner; President, International Association of Fire Fighters, Local I-24 Hanford Fire Fighters. Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) 42 CFR Part 83, 2 pp. Received on August 26, 2002. pdf icon[49 KB (2 pages)]
• Comments from Gene Branham and Robert Tabor; Fernald Atomic Trades and Labor Council. Fernald Atomic Trades and Labor Council Comments on HHS’s Proposed Rule: “Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000,” 42 CFR Part 82; 16 pp. Received on August 26, 2002. pdf icon[840 KB (16 pages)]
• Comments from Bill Hayes; Deputy Fire Chief. Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) (42 CFR Part 83), 2 pp. Received on August 25, 2002. pdf icon[107 KB (2 pages)]
• Comments from Private Citizen. Special Cohort Status for Nevada Test Site Workers, 1 pg. Received on August 25, 2002. pdf icon[43 KB (1 page)]
• Comments from Eric Parker; Vice President and Health and Safety Chairman; Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union (PACE) Local 5-4200. PACE Local 5-4200 Comments on HHS’s Proposed Rule: “Procedures for Designating Classes of Employees as Members of the Special Exposure Cohort Under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000”; 42 CFR Part 83, 5 pp. Received on August 23, 2002. pdf icon[261 KB (5 pages)]
• Comments from Tim Takaro and John Abbotts; Department of Environmental Health, University of Washington. Comments Proposed Procedures for Special Exposure Cohort, 5 pp. Received on August 23, 2002. pdf icon[260 KB (5 pages)]
• Comments from Randy Rabinowitz; Consultant; Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union (PACE). Comments Proposed Procedures for Designating Additional Members, 7 pp. Received on August 23, 2002. pdf icon[430 KB (7 pages)]
• Comments from Robert Bistline, U.S. Department of Energy. Comments on 42 CFR Part 83, 2 pp. Received on August 23, 2002. pdf icon[72 KB (2 pages)]
• Comments from Mike Schaeffer, Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Comments on 42 CFR Part 83, 3 pp. Received on August 23, 2002. pdf icon[116 KB (3 pages)]
• Comments from the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health. Recommendations and Comments from of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health, 6 pp. Received on August 22, 2002. pdf icon[878 KB (6 pages)]
• Comments from Louis Clark, Executive Director, Government Accountability Project. Comments on Sec Rule, 14 pp. Received on August 20, 2002. pdf icon[712 KB (14 pages)]
• Comments from Frank Roddy. Comments on 42CFR83, 2 pp. Received on August 21, 2002. pdf icon[49 KB (2 pages)]
• Comments from Private Citizen. Special Cohort, 2 pp. Received on August 21, 2002. pdf icon[69 KB (2 pages)]
• Comments from Private Citizen. Untitled, 1 pg. Received on August 18, 2002. pdf icon[56 KB (1 page)]
• Comments from Jerry Tudor; United Sick Oppressed Laborers (USOL); Coalition for Healthy Environment (CHE). Special Cohort Additions, 2 pp. Received on August 16, 2002. pdf icon[70 KB (2 pages)]
• Comments from Private Citizen. Comments on Proposed Rulemaking, Added Cohorts, Sick or Diseased Workers, 2 pp. Received on August 15, 2002. pdf icon[119 KB (2 pages)]
• Private Citizen Comments for The Public Docket for 42 CFR 82 (Special Exposure Cohort). Comments on Proposed Rules, 1 pg. Received on August 1, 2002. pdf icon[54 KB (1 page)]
• Comments from Private Citizen. Comments on Proposed Rules, 1 pg. Received on July 1, 2002. pdf icon[15 KB (1 page)]