NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Considerations for recommending extended use and limited reuse of filtering facepiece respirators in healthcare settings.

Fisher EM; Shaffer RE

J Occup Environ Hyg 2014 Aug; 11(8):D115-D128

https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2014.902954

20043957

Public health organizations, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are increasingly recommending the use of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) in healthcare settings. For infection control purposes, the usual practice is to discard FFRs after close contact with a patient ("single use"). However, in some situations, such as during contact with tuberculosis patients, limited FFR reuse (i.e., repeated donning and doffing of the same FFR by the same person) is practiced. A related practice, extended use, involves wearing the same FFR for multiple patient encounters without doffing. Extended use and limited FFR reuse have been recommended during infectious disease outbreaks and pandemics to conserve FFR supplies. This commentary examines CDC recommendations related to FFR extended use and limited reuse and analyzes available data from the literature to provide a relative estimate of the risks of these practices compared to single use. Analysis of the available data and the use of disease transmission models indicate that decisions regarding whether FFR extended use or reuse should be recommended should continue to be pathogen and event-specific. Factors to be included in developing the recommendations are the potential for the pathogen to spread via contact transmission, the potential that the event could result in or is currently causing an FFR shortage, the protection provided by FFR use, human factors, potential for self-inoculation, the potential for secondary exposures, and government policies and regulations. While recent findings largely support the previous recommendations for extended use and limited reuse in certain situations, some new cautions and limitations should be considered before issuing recommendations in the future. In general, extended use of FFRs is preferred over limited FFR reuse. Limited FFR reuse would allow the user a brief respite from extended wear times, but increases the risk of self-inoculation and preliminary data from one study suggests that some FFR models may begin to lose effectiveness after multiple donnings.

Respirators; Respiratory-equipment; Air-purifying-respirators; Filters; Face-masks; Health-care-personnel; Health-care-facilities; Medical-personnel; Personal-protective-equipment; Public-health; Infection-control; Work-environment; Work-practices; Worker-health; Infectious-diseases; Disease-transmission; Pathogens; Respiratory-protection; Respiratory-protective-equipment; Author Keywords: Filter facepiece respirator; reuse; extended use; respiratory pathogens

Ronald E. Shaffer, Technology Research Branch, National Personal Protective Technology Lab, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Building 20, P.O. Box 18070, Pittsburgh, PA 15236

JOEHA2

20140801

Journal Article

RShaffer@cdc.gov

2014

M032014

8

1545-9624

NPPTL

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

PA