Job control, psychological demand, and farmworker health: evidence from the National Agricultural Workers Survey.
Grzywacz-JG; Alterman-T; Gabbard-S; Shen-R; Nakamoto-J; Carroll-DJ; Muntaner-C
J Occup Environ Med 2014 Jan; 56(1):66-71
Objective: Improve understanding of the potential occupational health impact of how agricultural jobs are organized. Exposure to low job control, high psychological demands, and high job strain were hypothesized to have greater risk for poor self-rated physical health and elevated depressive symptoms. Methods: Cross-sectional data (N = 3691) obtained using the Work Organization and Psychosocial Factors module of the US National Agricultural Workers Survey fielded in 2009-2010. Results: More than one fifth (22.4%) of farmworkers reported fair/poor health, and 8.7% reported elevated depressive symptoms. High psychological demand was associated with increased risk of fair/poor health (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 2.2) and elevated depressive symptoms (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 3.8). Conclusions: The organization of work in field agriculture may pose risks for poor occupational health outcomes among a vulnerable worker population.
Agriculture; Agricultural-workers; Agricultural-industry; Farmers; Job-analysis; Job-stress; Work-organization; Psychological-effects; Worker-health; Health-surveys; Mental-health; Analytical-models; Analytical-processes; Risk-analysis; Risk-factors; Surveillance-programs
Joseph G. Grzywacz, PhD, Department of Human Development and Family Science, Oklahoma State University, 700 N Greenwood Ave, Main Hall #2120, Tulsa, OK 74106
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine