NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search
A systematic review of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature, 1990-2005.
Lamontagne-AD; Keegel-T; Louie-AM; Ostry-A; Landsbergis-PA
Int J Occup Environ Health 2007 Jul; 13(3):268-280
Ninety reports of systematic evaluations of job-stress interventions were rated in terms of the degree of systems approach used. A high rating was defined as both organizationally and individually focused, versus moderate (organizational only), and low (individual only). Studies using high-rated approaches represent a growing proportion of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature. Individual-focused, low-rated approaches are effective at the individual level, favorably affecting individual-level outcomes, but tend not to have favorable impacts at the organizational level. Organizationally-focused high- and moderate-rated approaches are beneficial at both individual and organizational levels. Further measures are needed to foster the dissemination and implementation of systems approaches to examining interventions for job stress.
Occupational-hazards; Health-hazards; Statistical-analysis; Stress; Work-environment; Work-analysis; Worker-motivation; Workplace-studies
A. D. LaMontagne, McCaughey Centre: VicHealth Centre for the Promotion of Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Issue of Publication
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Page last reviewed: September 2, 2020
Content source: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Education and Information Division