Seatbelt use during tractor overturns.
Myers-ML; Cole-HP; Westneat-SC
J Agric Saf Health 2006 Feb; 12(1):43-49
In 2002, the Kentucky Farm Tractor Overturn Survey was administered, in which 6,063 randomly selected farm operators responded to questions that addressed the presence and use of seatbelts in the event of a tractor overturn. Data were analyzed to determine the proportion of seatbelt presence and use on tractors that overturned differentiated by whether they were equipped or not equipped with a rollover protective structure (ROPS). In 537 overturns reported for which the ROPS status was known, 92 involved ROPS-equipped tractors, of which 60 had a functioning seatbelt, and 19 operators of these tractors used the seatbelt that was present during the overturn. However, of the 445 overturns of non-ROPS tractors, eight had a functioning seatbelt, and three of these operators wore the seatbelt. Two of the three operators that wore seatbelts on non-ROPS tractors suffered a permanent disability. In contrast, of the 19 operators who wore a seatbelt on ROPS-equipped tractors, 18 experienced no or minor injuries, and one required outpatient care. Seatbelts are known to save lives but are a secondary safety device to ROPS, for ROPS alone saves lives and is a necessary pre-condition for seatbelt presence and use.
Tractors; Occupational-hazards; Safety-belts; Safety-equipment; Safety-measures; Safety-practices; Agriculture; Agricultural-workers; Agricultural-industry; Agricultural-machinery; Injuries; Injury-prevention;
Author Keywords: Injuries; Overturns; Rollovers; Seatbelts; Tractors
Agriculture; Cooperative Agreement
Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health
University of Kentucky