NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search
Effect of position and motion on personal exposure in a HVLP spray painting operation.
Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1997 Jan; 1-77
Worker exposure to particles is a problem in most spray painting processes. Previous studies, using a stationary mannequin and simple spray nozzle, showed that dimensional analysis could be used to correlate a dimensionless breathing zone concentration (which requires knowing the gun transfer efficiency) with a dimensionless nozzle pressure term (the Carlton number). This work expands on that study by using a real high volume-low pressure (HVLP) gun, and adding a representative spraying motion. A robot-mannequin, capable of holding and actuating the spray gun, and also performing a repeated side-to-side spraying motion was used. Vacuum pump oil was sprayed onto a flat plate in a wind tunnel to determine the relationship between nozzle pressure and breathing zone concentration. "Breathing zone" samples were collected using a cassette modified to mimic the 10M inlet. Data collected in the absence of motion show that the dimensionless concentration in the 900 position is lower than the 1800 position until a crossover point is reached at low values of the Carlton number (8 x 10s). After this point, the dimensionless breathing zone concentration in the 1800 position is lower than in the 900 orientation. For the case with motion, the importance of position to dimensionless breathing zone concentration was mitigated. Using task representative Carlton number values (alpha values) allows for simplification of the results. Alpha values for the 900 and 1800 orientations without motion were 0.232 and 0.028. It was observed that the motion mitigated the positional effect in such a way as to make the alpha value for motion close to the average of the two no motion alpha values, 0.102. These results allow for the supposition of a formula to predict breathing zone concentrations or transfer efficiencies for conventional and HVLP spraying guns. The results also stress the association between contaminant generation, transport, and exposure. Models, such as the one used, are beneficial because they relate exposure to processes parameters that can be controlled to reduce it.
Models; Mathematical models; Spray painting; Paint spraying; Paints; Occupational exposure; Work environment; Air contamination; Sampling methods; Aerosols; Aerosol particles
Research Tools and Approaches: Exposure Assessment Methods
Effect of position and motion on personal exposure in a HVLP spray painting operation
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Page last reviewed: June 15, 2021
Content source: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Education and Information Division