NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search
Respirator testing in non-clinical settings: I. Relative consistency of field versus laboratory measurements.
Harber-P; Hsu-P; Beck-J; Brown-C
NIOSH 1992 Jan; :1-11
This study compared the intra-person consistency in measurements of respirator effect when determined in a laboratory and when determined in a field course setting. Results demonstrated that for physiologic parameters (including respiratory timing and ventilatory volumes) as well as subjective responses, field course measurements were at least as consistent as laboratory measurements. Because field measurements are inherently more likely to be work-related than routine clinical testing, their use may become increasingly important due to changes in the standard of practice and legal requirements, such as the Americans with Disability Act. A simple standardized field course may be developed without extensive equipment, and workers may be tested using their routine respirators on this course as a screening procedure to select the small number of workers who require extensive medical evaluation.
Respirators; Respiratory-protective-equipment; Personal-protective-equipment; Medical-screening; Laboratory-testing; Measurement-equipment; Materials-testing; Physiological-factors; Ventilation; Field-study; Standards
University of California, Department of Medicine, Occupational Medicine Branch, Los Angeles, CA 90024-7027
Final Grant Report
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
University of California, Department of Medicine, Occupational Medicine Branch, Los Angeles, California
Page last reviewed: April 12, 2019
Content source: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Education and Information Division