A field test of two moist-cloth wipes for sampling lead in surface dust.
Authors
Ewers L
Source
American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, June 1-6, 2002, San Diego, California. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association, 2002 Jun; :96
Link
NIOSHTIC No.
20022547
Abstract
A recent NIOSH health hazard evaluation, conducted for a small neon-sign manufacturer, provided an opportunity to compare two moist cloth wipes (Ghost wipes and Wash'n Dri) used to sample lead (Pb) in surface dust (NIOSH Method 9100). Each of two work surfaces (right and left) was sampled using a template in four side-by-side locations. In one of these four locations, a first-wipe sample with a Ghost wipe was followed by second-wipe sample with a Wash'n Dri. In other locations, a Wash'n Dri was followed by a Ghost wipe, a Ghost wipe was followed by a Ghost wipe, or a Wash'n Dri was followed by a Wash'n Dri. This same pattern of samples was repeated on the second work surface, resulting in a total of eight samples. Both types of wipes were analyzed using NIOSH Method 7300. A t-test of the two types of surface wipes revealed no significant difference between them with regard to the amount of Pb collected on the first wipe (Ghost mean = 47 micrograms Pb, Wash'n Dri mean = 34 micrograms Pb, p = 0.67). However, a marked difference existed between the lead collected from the two work surfaces (mean of left surface = 12 micrograms Pb, range 10 - 13; mean of right surface = 71 micrograms Pb, range 46 - 90). More important, the relative collection efficiency, defined by ASTM as the ratio of the amount of lead collected with the first-time wipe to the amount of lead collected with the second-time wipe, was less (range from 1.4 - 4.1) from an area with a heavy lead loading than with a light lead loading (range from 4.8 - 8.7). Based on the differing relative collection efficiencies, we concluded that wipe samples may have limitations when comparing surfaces containing differing amounts of lead.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving the CDC website.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website.
For more information on CDC's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
CDC.gov Privacy Settings
We take your privacy seriously. You can review and change the way we collect information below.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
Cookies used to make website functionality more relevant to you. These cookies perform functions like remembering presentation options or choices and, in some cases, delivery of web content that based on self-identified area of interests.
Cookies used to track the effectiveness of CDC public health campaigns through clickthrough data.
Cookies used to enable you to share pages and content that you find interesting on CDC.gov through third party social networking and other websites. These cookies may also be used for advertising purposes by these third parties.
Thank you for taking the time to confirm your preferences. If you need to go back and make any changes, you can always do so by going to our Privacy Policy page.