Epidemiology of occupational carcinogens and mutagens.
Authors
Ruder AM
Source
Occup Med: State of the Art Rev 1996 Jul; 11(3):487-512
Link
NIOSHTIC No.
00235991
Abstract
Epidemiological issues related to occupational carcinogens and mutagens were reviewed. A search was conducted in the Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances database; 654 substances were discovered which had reviews from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and exposure estimates from either the National Occupational Exposure Survey or the National Occupational Hazard Survey. The IARC's rating system, in which carcinogens were classified according to evidence of carcinogenicity as sufficient, limited, insufficient, and lack of evidence, was discussed. Although epidemiological studies were considered useful to the study of occupational carcinogenicity, in-vitro mutagen assays were regarded as the more efficient and cost effective study type. Based on the modified Ames test assay, most animal carcinogens were found to be mutagenic. However, bacterial mutagenicity was not viewed as a consistent indicator of mammalian mutagenicity. Determining the mutagenicity of a substance was considered important not only because of mutagenic effects, but also because of the link between mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Several mutagenicity tests were reviewed, such as tests which used human peripheral lymphocyte cells as the substrate. Other pertinent issues to mutagenicity tests, such as confounding, choice of the referent group, and utility in large scale screening programs, were also addressed. The author concludes that further study of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity is crucial, since many workers are exposed to thousands of unevaluated chemicals. More epidemiological studies are also needed to better classify the substances currently listed as possible and probable carcinogens.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving the CDC website.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website.
For more information on CDC's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
CDC.gov Privacy Settings
We take your privacy seriously. You can review and change the way we collect information below.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
Cookies used to make website functionality more relevant to you. These cookies perform functions like remembering presentation options or choices and, in some cases, delivery of web content that based on self-identified area of interests.
Cookies used to track the effectiveness of CDC public health campaigns through clickthrough data.
Cookies used to enable you to share pages and content that you find interesting on CDC.gov through third party social networking and other websites. These cookies may also be used for advertising purposes by these third parties.
Thank you for taking the time to confirm your preferences. If you need to go back and make any changes, you can always do so by going to our Privacy Policy page.