A reanalysis of data obtained in a cross sectional study of the effectiveness of environmental design in deterring robberies of Florida convenience stores was performed. Data obtained in a study of 110 convenience stores that have been robbed between 1984 and 1986 were reviewed. The stores had been visited in 1987 and their environmental designs evaluated. For the reanalysis, the stores were classified into high and low robbery groups. Each store was evaluated according to 14 environmental design factors and five crime risk factors, which included environmental design factors related to store location such as light traffic on an adjacent street and proximity to a major street, the inside and physical characteristics of the store, and store policies. Examples of physical store factors were poor exterior lighting and the opportunity for concealed access or escape routes. The store policy factors involved cash handling policies, number of clerks, and hours of operation. The local crime factors included a high county crime rate, being located in a large county, having few sworn law enforcement officers, having a clearance rate of less than 25%, and being located within a municipal jurisdiction. Associations between environmental design and crime risk factors and the store robbery rates were analyzed. Having a concealed access or escape route, cash register at the back or side of the store, high county crime rate, and a large county population were significantly associated with an increased risk of being robbed, odds ratios (ORs) 9.5, 6.2, 6.3, and 2.8, respectively. Poor cash handling policies were significantly associated with a decreased robbery rate, OR 0.1. A logistic model incorporating all of the factors agreed well with the actual robbery data; the model correctly classified the identified robbery rate of 26% in 70% of the stores. Some confounding was indicated when local crime factors were removed from the model. The authors conclude that studies of the effectiveness of environmental designs for deterring robbery must take into account local crime risk factors.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving the CDC website.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website.
For more information on CDC's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
CDC.gov Privacy Settings
We take your privacy seriously. You can review and change the way we collect information below.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
Cookies used to make website functionality more relevant to you. These cookies perform functions like remembering presentation options or choices and, in some cases, delivery of web content that based on self-identified area of interests.
Cookies used to track the effectiveness of CDC public health campaigns through clickthrough data.
Cookies used to enable you to share pages and content that you find interesting on CDC.gov through third party social networking and other websites. These cookies may also be used for advertising purposes by these third parties.
Thank you for taking the time to confirm your preferences. If you need to go back and make any changes, you can always do so by going to our Privacy Policy page.