Discrepancies in two studies of cancer mortality among nuclear workers at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard were investigated. Lists of subjects from a 1978 proportional mortality study and a 1981 NIOSH cohort study were compared. The cohort was composed of workers monitored for radiation exposure. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) (compared to the United States population) and age adjusted proportional mortality ratios (PMRs) of workers appearing on both lists for whom cause of death information was available were determined. The effect of selection bias was assessed by comparing cancer PMRs for nuclear and non nuclear workers enrolled in the initial study with those whose next of kin had been contacted. Effects of measurement bias were assessed by examining cancer PMRs for nuclear and non nuclear workers classified correctly and incorrectly by next of kin. For nuclear workers, calculations of SMRs showed a small deficit in cancer mortality (SMR 90) and a relatively large deficit in all cause mortality (SMR 75). For all workers both cancer and all cause mortality SMRs were very close to 1.0. Thus the cancer PMR for nuclear workers was about 20 percent higher because of their low all cause mortality. For all workers identified in the original PMR study, the PMRs for cancer were 0.268 in nuclear and 0.198 in non nuclear workers. For workers whose next of kin had been contacted, PMRs were 0.207 in non nuclear and 0.282 in nuclear workers. Misclassification of exposure status resulting in measurement bias was also found, due to inaccurate information from next of kin regarding work exposure histories of nuclear workers dying from cancer. The authors conclude that discrepancies between these two studies result largely from the healthy worker effect and measurement bias, the latter being the more substantial effect. Bias occurring in the selection of subjects for the initial study accounts for a smaller portion of the discrepancies.
Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving the CDC website.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website.
For more information on CDC's web notification policies, see Website Disclaimers.
CDC.gov Privacy Settings
We take your privacy seriously. You can review and change the way we collect information below.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
Cookies used to make website functionality more relevant to you. These cookies perform functions like remembering presentation options or choices and, in some cases, delivery of web content that based on self-identified area of interests.
Cookies used to track the effectiveness of CDC public health campaigns through clickthrough data.
Cookies used to enable you to share pages and content that you find interesting on CDC.gov through third party social networking and other websites. These cookies may also be used for advertising purposes by these third parties.
Thank you for taking the time to confirm your preferences. If you need to go back and make any changes, you can always do so by going to our Privacy Policy page.