Supervisor for a Drywall Contractor Was Fatally Injured When He Fell and Became Entangled in the Frame of a Manually Propelled 6-foot Mobile Scaffold.
April 4, 2000
A 31-year-old male supervisor for a drywall contractor died on April 29, 1999, from head injuries he received the previous day in a fall from a 6-foot mobile scaffold. At the time of the incident, the victim was part of a two-man crew installing drywall inside an addition to a hospital. The supervisor was working from the scaffold installing drywall on the top section of the room when he suddenly fell. The scaffold was not fully planked and its wheels were not locked. The exact circumstances of the fall are unclear since the activities of the supervisor immediately preceding the fall were not witnessed. The co-worker heard a sound, looked over, and saw the victim and the scaffold hit the floor. He immediately went to obtain assistance. A physician working nearby responded within two minutes. Emergency room staff transported the victim to the emergency room within ten minutes. The worker was hospitalized and died the following day from his injuries.
FACE investigators concluded that, to help prevent similar occurrences, employers should:
- ensure that scaffolds are fully planked and that scaffold casters and wheels are locked to prevent movement of the scaffold;
- ensure that the scaffolding selected is appropriate for the work being performed; and
- develop, implement, and enforce work procedures and provide adequate training for mobile scaffold users.
A 31-year-old male supervisor for a drywall contractor died on April 29, 1999 from head injuries he received the previous day in a fall from a 6-foot mobile scaffold. OKFACE investigators were notified of the incident and a site visit was conducted on June 28, 1999. The FACE investigator obtained the OSHA citations, hospital records, and the death certificate. The owner of the drywall contracting company was interviewed. Construction at the site of the incident had been concluded and a visit to the site was not feasible. The worker who was in the room with the victim at the time of the incident had not returned to work subsequent to the incident and was not available for interview at the time of the investigation.
The employer was a small construction contractor whose primary business was drywall installation. The company had been in business for about 12 years and employed 16 people at the time of the incident. Fourteen employees worked in the field as drywall installers or laborers. The victim was a nephew of the owner and had worked for the company for approximately six years. He had worked as a supervisor and drywall installer for approximately three years. The employer did not have a formal safety program. Earlier in the year, the owner had initiated weekly safety meetings based on a curriculum provided by a subscription service. Scaffold safety had not been taught as a topic prior to the time of the incident. There had been no other fatalities in the company’s history.
The contractor had assigned four workers to install drywall in a hospital construction project on April 28, 1999. The crew was working in two-person teams in separate rooms that afternoon. The 31-year old supervisor and laborer were installing drywall 10-12 feet above floor level. The room they were working in was approximately 2500 square feet and had an angular ceiling that measured approximately 16 feet at its apex. The floor was level and clean. The drywall was stacked approximately 15 to 20 feet from the point where it was being installed. The supervisor was wearing work clothes, a nail bag, and leather work boots. He was using a cordless drill and reaching up to install drywall.
The supervisor was working from a mobile scaffold which was approximately 6 feet high, 29½ inches wide, and 6 feet 1½ inches long. It had been purchased approximately 6 months earlier and reportedly was in excellent condition. The scaffold was equipped with four locking wheels. The wheels were not locked at the time of the incident. The mobile scaffold had an aluminum scaffold board measuring 6 feet 9 inches long, 19½ inches wide, and 2½ inches thick. This aluminum scaffold board was used in place of the wooden scaffold board that had been purchased with the scaffold. The aluminum scaffold board was too narrow; it was only 19½ inches wide while the scaffold was 29½ inches wide. The aluminum scaffold board was also too long and therefore could not be secured in place. The scaffold was not equipped with a guardrail.
The supervisor positioned the scaffold approximately 2 to 3 inches away from and parallel to the wall to install the next panel and took measurements for the laborer to cut the next panel to size. He communicated the measurements to the laborer, descended from the scaffold, and briefly left the room. When he returned, the supervisor ascended the scaffold to continue securing drywall on the top section of the room while the laborer made the necessary cuts in the next panel. The laborer heard a noise and turned to see the scaffold toppling and the supervisor falling to the concrete floor. As the scaffold toppled, the victim fell and became entangled in the frame of the scaffold. Although the laborer was present and working approximately 10 to 15 feet from the point of the incident, he did not see the victim’s activities that immediately preceded the incident. Earlier in the day, a 6-foot fiberglass ladder had been on the top of the scaffold platform enabling the supervisor to reach the top section of the drywall. It was reported that at the time of the incident, the ladder was not on the scaffold; however, the victim may have been standing on the top pins of the scaffold in order to reach higher (see photograph at end of the report). Medical assistance was provided within two minutes of the incident by a physician who was working nearby. The worker was hospitalized and died the following day from his injuries.
CAUSE OF DEATH
The death certificate listed multiple trauma as the cause of death.
Recommendation #1: Employers should ensure that scaffolds are fully planked and that scaffold casters and wheels are locked to prevent movement of the scaffold.
Discussion: The aluminum scaffold board used as a working platform on the scaffold was not designed for the scaffold frame. It was too narrow and therefore the scaffold was not fully planked. This is important because it provided a gap for the worker to step through and made the scaffold less stable. The aluminum scaffold board was also too long and could not be secured to the scaffold frame. Employers should always use component parts that the scaffold manufacturer recommends. Additionally, the wheels were not locked, adding to the instability of the scaffold. Had the scaffold been properly assembled and used according to the manufacturer’s directions, this incident may have been prevented.
Recommendation #2: Employers should ensure that the scaffolding selected is appropriate for the work being performed.
Discussion: According to OSHA, the victim had earlier been working from a 6-foot fiberglass ladder that had been placed on the working surface of the mobile scaffold. Additionally, it was reported that the worker may have stood on the pins of the scaffold to reach higher. This would support the impression that the scaffold height was not sufficient for the work being performed. The employer should provide a scaffold that is of sufficient height and adequately designed for safe performance of work tasks.
Recommendation #3: Develop, implement, and enforce work procedures and provide adequate training for mobile scaffold users.
Discussion: The first step in ensuring that employees follow safe work practices in the performance of their work is the development of safe work procedures and instructions and training on these procedures. OSHA regulations require the employer to provide training for all employees who work on scaffolds; this training is to be provided by a competent person.
29 CFR 1926.451 General Requirements
29 CFR 1926.452 Additional Requirements Applicable to Specific Types of Scaffolds
29 CFR 1926.454 Training Requirements
Figure 1. Scaffold Position in the Room Where the Victim
was Working at the Time of the Fall
The Oklahoma Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (OKFACE) is an occupational fatality surveillance project to determine the epidemiology of all fatal work-related injuries and identify and recommend prevention strategies. FACE is a research program of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Division of Safety Research.
These fatality investigations serve to prevent fatal work-related injuries in the future by studying the work environment, the worker, the task the worker was performing, the tools the worker was using, the energy exchange resulting in injury, and the role of management in controlling how these factors interact.
To contact Oklahoma State FACE program personnel regarding State-based FACE reports, please use information listed on the Contact Sheet on the NIOSH FACE web site Please contact In-house FACE program personnel regarding In-house FACE reports and to gain assistance when State-FACE program personnel cannot be reached.
Back to NIOSH FACE Web