EGAPP: Informing the effective integration of genomics into health practice—Lynch syndrome
This web page is archived for historical purposes and is no longer being maintained or updated.
Public health issue:
Lynch syndrome (LS)External is the most common cause of inherited colorectal cancer (CRC). LS accounts for about 4,200 new cases of CRC per year (based on 2007 statistics). People with LS have a lifetime colorectal cancer risk of 54-74% in males and 30-52% in females. People with LS are at significantly increased risk for additional cancers, including second primary colon cancer and endometrial cancer in women (40-60%). For each case of LS identified, about half of the person’s first-degree relatives (parents, siblings and children) will also be at increased risk of cancer due to LS and could benefit from enhanced CRC surveillance. Screening colonoscopy at 1-3 year intervals among people with LS can reduce the incidence of CRC by about 60%. The relatives who do not have LS could benefit from knowing that they are not at increased risk as compared to the general population. LS may affect as many as 800,000 people in the U.S., and an estimated 98% of these people may be undiagnosedExternal.
In 2009, the EGAPP Working Group issued an evidence-based recommendation that genetic testing for LS be offered to all persons with newly diagnosed CRC to benefit their at-risk relatives identified through cascade screening. Several different genetic testing strategies are available for Lynch syndrome, including screening of cancer tissue and/or diagnostic testing of DNA from normal tissue. Implementation of this recommendation is a unique opportunity to prevent CRC, through increased surveillance where indicated, in thousands of people. Furthermore, an analysis conducted in 2009External found that this cascading approach is cost effective – being at least comparable with other preventive services.
At the time that the EGAPP recommendation was issued, there were no evidence-based recommendations for universal screening for LS among newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases. The NCCN LS screening guidelinesCdc-pdfExternal use the revised Bethesda/Amsterdam criteria, although the current version acknowledges the EGAPP recommendation, noting that an infrastructure needs to be in place to handle the screening results. Some cancer institutions were beginning to implement universal screening for LS among all newly diagnosed colorectal cancer cases as early as 2006. In 2010, the Michigan Department of Community Health conducted surveillance to explore health plan coverage for LS testing finding no Michigan health plan coverage consistent with the EGAPP recommendation.
In September 2010, CDC convened a multidisciplinary workingExternal group to explore issues surrounding implementation of the EGAPP recommendation. In September 2011, with CDC support, the Lynch Syndrome Screening Network (LSSN)External was formed with the goal of reducing the cancer burden associated with LS. The LSSN facilitates implementation of universal LS screening by promoting sharing of resources, protocols, and data. Of the 91 current LSSN member institutions, 37 have universal screening protocols for LS that are consistent with the EGAPP recommendation, and 43 are willing to share data with the LSSN database. When the 91 LSSN member institutions were asked how the EGAPP recommendation influenced their LS screening protocol:
12 responded that they altered existing criteria for screening from a subset of CRCs to all CRCs.
- 28 responded that the recommendation provided a basis for initiating a LS screening protocol.
- 30 responded that the recommendation is being used to justify developing a LS screening protocol.
- 24 responded that the recommendation supported/justified existing screening protocols.
Some major health plans, including selected Blue Cross Blue Shield licensees that serve states such as Mississippi, Montana, Delaware, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, and selected counties in Washington, are now basing policies for LS testing coverage on the EGAPP recommendation statement.