Skip Navigation Links
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 CDC Home Search Health Topics A-Z

Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice and Policy

View Current Issue
Issue Archive
Archivo de números en español








Emerging Infectious Diseases Journal
MMWR


 Home 

Volume 7: No. 6, November 2010

SPECIAL TOPIC
Improving Public Health System Performance Through Multi-Organizational Partnerships

Type of Partnership Configuration (Breadth/Density/Centrality) Prevalence, % (95% CI)
1998 2006
Comprehensive
Cluster 1 (High/High/Moderate) 13 (9-17) 21 (16-27)
Cluster 2 (High/High/Low) 5 (2-8) 3 (1-6)
Cluster 3 (High/Low/High) 6 (3-9) 12 (8-16)
Conventional
Cluster 4 (Moderate/Moderate/High) 3 (1-5) 3 (1-5)
Cluster 5 (Moderate/Moderate/Low) 45 (39-52) 31 (25-37)
Limited
Cluster 6 (Low/Low/High) 14 (9-18) 18 (13-23)
Cluster 7 (Low/Moderate/Low) 14 (9-18) 11 (7-15)

Figure. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 7 public health partnership configurations, 1998 and 2006. Data were obtained from a survey of the 351 agencies that responded in both years (29,30). Seven configurations were identified through multivariate cluster analysis, each one distinguished by network breadth, density, and centrality. Breadth represents the array of actors involved in the partnerships; density represents the amount of interconnectedness between organizations; and centrality represents the relative influence of a single organization within a partnership.

Return to article

 




 



The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


 Home 

Privacy Policy | Accessibility

CDC Home | Search | Health Topics A-Z

This page last reviewed March 22, 2013

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
 HHS logoUnited States Department of
Health and Human Services