|
|
Factors Affecting
Dermal Absorption of Vapours
Kate Jones, Health Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, UK (Corresponding Author)
John Cocker, Health Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, UK
Lisa Dodd, Health Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, UK
Isla Fraser, Health Safety Executive, Liverpool, UK
Martin Roff, Health Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, UK
Introduction
We have previously reported (Brooke et al, 1998) that solvent vapours
can be absorbed through the skin and that the extent varies markedly and
depends on the chemical. For some chemicals, the extent of absorption
is significant e.g. for 1-methoxy-2-propanol dermal absorption accounts
for up to 14% of the total absorbed dose after 8h exposure at the Occupational
Exposure Standard. Other studies have shown that increased temperature
(Vanakoski et al, 1996) and increased humidity (Meuling et al, 1997) can
increase dermal absorption and that these conditions can cause physiological
changes in the skin barrier function (Schafer et al, 2002).
We have conducted a second
study using 2-butoxyethanol to investigate the influence of temperature,
humidity and clothing on the dermal absorption of vapours. As for the
first study, the extent of dermal absorption was determined by biological
monitoring to measure the resultant body burden of the chemical.
Methods
Four volunteers were exposed on nine occasions. For eight of these exposures
they wore air-fed half-masks to supply clean air for the inhalation route.
The baseline conditions (one whole body and one
skin only exposure) were 25oC, 40% relative humidity with
volunteers wearing shorts and T-shirt. For each subsequent exposure, a
single parameter was changed: humidity (60%, 65%), temperature (20oC,
30oC) or clothing (minimal, Tyvek overalls). Finally, a 'industrial scenario'
was conducted where volunteers wore overalls over their shorts and T-shirts
and environmental conditions reflected high temperature and high humidity
(30oC, 60%), such as might be encountered in a tank-cleaning operation
or similar.
Body burden in each of the
exposures was determined by the measurement of butoxyacetic acid excreted
in urine after exposure. Total butoxyacetic acid was measured
after acid hydrolysis of any conjugated butoxyacetic acid, followed by
derivatisation (using pentafluorobenzyl bromide) and analysis by GC-MS.
Results
Results show that baseline dermal absorption of 2-butoxyethanol
vapour was, on average, 11% of the total absorbed dose. Higher temperature
(30oC, mean 14%, p=0.03) and greater humidity (65% RH, mean 13%, p=0.1)
increased dermal absorption. The wearing of whole-body overalls did not
attenuate absorption (mean 10%). By combining several factors together
in the industrial scenario, dermal absorption of vapours was
significantly increased (p<0.005) with a mean of 39% of the total absorbed
dose.
Figure 1. Mean and ranges (N=4) for the % body burden attritubable to
dermal absorption.
Conclusions
The work has shown that dermal absorption of vapours can be significant
and that environmental conditions can affect the absorption. This is likely
to be due to increased surface blood flow (as purported by Vanakoski et
al, 1996), increased skn hydration (as observed by Schafer et al, 2002)
and perspiration (aiding dissolution of 2-butoxyethanol, forming a solution
on the surface of the skin) and opening of skin pores under conditions
of increased temperature and/or humidity.
Some types of protective clothing
may not be suitable to reduce absorption and may encourage a high humidity
microclimate between the skin and the overall exacerbating dermal absorption.
The possibility of significant absorption of vapours through the skin
should be considered, particularly for workers in high vapour concentration
conditions where control of exposure relies on respiratory protection.
References
Brooke I, Cocker J, Delic JI, Payne M, Jones K, Gregg NC, Dyne D (2002)
Dermal uptake of solvents from the vapour phase: an experimental study
in humans, Ann Occup Hyg. 42(8):531-40.
Meuling WJ, Franssen AC, Brouwer DH, van Hemmen JJ (1997) The influence
of skin moisture on the dermal absorption of propoxur in human volunteers:
a consideration for biological monitoring practices, Sci. Total Environ.
199(1-2):165-72.
Schafer P, Bewick-Sonntag C, Capri MG, Berardesca E (2002) Physiological
changes in skin barrier function in relation to occlusion level, exposure
time and climatic conditions, Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol. 15(1):7-19.
Vanakoski J, Seppala T, Sievi E, Lunell, E (1996) Exposure to high ambient
temperature increases absorption and plasma concentrations of transdermal
nicotine, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 60(3):308-15.
|