NOTE: This page is archived for historical purposes and is no longer being maintained or updated.

D4.1 Traumatic Occupational Injury Fatalities to Fire Service Personnel, 1992-1998-Ta ML, Fosbroke DE

Firefighting tasks are performed in varied and dangerous environments posing unique hazards for increased risk of injury and death. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (CFOI) and the National Fire Protection Association's (NFPA) annual firefighter fatality reports were analyzed to characterize the pattern and quantify the risk of traumatic occupational fatalities among workers in the fire service. Analysis was limited to civilian firefighting and fire inspection/prevention occupations, including supervisors. Denominator data for rate calculations were derived from the Current Population Survey and the NFPA's Fire Department Survey.

From 1992-98 CFOI documented 280 fatal traumatic occupational injuries to fire service workers, a majority (90.4%) of which occurred among firefighters. During this 7-year period, the average fatality rate was 9.0 per 100,000 employed career fire service workers, compared with 4.9 per 100,000 for all workers. Among volunteers, the fatality rate was 3.5 per 100,000.

Fires/explosions and transportation incidents were the main injury events. Fatalities from fire/explosion events predominately resulted from: collapsing structures (25.0%), entrapment (23.2%), and smoke inhalation (17.9%). Leading fatal transportation events were distributed among highway (60.6%), pedestrian (20.2% ), and non-highway (7.3% ) incidents. Motorized highway vehicles were the major injury source, accounting for 36.4% of all fatalities. Second to firefighting, activities involving vehicular and transportation operations were the next most hazardous worker activity. Over half (53.3%) of all transportation-related fatal injury events occurred among volunteers. Compared to those who work for pay or compensation, volunteers had 2.5 times the odds of being fatally injured in transportation than fire/explosion events.

Vehicle and transportation operations were a prominent cause of traumatic fatal occupational injury, especially among volunteers. While fatality data support the need to focus firefighter training on fire suppression activities, reduction of firefighter fatalities also require training to address motor vehicle hazards.

 

D4.2 The Relation Between Age & Duty-Related Injuries in Urban Fire Fighters I-Beaton R, Johnson C, Salazar M, Murphy S

Urban firefighters perform a variety of labor-intensive duties and tasks including fire suppression, rendering emergency medical services, and extrication/rescue. In 1997, the annual incidence of duty-related injuries in U.S. firefighters ( 40%) was nearly six times the average reported by other private sector U.S. worker groups.

The purpose of this investigation was to identify risks associated with firefighter age as well as protective factors for duty-related injuries employing a cross-sectional analysis of survey data obtained from two U.S. metropolitan fire departments. In a NIOSH surveillance study firefighter participants were asked to report if they had "been physically injured in the line of duty within the past year," and whether they were "still experiencing the after effects of this injury." Participants also reported the type of line-of-duty injury experienced.

Sample(s): Participants who completed surveys between 1995-1997 from their respective departments (n=382 and n=158) comprised the total firefighter sample (N=540). Approximately 90% of the potential respondents from each department participated. The average age of the total participant sample was 38 y.o., with an average of 11.25 years of service.

Analyses, Results, & Conclusions: Respondent data were analyzed by decade-age cohorts consisting of firefighters in their 20's (n=95), 30's (n=207), 40's (n=188), and 50's (n=47). In the older cohorts, there was significant increase in both the percentage of firefighters reporting duty-related injury (2=12.37; df=3; P<.01) and in the percentage reporting the "after-effects" of their duty-related injury (2=36.14; df=3; P<.001). The most commonly reported injuries were musculoskeletal.

In a series of logistical regression equations, firefighter age and department were shown to correctly categorize "on-the-job" injuries in 67.7% of cases. However, neither rank, gender, nor any reported health habit improved predictions of duty-related injury status. Explanations of these findings and implications for firefighter training and policy formulation are considered.

 

D4.3 A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Duty Related Injuries in Urban Fire Fighters-Johnson CL, Beaton R, Lewis E, Ollis T

Urban firefighters, by virtue of the often dangerous and labor-intensive emergency duties they perform, have an annual incidence of on the job injuries that is nearly six times the average reported by other private sector U.S. worker groups (IAFF, 1997). Exploring longitudinal data obtained from two U.S. metropolitan fire departments, the purpose of this investigation was to identify variables (both risk and protective factors) which might predict future duty related injury status (Injured: Yes/No).

Methods and Sample: In a NIOSH surveillance study firefighter participants from two urban fire departments were asked to report if they had "been physically injured in the line of duty within the past year." Survey data were then collected from the firefighter participants every six months for the next 18 months. Subjects who were uninjured at baseline were selected for analysis (n= 185) and classified with regard to a subsequent job-related injury in the 18 month follow up period (Subsequent Injury: Yes/No). Baseline measures of demographics as well as symptoms and sources of stress were examined as potential variables predictive of future on the job injury.

Findings and Conclusions: Results identified self reported symptoms of stress (SOS Total score) (r=0.22 p<0.01), reported concerns about potential "reductions in force, wages and benefits" (r=0.22 p<0.01), and "conveying news of tragedy" (r=0.21 p<0.01) as the most powerful predictors of future duty related injury in this sample. However, neither participant age, rank, nor any other demographic variable were significant predictors of future injury. Explanations and limitations of these findings as well as of implications for firefighter policy and training are considered.

 

D4.4 Fire Fighter Fatality Reports and Their Importance to the Volunteer Fire Service-Schafer HS

The National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC) participated in a workshop to determine the level of detail, content and distribution of the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) Fire Firefighter Fatality Investigation and Prevention Program.

The purpose of the program is to determine factors that cause or contribute to firefighter deaths suffered in the line of duty. The outcome of the reports are distributed in many ways including mailings to the major fire service organizations and postings on the NIOSH website.

The reports are beneficial to the volunteer fire service for a variety of reasons. These include prevention of firefighter death and injury. The NVFC has used the informative reports to educate the volunteer fire service through its newsletter and website. Oftentimes, the recommendations made require additional funding for equipment, training, etc. The NVFC educates members of Congress through the reports as well.

Most recently, a report identified that if firefighters involved in a wildland fire had had more equipment, lives may have been saved. This type of equipment is made available to volunteer firefighters through the Volunteer Fire Assistance program. This program is woefully underfunded and receives $24 million in annual requests when less than $3 million is awarded. If proper funding were in place, firefighters lives may be saved.

 

    

 

NOIRS 2000 Menu Page
NOIRS Home
 
 
NIOSH home page  CDC home page  NORA Traumatic Injury home page 
NIOSH - National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health CDC - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention NORA - National Occupational Research Agenda
 
Page last updated: March 2001
Page last reviewed: March 2001
Content Source: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Division of Safety Research