Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Simulated effects of head movement on contact pressures between headforms and N95 filtering facepiece respirators part 2: simulation.

Lei-Z; Ji-X; Li-N; Yang-J; Zhuang-Z; Rottach-D
Ann Occup Hyg 2014 Sep; 58(9):1186-1199
Finite element (FE) filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) were developed and mated to the new headforms with a cervical spine model. The FFRs from three manufacturers included three sizing systems: (i) a single one-size-fits all, (ii) an FFR with two sizes (S/M and M/L), and (iii) an FFR with three sizes (S, L/M, XL). Finite element method (FEM) simulations of 16 headform and respirator combinations (5 headforms and 6 respirators) were used to examine maximum contact pressure changes for five cases: static head, flexion, extension, left rotation, and right rotation. For each of the 16 headform and respirator combinations, maximum contact pressures of the static headform and motile headforms were compared using t-tests. Significant differences on the maximum contact pressures were found in the extension, left rotation and right rotation at the nose (P < 0.005), the left rotation at the top of right cheek (P = 0.03), and the extension at the bottom of left/right cheek (P = 0.01). When separately considering each headform and each FFR manufacturer, the effects of the four head movement cases on the nose maximum contact pressure changes were observed in the simulations with all five headforms and all FFR manufacturers. The effects of the left and right rotations on the chin maximum contact pressure changes were observed in the simulations with the small headform. It was also found that the use of a nose clip could reduce the impact of the head left/ right rotations on nose maximum contact pressure changes. In addition, head movements changed pressure contours of the key nose area. Caused by the head movements, the maximum contact pressure changes may affect seal quality, and the increase of the maximum contact pressures could reduce the facial comfort level.
Simulation-methods; Respirators; Respiratory-equipment; Personal-protective-equipment; Face-masks; Air-purifying-respirators; Anthropometry; Headgear; Testing-equipment; Equipment-reliability; Biomechanical-modeling; Biomechanics; Motion-studies; Analytical-models; Pressure-testing; Materials-testing; Equipment-design; Author Keywords: finite element simulation; head movement; respirator contact pressure
James Yang, Human-Centric Design Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
Publication Date
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
Funding Type
Fiscal Year
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Contract-254-2009-M-31878; Contract-254-2010-M-36735; Contract-254-2012-M-52258; M092014
Issue of Publication
NIOSH Division
Priority Area
Healthcare and Social Assistance
Source Name
Annals of Occupational Hygiene