Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Health hazard evaluation report: evaluation of employee exposures during sea lamprey pesticide application.

Authors
Ceballos-DM; Musolin-K; Beaucham-CC
Source
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, HETA 2011-0099-3211, 2014 May; :1-31
NIOSHTIC No.
20044432
Abstract
The Health Hazard Evaluation Program received a request from a health and safety manager at a government agency concerned with potential exposures when employees manually applied pesticides into rivers to control sea lamprey larvae. Sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus) are parasitic fish in the Great Lakes, the Finger Lakes, and Lake Champlain. In a typical treatment year, 30 to 40 U.S. tributaries receive applications of 3-trifluoro-methyl-4-nitro-phenol (TFM) and Bayluscide(TM). In 2012, an estimated 56,000 kilograms of TFM and 1,000 kilograms of Bayluscide were applied. During our evaluation, we (1) observed employee work practices and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when applying pesticides; (2) looked at health and safety records and documents; (3) asked employees about their work, use of PPE, and work-related health and safety concerns; (4) measured TFM and Bayluscide on work surfaces, work clothing, exposed skin, and glove liners worn under protective gloves; and (5) measured carbon monoxide in a portable laboratory and a portable workstation powered by a propane generator. We found pesticides on work surfaces, PPE, personal clothing, and skin of employees, and a high carbon monoxide reading in a portable workstation. We observed inconsistent and inappropriate reuse of PPE, inconsistent hand washing methods, and some worksites where clean water was not available. We saw employees transfer, handle, and mix pesticides in open containers, which could lead to spills and tracking pesticides out of the work area. During our interviews, employees indicated that they were generally aware of pesticide exposure routes and health risks from exposure, and they wore eye protection and chemical resistant gloves when mixing and applying pesticides. Fewer than five employees reported skin irritation from TFM, skin rash, and poison ivy. We recommended the employer (1) enclose pesticide transfer and mixing equipment; (2) install washing stations so that employees can clean their boots, PPE, and skin; (3) develop PPE cleaning and storage procedures; (4) provide employees with clean water; and (5) reroute generator exhaust. We recommended employees (1) use required PPE and clean it before storing or reusing, (2) wash hands and face with clean water and soap after handling pesticides, (3) change clothes when they become contaminated with pesticide and at the end of the work shift, and (4) report all health and safety concerns to your supervisor.
Keywords
Ecological-systems; Pesticides; Water-purification; Employee-exposure; Exposure-assessment; Microorganisms; Environmental-control; Parasiticides; Pesticide-residues; Sampling; Personal-protective-equipment; Protective-clothing; Work-practices; Skin-exposure; Gloves; Propanes; Skin-disorders; Chemical-processing; Exhaust-ventilation; Manual-materials-handling; Hazardous-materials; Author Keywords: Administration of Conservation Programs); pesticides; Bayluscide; TFM; CAS Registry Number: 1420-04-8; CAS Registry Number: 50-65-7; sea lamprey; river application; wipe sampling
CAS No.
1420-04-8; 50-65-7; 630-08-0; 88-30-2
Publication Date
20140501
Document Type
Field Studies; Hazard Evaluation and Technical Assistance
Fiscal Year
2014
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
HETA-2011-0099-3211; M062014
NIOSH Division
DSHEFS
Priority Area
Services
SIC Code
NAICS-924120
Source Name
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
State
OH; MI
TOP