Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Lessons from the World Trade Center disaster: airway disease presenting as restrictive dysfunction.

Authors
Berger-KI; Reibman-J; Oppenheimer-BW; Vlahos-I; Harrison-D; Goldring-RM
Source
Chest 2013 Jul; 144(1):249-257
NIOSHTIC No.
20043106
Abstract
Background: The present study (1) characterizes a physiologic phenotype of restrictive dysfunction due to airway injury and (2) compares this phenotype to the phenotype of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: This is a retrospective study of 54 persistently symptomatic subjects following World Trade Center (WTC) dust exposure. Inclusion criteria were reduced vital capacity (VC), FEV 1 /VC > 77%, and normal chest roentgenogram. Measurements included spirometry, plethysmography, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO ), impulse oscillometry (IOS), inspiratory/expiratory CT scan, and lung compliance (n = 16). Results: VC was reduced (46% to 83% predicted) because of the reduction of expiratory reserve volume (43% +/- 26% predicted) with preservation of inspiratory capacity (IC) (85% +/- 16% predicted). Total lung capacity (TLC) was reduced, confirming restriction (73% +/- 8% predicted); however, elevated residual volume to TLC ratio (0.35 +/- 0.08) suggested air trapping (AT). D(LCO) was reduced (78% +/- 15% predicted) with elevated D(LCO)/alveolar volume (5.3 +/- 0.8 [mL/mm Hg/min]/L). IOS demonstrated abnormalities in resistance and/or reactance in 50 of 54 subjects. CT scan demonstrated bronchial wall thickening and/or AT in 40 of 54 subjects; parenchymal disease was not evident in any subject. Specific compliance at functional residual capacity (FRC) (0.07 +/- 0.02 [L/cm H 2 O]/L) and recoil pressure (Pel ) at TLC (27 +/- 7 cm H2O) were normal. In contrast to patients with ILD, lung expansion was not limited, since IC, Pel, and inspiratory muscle pressure were normal. Reduced TLC was attributable to reduced FRC, compatible with airway closure in the tidal range. Conclusions: This study describes a distinct physiologic phenotype of restriction due to airway dysfunction. This pattern was observed following WTC dust exposure, has been reported in other clinical settings (eg, asthma), and should be incorporated into the definition of restrictive dysfunction.
Keywords
Emergency-response; Emergency-responders; Rescue-workers; Respiratory-system-disorders; Pulmonary-system-disorders; Lung-disorders; Airway-obstruction; Genetic-factors; Dust-exposure; Spirometry; Plethysmography; Analytical-instruments; Oscillography; Physiological-factors; Physiological-function; Lung-function; Airway-resistance
Contact
Kenneth I. Berger, MD, FCCP, New York University School of Medicine, 240 E 38 St, Room M15, New York, NY 10016
CODEN
CHETBF
CAS No.
630-08-0
Publication Date
20130701
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
kenneth.berger@nyumc.org
Funding Type
Grant; Contract
Fiscal Year
2013
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Grant-Number-E11-OH-009630; Contract-200-2011-39413; M082013
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
0012-3692
Source Name
Chest
State
NY
Performing Organization
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
TOP