Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

A decision process for determining whether to conduct responder health research following large disasters.

Authors
Decker-JA; Keifer-M; Reissman-DB; Funk-R; Halpin-J; Bernard-B; Ehrenberg-RL; Schuler-CR; Whelan-E; Myers-K; Howard-J
Source
Am J Disaster Med 2013 Jan/Mar; 8(1):25-33
NIOSHTIC No.
20042607
Abstract
Disasters often set the stage for scientific inquiry within the fieid of occupational safety and health. This is especially true when the long-term consequences of exposures associated with a particular disaster are unclear. However, a responder research study can be costly and difficult to design, and researchers must consider whether the proposed study will produce useful, reliable results and is a prudent public health investment. The decision process can be segregated into various components, including scientific rationale that should be formally recognized as critical to efficiently and effectively determine whether a research study is warranted. The scientific rationale includes certain controlling or "gatekeeper" factors that should be present to proceed with research.
Keywords
Disaster-planning; Rescue-workers; Rescue-measures; Exposure-levels; Risk-factors; Public-health; Surveillance-programs; Health-hazards; Health-protection; Monitoring-systems; Author Keywords: disaster research; responder research; postdisaster research; surveillance; health monitoring
Publication Date
20130101
Document Type
Journal Article
Fiscal Year
2013
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
B20130531
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
1932-149X
NIOSH Division
WSO; DSHEFS; DRDS
Source Name
American Journal of Disaster Medicine
State
GA; CO; DC; OH; WV
TOP