Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

The contribution of occupational risks to the global burden of disease: summary and next steps.

Authors
Fingerhut-M; Nelson-DI; Driscoll-T; Concha-Barrientos-M; Steenland-K; Punnett-L; Pruss-Ustun-A; Leigh-J; Corvalan-C; Eijkemans-G; Takala-J
Source
Med Lav 2006 Mar-Apr; 97(2):313-321
NIOSHTIC No.
20041881
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Comparative Risk Assessment (CRA) project of the World Health Organization (WHO) assessed worldwide mortality and morbidity in the year 2000 resulting from exposures to selected occupational hazards. This article summarizes findings of the WHO CRA project, presents the estimates of the International Labor Organization (ILO) for total deaths due to workplace risks, and calls for action. OBJECTIVES: Global burden estimates and counts of deaths assist ministers and other decision and policy makers to make informed decisions and to take action regarding risk reduction. METHODS: The WHO CRA methodology combined the proportions of the population exposed to five occupational hazards (excluding numerous risks due to inadequate global data) with relative risk measures to estimate attributable fractions of the selected health outcomes for both morbidity and mortality. ILO estimates of total numbers of global work-related injury deaths apply national fatality rates to employment data for the particular country; for disease deaths ILO uses an attributable risk approach. RESULTS: In 2000, the selected occupational risk factors were responsible worldwide for 37% of back pain, 16% of hearing loss, 13% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 11% of asthma, 8% of injuries, 9% of lung cancer and 2% of leukemia, and about 100% of pneumoconioses and mesothelioma. These selected risks at work resulted in the loss of about 24 million years of healthy life and caused 850,000 deaths worldwide, about 40% of the ILO estimate of 2.2 million total deaths. CONCLUSIONS: These global and regional analyses have identified areas where specific preventive actions are required.
Keywords
Occupational-diseases; Diseases; Risk-factors; Risk-analysis; Mortality-data; Mortality-rates; Occupational-hazards; Occupational-health; Morbidity-rates; Surveillance-programs; Decision-making; Back-injuries; Hearing-loss; Pulmonary-system-disorders; Bronchial-asthma; Lung-cancer; Injuries; Silicosis; Asbestosis; Pneumoconiosis; Carcinogens; Mesothelial-cells; Lifespan; Injury-prevention; Disease-prevention; Author Keywords: Occupational risk; global burden of disease
Contact
Marilyn Fingerhut, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Room 715H, Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, USA
CODEN
MELAAD
Publication Date
20060301
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
mfingerhut@cdc.gov
Fiscal Year
2006
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
2
ISSN
0025-7818
NIOSH Division
OD; DSHEFS
Source Name
La Medicina del Lavoro
State
DC; OH; CO; MA; GA
TOP