Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Solid versus liquid particle sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers when facing the wind.

Authors
Koehler-KA; Anthony-TR; Van Dyke-M; Volckens-J
Source
Ann Occup Hyg 2012 Mar; 56(2):194-206
NIOSHTIC No.
20040771
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the facing-the-wind sampling efficiency of three personal aerosol samplers as a function of particle phase (solid versus liquid). Samplers examined were the IOM, Button, and a prototype personal high-flow inhalable sampler head (PHISH). The prototype PHISH was designed to interface with the 37-mm closed-face cassette and provide an inhalable sample at 10 l min(-1) of flow. Increased flow rate increases the amount of mass collected during a typical work shift and helps to ensure that limits of detection are met, particularly for well-controlled but highly toxic species. Two PHISH prototypes were tested: one with a screened inlet and one with a single-pore open-face inlet. Personal aerosol samplers were tested on a bluff-body disc that was rotated along the facing-the-wind axis to reduce spatiotemporal variability associated with sampling supermicron aerosol in low-velocity wind tunnels. When compared to published data for facing-wind aspiration efficiency for a mouth-breathing mannequin, the IOM oversampled relative to mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency for all sizes and particle types (solid and liquid). The sampling efficiency of the Button sampler was closer to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency than the IOM for solid particles, but the screened inlet removed most liquid particles, resulting in a large underestimation compared to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency. The open-face PHISH results showed overestimation for solid particles and underestimation for liquid particles when compared to the mannequin facing-the-wind aspiration efficiency. Substantial (and statistically significant) differences in sampling efficiency were observed between liquid and solid particles, particularly for the Button and screened-PHISH, with a majority of aerosol mass depositing on the screened inlets of these samplers. Our results suggest that large droplets have low penetration efficiencies through screened inlets and that particle bounce, for solid particles, is an important determinant of aspiration and sampling efficiencies for samplers with screened inlets.
Keywords
Equipment-reliability; Samplers; Sampling-equipment; Inhalants; Performance-capability; Aerosol-sampling; Air-samplers; Air-sampling-equipment; Air-flow; Particle-aerodynamics; Laboratory-testing; Filtration; Air-filters; Air-contamination; Environmental-pollution; Indoor-air-pollution; Exposure-chambers; Exposure-methods; Exposure-assessment; Testing-equipment; Aerosol-particles; Particulate-dust; Exposure-limits; Equipment-design; Gravimetry; Author Keywords: aerosols; dust sampling conventions; exposure assessment; gravimetric analysis; inhalable dust
Contact
John Volckens, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1681, USA
CODEN
AOHYA3
Publication Date
20120301
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
john.volckens@colostate.edu
Funding Type
Grant
Fiscal Year
2012
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Grant-Number-R21-OH-009114; B05222012
Issue of Publication
2
ISSN
0003-4878
Source Name
Annals of Occupational Hygiene
State
CO; IA
Performing Organization
Colorado State University - Fort Collins
TOP