Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Vibration, proprioception, and low back stability.

Authors
Wilson-SE; Ewing-MS; Loudon-JK; Barlow-SM
Source
Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, R03-OH-007995, 2009 Jan; :1-34
Link
NIOSHTIC No.
20038424
Abstract
The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health report "Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors" lists vibration as one of the five physical workplace factors associated with low back disorders with whole body vibration increasing risk from 1.2 to 39.5 times. However, little had been done to examine the effect of vibration on low back neuromotor control. Such neuromotor control can be a factor in stabilization and injury avoidance in the lumbar spine. The goals of this research project were to assess the effects of muscle vibration on low back proprioception (the ability to sense posture) and dynamic response both during and after vibration exposure in order to examine this possible effect as well as to examine the role of sensory elements within the muscle in dynamic low back stabilization. This research investigated this using both a model of dynamic spine motion and an experimental study examining proprioception as a function of muscle vibration. In the model, changes in neuromotor response variables including decreased response gain, increased response threshold and increased response delay were all found to decrease the effective trunk stiffness, increasing the amount of trunk flexion that might be observed and possibly increasing the potential for injury. Experimentally, such an increased trunk flexion was observed both during and after exposure. Subjects were found to have a 16.1% greater torso flexion during exposure to paraspinal muscle vibration. Torso flexion remained significantly increased after vibration exposure relative to before exposure. Subjects were also found to have a 19.5% slower time to peak muscle activity supporting the neuromotor role in this change in dynamic response. For the worker exposed to vibration, this research, as well as additional investigations by our laboratory and others, suggests that vibration may alter dynamic response to vibration. For such workers, dynamic events such as shock exposure in off-road driving or an unstable footing stepping out of a truck may pose a problem. A driver going to unload his or her truck after a day of vibration exposure may find himself or herself unable to appropriately to control trunk motion in the face of unexpected perturbations.
Keywords
Neuromotor-function; Neuromuscular-system; Biomechanics; Biokinetics; Muscle-function; Sensory-motor-system; Vibration-effects; Injury-prevention; Back-injuries; Exposure-assessment; Reflexes; Posture; Truck-drivers; Machine-operators
Publication Date
20090101
Document Type
Final Grant Report
Email Address
sewilson@ku.edu
Funding Amount
70113
Funding Type
Grant
Fiscal Year
2009
NTIS Accession No.
PB2011-107530
NTIS Price
A04
Identifying No.
Grant-Number-R03-OH-007995
NIOSH Division
OEP
Source Name
Vibration, Proprioception, and Low Back Stability
State
KS; OH
Performing Organization
University of Kansas Lawrence
TOP