Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Use of the human monocytic leukemia THP-1 cell line and co-incubation with microsomes to identify and differentiate hapten and prohapten sensitizers.

Authors
Chipinda-I; Ruwona-TB; Templeton-SP; Siegel-PD
Source
Toxicology 2011 Feb; 280(3):135-143
NIOSHTIC No.
20038395
Abstract
Consumer and medical products can contain leachable chemical allergens which can cause skin sensitization. Recent efforts have been directed at the development of non-animal based tests such as in vitro cell activation assays for the identification of skin sensitizers. Prohapten identification by in vitro assays is still problematic due to the lack of prohapten bioactivation. The present study evaluated the effect of hapten and prohapten exposure on cell surface markers expression (CD86, CD54 and CD40) in the human monocytic leukemia, THP-1, cell line. Upregulation of activation and costimulatory markers are key events in the allergic sensitization process and have been reported to serve as indicators of skin sensitization. Cells were exposed to the prohaptens benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA), carvone oxime (COx), cinnamic alcohol (CA) and isoeugenol (IEG) at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10-M for 24 and 48 h. The direct-binding haptens dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), benzoquinone (BQ), hydroxylethyl acrylate (HEA) and benzylbromide (BB) were used as positive controls. Cells were also exposed to the irritants sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sulfanilamide (SFA). Bioactivation of prohaptens was achieved by adding aroclor-induced rat liver microsomes (S9) to the cell cultures. Consistent upregulation of surface expressions of CD86, CD54 (ICAM-1) and CD40 was observed in THP-1 cells treated with direct-acting haptens (+/-S9) or prohapten (+S9). Upregulation of these markers was not observed after exposure to skin irritants or prohaptens in the absence of exogenously added S9. In conclusion, modification of in vitro cell culture assays to include co-incubation with microsomes enhances identification of prohaptens and allows them to be clearly distinguished from direct-binding haptens.
Keywords
Allergens; Allergic-reactions; Bioactivation; Biochemistry; Biomarkers; Cell-biology; Cellular-reactions; Chemical-hypersensitivity; Laboratory-testing; Quantitative-analysis; Skin-exposure; Skin-irritants; Skin-sensitivity; Statistical-analysis; Author Keywords: Skin sensitizer; Prohapten; THP-1 cells; Cell surface marker
Contact
Itai Chipinda, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26505-2888
CODEN
TXCYAC
CAS No.
50-32-8; 100-39-0
Publication Date
20110227
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
IChipinda@cdc.gov
Fiscal Year
2011
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
3
ISSN
0300-483X
NIOSH Division
HELD
Priority Area
Services
Source Name
Toxicology
State
WV
TOP