Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Bystander injury evaluation of children from midwestern agricultural operations.

Williams-QL Jr.; Alexander-BH; Gerberich-SG; Nachreiner-NM; Church-TR; Ryan-A
J Saf Res 2010 Feb; 41(1):31-37
BACKGROUND: With more than a million youth living on agricultural operations, it is important for parents to understand the consequences of bystander injuries that children experience in these environments. We identified the childhood injuries for bystander status and compared the severity of these injuries to the working children in the Regional Rural Injury Study-II (RRIS-II). METHODS: RRIS-II followed 16,546 children ( approximately 85% of eligible) from rural communities in the Midwest for two six-month recall periods in 1999 and 2001. Demographic, injury, and exposure data were collected through comprehensive computer-assisted telephone interviews. Child injuries were cataloged using narrative scenarios into four categories: (a) directly work-related; (b) indirectly work-related; (c) non-working accomplice; and (d) non-working attendant; the latter three all being bystander categories. Poisson regression modeling was used to calculate rates of bystander injuries. Frequencies were used for comparison of severity measures. RESULTS: Among the 463 child injuries (aged <20yrs), 102 were bystander injuries. Of the bystander-related injuries, 14 were identified as indirectly work-related (working bystanders), 27 as non-working accomplice (passengers/tag-alongs), and 60 as non-working attendant (playing on the operation). The overall rate of bystander injuries was 6.4 per 1,000 people, 95% CI (5.0, 8.1). Males, compared with females, had more than twice the injury rate (8.7; 95% CI 6.4-11.8, and 3.9; 95% CI 2.7-5.7, per 1,000 people, respectively). Bystanders in this population had more severe injuries with 4% having life-threatening circumstances; of these, 4% of the accomplices and 2% of the attendants subsequently died. CONCLUSIONS: Children who live or work on agricultural operations are vulnerable to many hazards. Therefore, this study examined child injuries and found a clear difference in the consequences of these injuries between working-related and bystanding-related injuries. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: Unlike occupations such as construction and mining, where laws and organizations have been created for the protection of bystanders, agricultural bystanders have remained unprotected and have had to face the consequent injury and death outcomes. As public health professionals considering these risks, it is necessary that we work to develop more intervention studies and continue to propose suggestive guidelines for child safety in these environments so as to challenge family traditions and possibly spark public policies that will give further protection to this population.
Accident-prevention; Accidents; Age-factors; Agricultural-industry; Agricultural-workers; Agriculture; Behavior-patterns; Children; Education; Epidemiology; Farmers; Injuries; Injury-prevention; Risk-analysis; Risk-factors; Safety-measures; Safety-practices; Statistical-analysis; Training; Work-environment; Author Keywords: Child bystander; Agricultural bystander; Child injury
Quintin L. Williams, University of Illinois at Chicago, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health (MC 922), 2121 West Taylor Street, Chicago, IL 60612-7260
Publication Date
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
Funding Amount
Funding Type
Fiscal Year
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Grant-Number-R01-OH-004270; Grant-Number-T42-OH-008434
Issue of Publication
Priority Area
Work Environment and Workforce: Special Populations
Source Name
Journal of Safety Research
Performing Organization
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota