Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Regulatory parallels to Daubert: stakeholder influence, "sound science," and the delayed adoption of health-protective standards.

Authors
Neff-RA; Goldman-LR
Source
Am J Publ Health 2005 Jul; 95(S1):S81-S91
NIOSHTIC No.
20037836
Abstract
There is broad agreement that regulatory decisions should be based on evidence. But interested parties have used the "sound science" mantle to demand extended research, analysis, and review of evidence for the sole purpose of delaying health-protective regulation. This historical review shows how the forces behind the "sound science" reasoning leading to the Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc decision on science in the courtroom have operated in parallel in environmental regulation.Like Daubert, certain "sound science" regulatory tools can be used to improve decision quality. However, these tools can also challenge the federal government's ability to safeguard the public's health and well-being. Most recently, political tampering with science provides the foundation for some policymakers to disregard science completely in the environmental regulatory process.
Keywords
Risk-factors; Risk-analysis; Public-health; Standards; Regulations
Contact
Lynn R. Goldman, MD, MPH, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Room E6636, Baltimore, MD 21205
CODEN
AJHEAA
Publication Date
20050701
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
lgoldman@jhsph.edu
Funding Type
Grant
Fiscal Year
2005
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Grant-Number-T42-OH-008428
Issue of Publication
S1
ISSN
0090-0036
Source Name
American Journal of Public Health
State
MD
Performing Organization
Johns Hopkins University
TOP