Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Quality of life for men receiving a second treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors
Arredondo-SA; Latini-DM; Sadetsky-N; Kawakami-J; Pasta-DJ; DuChane-J; Carroll-PR; CaPSURE-Investigators
Source
J Urol 2007 Jan; 177(1):273-278
NIOSHTIC No.
20037208
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed the impact of second treatment on health related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. This issue is important because second treatment resulting from prostate specific antigen recurrence has the potential to further negatively impact health related quality of life and affect the overall value of treatment. We compared differences in health related quality of life before and after second treatment for men who had asymptomatic prostate specific antigen recurrence with those who did not have biochemical failure. Materials and Methods: Men in this analysis (897) had localized disease, initially underwent radical prostatectomy monotherapy, and completed at least 1 health related quality of life questionnaire before and after radical prostatectomy. In this cohort 175 men underwent second treatment (nonadjuvant). The Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 and UCLA Prostate Cancer Index were used to measure health related quality of life. Associations between patient groups and time on health related quality of life were analyzed using repeated measures. Results: Men who received a second treatment presented with more severe disease before radical prostatectomy and had worse general health related quality of life. Although health related quality of life differed significantly with time for the 2 groups, most domains for the second treatment group improved or remained stable until 15 months before second treatment, at which point they declined. Scores in the sexual functioning and role-physical domains showed clinically and statistically significant patterns of decreasing with time. Conclusions: Health related quality of life is affected following second treatment but starts to decline approximately 1 year before second treatment. Not all aspects of health related quality of life decreased at the same rate, so patients should be counseled that certain domains may be affected more by additional treatment.
Keywords
Biological-effects; Medical-monitoring; Medical-surveys; Medical-treatment; Men; Physiological-effects; Physiological-measurements; Physiological-response; Prostate-cancer; Qualitative-analysis; Quality-standards; Questionnaires; Statistical-analysis; Surgery; Author Keywords: quality of life; prostatic neoplasms; outcome assessment
Contact
David M. Latini, Houston Center for Quality of Care & Utilization Studies, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (152), 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, Texas 77030
CODEN
JOURAA
Publication Date
20070101
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
latini@bcm.tmc.edu
Funding Type
Grant
Fiscal Year
2007
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Grant-Number-T42-OH-008429
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
0022-5347
Source Name
The Journal of Urology
State
CA; TX; IL
Performing Organization
University of California, Berkeley
TOP