Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Lineman electrocuted when he contacted 7,200-volt power line.

Authors
Anonymous
Source
NIOSH 2009 Jul; :1-9
NIOSHTIC No.
20037046
Abstract
On June 2, 2008, a 47-year-old male journeyman lineman/foreman was electrocuted during the installation of a new 15 KV switch for a single phase, 7,200-volt overhead power line suspended from a wood pole. The decedent was working from an insulated aerial bucket. He had not de-energized the can arrestor fastened to the side of the transformer. He had removed his lineman's gloves prior to removing the first lower bolt of the arrestor. His coworkers believe the can arrestor tipped and the decedent attempted to catch it with his right hand. The current passed through his right hand, across his chest and exited his left hand, which was in contact with a second energized conductor. The decedent yelled to his ground man to lower the bucket. When the bucket was lowered, the decedent was still breathing, but unconscious. The ground man yelled to a two-person journeyman line crew working approximately 200 yards away to come over to help lift the decedent from the bucket. After taking the decedent out of the bucket, the crew began CPR while the ground man called his supervisor for assistance. The supervisor called for emergency response. Arriving six minutes later, the emergency response personnel took over medical care, and then transported him to a local hospital where he was declared dead. Recommendations: 1.) Employers should ensure that linemen follow established safe work procedures to de-energize, ground, and verify the work area is de-energized through testing prior to beginning maintenance and repair operations on power lines. 2.) Employers should ensure that linemen use all appropriate protective equipment, including insulated tools, before attempting any work on power lines with energized circuits. 3.) Employers should conduct both scheduled and unscheduled jobsite safety inspections on a regular basis. 4.) Employers should develop checklists of proper safety procedures and equipment for each job, which could be used to reinforce safe work practices. 5.) Employers should ensure communication devices are operational in all work locations or have alternate methods of communication developed.
Keywords
Region-5; Accident-analysis; Accident-potential; Accident-prevention; Accidents; Electrical-conductivity; Electrical-hazards; Electrical-industry; Electrical-safety; Electrical-workers; Electrocutions; Injuries; Injury-prevention; Occupational-accidents; Occupational-hazards; Occupational-safety-programs; Safety-education; Safety-equipment; Safety-measures; Safety-monitoring; Safety-practices; Safety-programs; Training; Traumatic-injuries; Work-operations; Work-practices; Author Keywords: Electrocution; Lineman; Overhead Power Line
Publication Date
20090731
Document Type
Field Studies; Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation
Funding Type
Cooperative Agreement
Fiscal Year
2009
NTIS Accession No.
PB2010-113172
NTIS Price
A02
Identifying No.
FACE-08MI037; Cooperative-Agreement-Number-U60-CCU-521205
SIC Code
NAICS-23
Source Name
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
State
MI
Performing Organization
Michigan State University
TOP