Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Effectiveness of dust dispersion in the 20-L Siwek chamber.

Authors
Kalejaiye-O; Amyotte-PR; Pegg-MJ; Cashdollar-KL
Source
J Loss Prev Process Ind 2010 Jan; 23(1):46-59
NIOSHTIC No.
20036508
Abstract
The Siwek 20-L chamber is widely used throughout the world to evaluate the explosibility of dusts. This research evaluated the quality of dust dispersion in the Siwek 20-L chamber using Pittsburgh coal, Gilsonite, and purple K dusts. A Pittsburgh Research Laboratory (PRL) optical dust probe was used to measure optical transmittance through the dust cloud at various locations within the chamber. A total of 540 tests were performed, with triplicate tests at five nominal dust concentrations and six locations. The two standard dispersion nozzles (rebound and perforated annular nozzle) were compared. The transmissions corresponding to the normal ignition delay period were used to: (a) determine variations in spatial uniformity of dispersion obtained with both nozzles; (b) make comparisons between the experimental transmission data and those calculated from theory for the three dusts; and (c) make comparisons with transmission data measured in the PRL 20-L and Fike 1-m3 dust explosion chambers. The uniformity of dispersion for the three dusts was similar with both nozzles, despite the differences in nozzle geometry and mode of operation. Transmission data of the three dusts were all significantly lower than those calculated from theory. This was discovered to be, in part, due to significant reduction in particle size that occurred during dispersion. By measuring particle sizes before and after dispersion, values of 60%, 50%, and 20% reduction in particle size (based on the surface-weighted mean diameter) were obtained for Pittsburgh coal, Gilsonite, and purple K, respectively. Transmission data from the PRL 20-L, Fike 1-m3 and the Siwek 20-L chambers indicated comparable results in terms of uniformity of dispersion. However, transmission data from the Siwek 20-L chamber were significantly lower than those of the PRL and Fike chambers. Again, this was attributed, in part, to the significant reduction in particle size that occurred during dispersion in the Siwek chamber. The design of the outlet (dispersion) valve of the Siwek 20-L apparatus charge vessel was largely responsible for the particle break-up. The contribution to particle break-up by the dispersion nozzles and the high level of turbulence in the chamber were found to be minimal. This is a significant finding in that the dust particle size tested for explosibility in the Siwek chamber is considerably smaller than the original dust sample.
Keywords
Mining-industry; Coal-dust; Particulates; Particulate-dust; Dust-particles; Coal-mining; Analytical-processes; Analytical-instruments; Explosive-dusts; Explosion-prevention; Author Keywords: Dust explosion; Siwek 20-L chamber; Dust dispersion
Contact
Michael J. Pegg, Department of Process Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, 1360 Barrington St., Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 2X4
CODEN
JLPIE9
Publication Date
20100101
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
michael.pegg@dal.ca
Fiscal Year
2010
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
0950-4230
NIOSH Division
OMSHR
Source Name
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
State
PA
TOP