Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Indoor and outdoor air quality assessment of four wastewater treatment plants.

Authors
Lee-JA; Johnson-JC; Reynolds-SJ; Thorne-PS; O'Shaughnessy-PT
Source
J Occup Environ Hyg 2006 Jan; 3(1):36-43
NIOSHTIC No.
20035648
Abstract
The study assessed the air quality of four wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) by monitoring levels of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and endotoxin. Samples were taken over a 1-year period (2001-2002). The unit operations at each WWTP were categorized as: (a) grit removal, (b) primary clarification, (c) biological treatment, (d) secondary clarification, (e) sludge dewatering, and (f) digestion. Temperature and humidity were monitored simultaneously, whereas airborne H2S and endotoxin were monitored at each of the six unit operations in each plant. Carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD) and total incoming flow of the day of visit were also recorded. The geometric means of H2S concentration were less than 1 ppm and endotoxin ranged from 6-1247 EU/m3. A mixed model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for the statistical analysis. While temperature was not associated with the levels of both contaminants, humidity was influential on the level of H2S (p < 0.01) but not of endotoxin. CBOD did not affect the levels of either contaminant; however, incoming flows showed an association with the levels of H2S (p < 0.05). The concentrations of H2S in the six unit operations were statistically different, whereas endotoxin did not show any differences in concentrations between units. Individual comparisons proved that concentrations of H2S in the grit removal and sludge dewatering unit operations were statistically higher than the other operations. Overall, the concentrations of H2S varied depending on total incoming flow, humidity, and different unit operations. This trend was not observed for endotoxin. The results showed that the factors analyzed affected concentrations of H2S and endotoxin differently. Therefore, different control methods for endotoxin and H2S need to be considered to effectively reduce their concentrations at WWTPs.
Keywords
Chemical-analysis; Chemical-industry-workers; Chemical-manufacturing-industry; Chemical-properties; Chemical-synthesis; Waste-treatment; Water-analysis; Water-purification; Water-sampling; Treatment; Health-hazards; Health-standards; Safety-climate; Safety-education; Safety-equipment; Safety-measures; Safety-monitoring; Safety-personnel; Safety-practices; Control-methods; Environmental-exposure; Environmental-factors; Environmental-hazards; Environmental-health; Environmental-health-monitoring; Environmental-pollution; Environmental-protection; Exposure-assessment; Exposure-levels; Exposure-limits; Endotoxins; Author Keywords: endotoxin; hydrogen sulfide; wastewater treatment
Contact
J. A. Lee, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242
CODEN
JOEHA2
CAS No.
7783-06-4
Publication Date
20060101
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
patrick-oshaughnessy@uiowa.edu
Funding Type
Cooperative Agreement; Grant
Fiscal Year
2006
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Cooperative-Agreement-Number-U50-OH-007545; Grant-Number-T42-OH-008491
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
1545-9624
Source Name
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
State
CO; IA
Performing Organization
Colorado State University - Fort Collins
TOP