Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Handle grip span for optimising finger-specific force capability as a function of hand size.

Authors
Lee-S-J; Kong-Y-K; Lowe-BD; Song-S
Source
Ergonomics 2009 May; 52(5):601-608
NIOSHTIC No.
20035482
Abstract
Five grip spans (45 to 65 mm) were tested to evaluate the effects of handle grip span and user's hand size on maximum grip strength, individual finger force and subjective ratings of comfort using a computerised digital dynamometer with independent finger force sensors. Forty-six males participated and were assigned into three hand size groups (small, medium, large) according to their hands' length. In general, results showed the 55- and 50-mm grip spans were rated as the most comfortable sizes and showed the largest grip strength (433.6 N and 430.8 N, respectively), whereas the 65-mm grip span handle was rated as the least comfortable size and the least grip strength. With regard to the interaction effect of grip span and hand size, small and medium-hand participants rated the best preference for the 50- to 55- mm grip spans and the least for the 65-mm grip span, whereas large-hand participants rated the 55- to 60-mm grip spans as the most preferred and the 45-mm grip span as the least preferred. Normalised grip span (NGS) ratios (29% and 27%) are the ratios of user's hand length to handle grip span. The NGS ratios were obtained and applied for suggesting handle grip spans in order to maximise subjective comfort as well as gripping force according to the users' hand sizes. In the analysis of individual finger force, the middle finger force showed the highest contribution (37.5%) to the total finger force, followed by the ring (28.7%), index (20.2%) and little (13.6%) finger. In addition, each finger was observed to have a different optimal grip span for exerting the maximum force, resulting in a bow-contoured shaped handle ( the grip span of the handle at the centre is larger than the handle at the end) for two-handle hand tools. Thus, the grip spans for two-handle hand tools may be designed according to the users' hand/finger anthropometrics to maximise subjective ratings and performance based on this study. Results obtained in this study will provide guidelines for hand tool designers and manufacturers for designing grip spans of two-handle tools, which can maximise handle comfort and performance.
Keywords
Ergonomics; Hand-injuries; Hand-tools; Laboratory-testing; Musculoskeletal-system; Occupational-health; Posture; Statistical-analysis; Work-practices; Author Keywords: optimal grip span; two-handle tool designs; hand size; performance
Contact
Yong-Ku Kong, Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Syst Management Engn, Suwon, South Korea
CODEN
ERGOAX
Publication Date
20090501
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
ykong@skku.edu
Fiscal Year
2009
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
5
ISSN
0014-0139
NIOSH Division
DART
Priority Area
Construction
Source Name
Ergonomics
State
OH
TOP