Comparison of methods: dynamic versus hydrostatic testing of mine ventilation seals.
Sapko-MJ; Harteis-SP; Weiss-ES
Min Eng 2008 Sep; 60(9):147-153
From 2001 to 2007, the Pittsburgh Research Laboratory (PRL) of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conducted studies to develop alternative methodologies to full-scale explosion testing for determining the ultimate strength of mine seals. As a result, the PRL developed and proposes an alternative seal-strength evaluation method based on a hydrostatic pressure-loading concept. The researchers suggest pressure loading a seal using water to twice the expected dynamic design load. The hydrostatic chamber test offers a means of validating seal designs, establishing appropriate resistance functions and determining the ultimate strength of seals through testing to failure. This article contrasts the full-scale explosion and hydrostatic testing of mine seals using a simple dynamic system model and principles.
Miners; Mining-industry; Explosion-protection; Underground-mining; Accident-prevention; Mine-seals; Mine-shafts; Engineering-controls; Control-technology