Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Implications of claimant-favorable approaches used in dose and probability of causation calculations under EEOICPA.

Authors
Merwin-SE; Stewart-DN; Smith-MH; Potter-KD; Hinnefeld-SL
Source
Health Phys 2008 Jul; 95(1):148-159
NIOSHTIC No.
20034088
Abstract
There are many claimant-favorable factors inherent in both the reconstruction of radiation dose and the calculation of probability of causation under Part B of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. These factors result in an approximate 30% compensation rate for claims filed under EEOICPA, which is roughly an order of magnitude greater than the likely incidence of increased cancers as predicted by epidemiology studies and risk models. Additionally, there is essentially no chance that a claim that is denied compensation actually involves a radiation-induced cancer. The claimant-favorable nature of the Part B program is often misunderstood or ignored when the merits of the program are reported and debated. This paper provides details on how the technical aspects of the EEOICPA program that favor the claimants are being implemented.
Keywords
Dose-response; Occupational-exposure; Exposure-assessment; Radiation-exposure; Radiation-measurement; Nuclear-energy; Nuclear-radiation; Data-processing; Neutron-radiation; Radiation-facilities; Environmental-factors; X-ray-analysis; Medical-monitoring; Work-environment; Job-analysis; Statistical-analysis
Contact
Steven E. Merwin, Dade Moeller & Associates, 1835 Terminal Dr,Suite 200, Richland, WA 99352
CODEN
HLTPAO
Publication Date
20080701
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
semerwin@moellerinc.com
Fiscal Year
2008
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
0017-9078
NIOSH Division
OCAS
Source Name
Health Physics
State
OH; WA
TOP