Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler.

Authors
Page-SJ; Volkwein-JC; Vinson-RP; Joy-GJ; Mischler-SE; Tuchman-DP; McWilliams-LJ
Source
J Environ Monit 2008 Jan; 10(1):96-101
NIOSHTIC No.
20033402
Abstract
The United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, through an informal partnership with industry, labor, and the United States Mine Safety and Health Administration, has developed and tested a new instrument known as the Personal Dust Monitor (PDM). The new dust monitor is an integral part of the cap lamp that coal miners normally carry to work and provides continuous information about the concentration of respirable coal mine dust within the breathing zone of that individual. Previous laboratory testing demonstrated that there is a 95% confidence that greater than 95% of individual PDM measurements fall within +/- 25% of reference measurements. The work presented in this paper focuses on the relationship between the PDM and respirable dust concentrations currently measured by a coal mine dust personal sampler unit utilizing a 10 mm Dorr-Oliver nylon cyclone. The United Kingdom Mining Research Establishment instrument, used as the basis for coal mine respirable dust standards, had been designed specifically to match the United Kingdom British Medical Research Council (BMRC) criterion. The personal sampler is used with a 1.38 multiplier to convert readings to the BMRC criterion. A stratified random sampling design incorporating a proportionate allocation strategy was used to select a sample of mechanized mining units representative of all US underground coal mines. A sample of 180 mechanized mining units was chosen, representing approximately 20% of the mechanized mining units in production at the time the sample was selected. A total of 129 valid PDM/personal sampler dust sample sets were obtained. A weighted linear regression analysis of this data base shows that, in comparison with the personal sampler, the PDM requires a mass equivalency conversion multiplier of 1.05 [95% C.I. = (1.03, 1.08)] when the small intercept term is removed from the analysis. Removal of the intercept term results in a personal sampler-equivalent concentration increase of 2.9% at a PDM measurement of 2.0 mg m(-3).
Keywords
Mathematical-models; Dust-exposure; Dust-counting; Dust-control-equipment; Breathing-zone; Respirable-dust; Laboratory-testing; Work-environment; Work-practices; Workplace-monitoring; Workplace-studies; Particulate-dust; Particulate-sampling-methods; Particulates; Coal-dust; Coal-workers; Mine-workers; Mineral-dusts; Mining-equipment; Mining-industry; Miners
Contact
Steven J. Page, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NIOSH, Pittsburgh Research Laboratory, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236
CODEN
JEMOFW
Publication Date
20080101
Document Type
Journal Article
Fiscal Year
2008
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
1
ISSN
1464-0325
NIOSH Division
PRL
Source Name
Journal of Environmental Monitoring
State
PA
TOP