Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Potential work-related exposures to bloodborne pathogens by industry and occupation in the United States Part II: a telephone interview study.

Authors
Chen-GX; Jenkins-EL
Source
Am J Ind Med 2007 Apr; 50(4):285-292
NIOSHTIC No.
20032466
Abstract
Background: The companion surveillance portion of this study [Chen and Jenkins, 2007] reported the frequency and rate of potential work-related exposures to bloodborne pathogens (BBP) treated in emergency departments (EDs) by industry and occupation, but it lacks details on the circumstances of the exposure and other relevant issues such as BBP safety training, use of personal protective equipment (PPE) or safety needles, or reasons for seeking treatment in a hospital ED. Methods: Telephone interviews were conducted with workers who had been treated in EDs for potential work-related exposures to BBP in 2000-2002. Respondents were drawn from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. Results: Of the 593 interviews, 382 were from hospitals, 51 were from emergency medical service/firefighting (EMS/FF), 86 were from non-hospital healthcare settings (e.g., nursing homes, doctors' offices, home healthcare providers, etc.), 22 were from law enforcement (including police and correctional facilities), and 52 were from other non-healthcare settings (i.e., schools, hotels, and restaurants). Needlestick/sharps injuries were the primary source of exposure in hospitals and non-hospital healthcare settings. Skin and mucous membrane was the primary route of exposure in EMS/FF. Human bites accounted for a significant portion of the exposures in law enforcement and other non-healthcare settings. In general, workers from non-hospital settings were less likely to use PPE, to have BBP safety training, to be aware of the BBP standards and exposure treatment procedures, and to report or seek treatment for a work-related exposure compared to hospital workers. Conclusions: This study suggests that each industry group has unique needs that should be addressed.
Keywords
Bloodborne-pathogens; Exposure-assessment; Surveillance-programs; Occupational-exposure; Needlestick-injuries; Emergency-responders; Emergency-treatment; Employee-exposure; Health-care-facilities; Medical-equipment; Medical-personnel; Medical-treatment; Skin-exposure; Mucous-membranes; Law-enforcement-workers; Fire-fighters; Correctional-facilities; Author Keywords: bloodborne pathogens; occupational exposure; needlestick injuries; sharps injuries; emergency departments
Contact
Guang X. Chen, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of safety Research, Mail Stop 1811, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26505
CODEN
AJIMD8
Publication Date
20070401
Document Type
Journal Article
Fiscal Year
2007
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
4
ISSN
0271-3586
NIOSH Division
DSR; OD
Source Name
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
State
WV
TOP