Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Occupational blood-borne diseases in surgery.

Authors
Gomaa-A; Sinclair-R; Alarcon-W
Source
Am J Surg 2006 Sep; 192(3):408
NIOSHTIC No.
20030954
Abstract
We read with great interest Dr Fry's article "Occupational Blood-borne Diseases in Surgery" [1] recently published by the American Journal of Surgery. The article draws the conclusion that it is unlikely that we know all of the potential blood-borne pathogens that may pose an occupational risk for surgeons, that blood exposure in the operating room is tolerated with the same lassitude that characterized the pre-HIV era, and that prevention of blood exposure is a desirable goal. We are in agreement with Dr Fry's conclusions, and we would like to congratulate him on his efforts to prevent occupational infections. However, in complementing Dr Fry's recommendations, we would like to add that blood exposure prevention practices can be prioritized following the principles of the hierarchy of controls prevention model. In the hierarchy for sharps injury prevention, the first priority is to eliminate and reduce the use of needles and other sharps where possible. Next is to isolate the hazard, thereby protecting an otherwise exposed sharp, through the use of an engineering control. When these strategies are not available, or will not provide total protection, the focus shifts to work-practice controls and personal protective equipment [2]. Active involvement of the operating room team and hospital management is essential because decisions for supplies, immunizations, and training, among other considerations, require continuous team efforts. In relation to percutaneous injuries, the prevention approach that holds the greatest promise is to reduce the use of sharp instruments to the maximum possible extent by substitution [3] and other techniques like neutral zone or hand-free techniques. As such, the American College of Surgeons supports the universal adoption of blunt suture needles as the first choice for fascial suturing to minimize or eliminate needle-stick injuries from surgical needles [4]. Engineering controls on devices such as scalpels could potentially reduce scalpel blade injuries by as much as 64% [3] and personal protective equipment and techniques need to be used to avoid blood contacts [1]. We would also like to stress that reducing occupational exposures to blood in the operating room will require the involvement of all the operating room team (including attending and resident surgeons, nurses, circulators, students, and other personnel). Reducing exposure will take time, sustained effort, and a multitude of changes because of the complexity of the working environment [5]. Exposure and outcomes surveillance is needed to track progress of interventions and to identify gaps and future research needs, thus underscoring the importance of reporting blood and body fluid exposure promptly. Finally, surgical services departments should ensure all these issues are covered in training activities.
Keywords
Occupational-diseases; Surgery; Bloodborne-pathogens; Surgeons; Risk-factors; Risk-analysis; Occupational-exposure; Occupational-health; Occupational-hazards; Health-care-facilities; Health-care-personnel; Health-hazards; Medical-care; Medical-facilities; Medical-personnel; Safety-equipment; Safety-measures; Safety-practices; Personal-protective-equipment; Safety-education; Training; Models; Surveillance-programs
CODEN
AJSUAB
Publication Date
20060901
Document Type
Other
Fiscal Year
2006
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Issue of Publication
3
ISSN
0002-9610
NIOSH Division
DSHEFS; EID
Priority Area
Disease and Injury: Infectious Diseases
Source Name
The American Journal of Surgery
State
OH
TOP