Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

NIOSHTIC-2 Publications Search

Search Results

Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.

Authors
Chany-AM; Parakkat-J; Yang-G; Burr-DL; Marras-WS
Source
Spine J 2006 May-Jun; 6(3):296-305
NIOSHTIC No.
20030519
Abstract
Psychosocial stressors have been associated with low back pain reporting. However, response to psychosocial risk factors may be dependent on the individual's personality type that, in turn, can affect muscle recruitment and spine loading. This study explores how personality might be associated with spine loading during repetitive lifting performed throughout an entire work shift. Assess spine loading as a function of an individual's personality type during repetitive, long-term exposure to a materials handling tasks. Laboratory experiment where experienced and inexperienced participants performed repetitive, asymmetric lifts at various load and lift frequency levels throughout a series of 8-hour exposure periods. Spine loads were monitored throughout the work period. Twelve novice and 12 experienced materials handlers who were asymptomatic for back pain. Spine compression, anterior-posterior (A/P) shear, and lateral shear at the L5-S1 level. Participants were categorized into personality types based upon the Myers-Briggs personality type indicator. An electromyography-assisted biomechanical model was used to assess spine compression, A/P shear, and lateral shear throughout the exposure period. The results indicate that intuitors had higher shear spinal loading regardless of moment exposure, lift frequency, and time through the work period, compared with the sensor personality type. In addition, higher spine compressive and shear forces occurred in the perceiver personality compared with the judgers' personality trait, regardless of moment and, often, lift frequency. Novice lifters typically experienced greater spine loading. The results suggest that when there exists a personality-job environment mismatch, spinal loading increases via an increase in antagonistic co-contraction. The trends suggest that inherent personality characteristics may play a role in one's motor control strategies when performing a repetitive lifting task.
Keywords
Back-injuries; Musculoskeletal-system-disorders; Spinal-cord; Injuries; Models; Risk-factors; Shift-work; Shift-workers; Materials-handling; Repetitive-work; Exposure-levels; Exposure-assessment; Biomechanical-modeling; Occupational-health; Occupational-exposure
Contact
Biodynamics Laboratory, The Ohio State University, 1971 Neil Avenue, #210, Columbus, OH 43210-1210
CODEN
SJPOA6
Publication Date
20060501
Document Type
Journal Article
Email Address
marras.1@osu.edu
Funding Type
Grant
Fiscal Year
2006
NTIS Accession No.
NTIS Price
Identifying No.
Grant-Number-R01-OH-003913
Issue of Publication
3
ISSN
1529-9430
Source Name
The Spine Journal
State
OH
Performing Organization
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
TOP